Abstract
The gap between Rhoads’s perspective and mine seems to me so wide that I despair of making any genuine contact. I come to that conclusion in large measure because of the many indications of the gulf between us in our understanding of transference. I say this despite the fact that he does agree that a transference relationship develops in every therapy, whatever the approach, that even a referral has meaning in the transference, and that he cites problems in which behavioral methods cannot be more than partially successful at best.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gill, M. Analyzed and unanalyzed transference.International Journal of Psychiatry, 1973, 11, 328–335.
Gill M. The point of view of psychoanalysis: Energy discharge or person.Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 1983, 6, 523–551.
Schafer, R.A new language for psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.
Wachtel, P.Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gill, M.M. (1984). Differing Views of Transference. In: Arkowitz, H., Messer, S.B. (eds) Psychoanalytic Therapy and Behavior Therapy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2733-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2733-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9694-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2733-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive