A Rejoinder to Stanley B. Messer and Meir Winokur

  • Paul L. Wachtel

Abstract

No doubt, from the perspective of many psychoanalytic therapists an integration with behavior therapy implies a “compromise” as Messer and Winokur suggest. And their description, in the last paragraph of their commentary, of the modal views and preferences of psychoanalytic and behavioral therapists is largely an accurate one. But the issue I have been addressing is not whether one can reconcile the beliefs, attitudes, or visions of the particular individuals who are presently psychoanalytic or behavioral therapists. Such a reconciliation is necessarily limited by the habits, group identifications, personalities, and vested interests of the people involved. As the physicist Max Planck put it,

a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

Keywords

Assimilation Clarification Impe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
  2. Freud, S . Inhibitions, symptoms, and anxiety. Standard edition(Vol. 21). London: Hogarth Press, 1959. (Originally published, 1926.)Google Scholar
  3. Wachtel, P. L. Transference, schema, and assimilation: The relevance of Piaget to the psychoanalytic theory of transference. The annual review of psychoanalysis(Vol. 8 ). New York: International Universities Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Wachtel, P. L. Vicious circles: The self and the rhetoric of emerging and unfolding. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 1982, 18, 259–273.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul L. Wachtel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCity College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations