Advertisement

Effects of Cobalt on Synthesis Gas Reactions over Copper-Based Catalysts

  • F. N. Lin
  • F. Pennella

Abstract

Typically, in the heterogeneously catalyzed hydrogenation of carbon monoxide, copper-based catalysts are very selective for the synthesis of methanol, while cobalt-based catalysts exhibit Fischer-Tropsch activity with high selectivity to hydrocarbons. Mixed copper-cobalt catalysts have been reported to show, in various degrees [1–4], selectivity for higher alcohol formation. Of particular interest are the copper-cobalt catalysts developed by Sugier and co-workers [3,4] at the Institut Francais du Petrole (IFP). Most of these catalysts contain aluminum, chromium or zinc, and small amounts of alkali, so that their composition corresponds to that of alkalized conventional copper-based methanol synthesis catalysts modified by the addition of cobalt. With these catalysts, high yields of higher alcohols were obtained under methanol synthesis conditions, and, in contrast with other copper-cobalt systems [1–2], there was no appreciable methanation, and little [3] or moderate [4] formation of higher hydrocarbons.

Keywords

High Alcohol Base Catalyst Methanol Synthesis Cobalt Content Cobalt Nitrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc. (London), 1429 (1934).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. K. Zaman Khan, C. H. Yang, and A. C. Oblad, Preprints, Div. Fuel Sci., ACS, 22(2):138 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Sugier and E. Freund, U.S. Patent 4,122,110 (1978) and German Offen. 2,748,097 (1978); assigned to Institu Francais du Petrole.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ph. Courty, D. Durand, E. Freund, and A. Sugier, Symposium on Catalytic Reaction of One Carbon Molecules, Bruges, June 1982Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. D. Casey and G. M. Chapman, U.S. Patent 3,790,505 (1974); assigned to Catalysts and Chemicals, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Guinier, “X-Ray Diffraction,” W. H. Freeman, New York, (1963) p 122.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. J. Elliott, private communication.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Mehta, G. W. Simmons, K. Klier, and R. G. Herman, J. Catal., 57:339 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Klier, V. Chatikavanij, R. G. Herman, and G. W. Simmons, J. Catal., 74:343 (1982); and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Klier and R. G. Herman, Final Technical Report to DOE, FE-3177-F (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Ketchik, T. P. Minyukova, L. I. Kuznetsova, L. M. Plyasova, T. M. Yurieva, and C. K. Boreskov, React. Kinet. Cat. Letter, 19:345 (1982); ibid. 19:355 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. N. Lin
    • 1
  • F. Pennella
    • 1
  1. 1.Phillips Petroleum CompanyBartlesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations