Advertisement

Applications in Gynecology with Emphasis on the Cervix

  • Joseph H. Bellina
  • Gaetano Bandieramonte

Abstract

The bioeffects of the CO2 surgical laser have been described; it is now necessary to examine the advantages of this new surgical tool which have allowed the development of its practical applications in surgery, and how its biophysical properties may be used advantageously (Table 4.1). The surgeon can easily learn this new technique with training and practice. When one uses a knife, the depth of incision is controlled by the pressure applied to the scalpel. In contrast, using a laser instrument is a unique experience: the tissue is not touched and the desired effects are obtained by varying the biophysical parameters (Table 4.2) in freehand surgery as well as microscopic surgery. Precise power and beam spot size settings, appropriate speed of incision, and control of secondary burn effects from the heat energy of the beam by cooling methods are necessary for optimizing laser techniques. In spite of the disadvantage cited in Table 4.3, the precision of the laser instrument allows more conservative surgery and the characteristic of the hemostatic incision, with its self-sterilizing operative field, must be considered of essential importance in modern general surgery and especially useful for gynecologic applications (Table 4.4). The broad spectrum of continuous power output setting and exposure time allows the surgeon high flexibility of application. Laser surgery usually requires a combination of coagulation, excision, and vaporization techniques.

Keywords

Obstet Gynecol Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Laser Surgery Cervix Uterus Transformation Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Minton JP, Zelen M: A method for predicting malignant tumor destruction by laser radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst 34: 291 – 296, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dorsey JH: Excisional and reconstructive surgery with the C02 laser, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery. Proceedings of an International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 197 – 208.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oosterhuis JW: Lymphatic migration after laser surgery. Lancet 1: 446 – 447, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldman L: Laser surgery for skin cancer. NY State J Med 77: 1897 – 1900, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fidler JP, Law E, MacMillan GB, et al: Comparison of C02 laser excision of burns with other thermal knives. Ann NY Acad Sci 267: 54 – 261, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stellar S, Mejer R, Waliass H, et al: Carbon dioxide laser debridement of decubitus ulcers. Ann Surg 179: 230 – 237, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Madden JE, Edlich RF, Custer JR, et al: Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. IV. Resistance to infection of surgical wounds made by knife, electro– surgery and laser. Am J Surg 119: 222 – 224, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fruhmorgen F, Bodem F, Reidenbach HD, et al: Long–term observation in endoscopic laser coagulation in gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 7: 189 – 196, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nath G, Gorish W, Kiefhaber P: First laser endoscopy via fiberoptic transmission system. Endoscopy 5: 208 – 213, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nath G, Gorish W, Kiefhaber P, Kreitmair A: Transmission of a powerful argon laser beam through a fiberoptic flexible gastroscope for operative gastroscopy. Endoscopy 5: 213 – 215, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pinnow DA: Polycrystalline fiber optical waveguides for infrared transmission. Appl Phys Lett 33: 28 – 29, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakurai Y, Nimsakul N, Tanino R, et al: Japanese fiber–optic induced C02 laser in clinical application, preliminary report, in Atsumi K, Nimsakul N (eds): Proceedings, IV Congress of the International Society for Laser Surgery, Tokyo, Nov 1981. Inter Group Corp, 1982, pp 1/30–1/33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seidman H, Silverberg E, Holleb Al: Cancer statistics 1976: a comparison of white and black populations. CA 26: 2 – 30, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koss L: Epidemiology of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Excerpta Med Int Congr Series No. 351, 3: 307 – 313, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stern E: Epidemiology of dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 24: 711 – 723, 1969.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christopherson WM: Concepts of genesis and development in early cervical neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 24: 842 – 850, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Navratil E, Burghardt E, Bajardi F, Nash W: Simultaneous colposcopy and cytology used in screening for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 75: 1292 – 1297, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fidler HK, Boyes DA, Worth AJ: Cervical cancer detection in British Columbia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 75: 392 – 404, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feldman JJ, Kent DR, Pennington RL: Intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix in the teenagers. Cancer 41: 1405 – 1408, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lindberg LG, Ahlgren M, Nordquist SRB: Cytologic screening and rescreening in detection and prevention of preclinical cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 5: 121 – 133, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bendich A, Borenfreund E, Witkin SS, et al: Information transfer and sperm uptake by mammalian somatic cells. Progr Nucl Acid Res Mol Biol 17: 43 – 73, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Witkin S, Korngold GC, Bendich A: Ribonuclease–sensitive DNA–synthesizing complex in human sperm heads and seminal fluid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 3295 – 3299, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martin EM: Marital and coital factors in cervical cancer. Am J Public Health 57: 841– 847, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meisels A, Fortin R, Roy M: Condylomatous lesions of the cervix. II. Cytologic, colposcopy and histopathologic study. Acta Cytol 21: 379 – 390, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wentz WB, Reagan JW, Heggie AD: Cervical carcinogenesis with herpes simplex virus, Type 2. Obstet Gynecol 46: 117 – 121, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    zur Hausen H: Condylomata acuminata and human genital cancer. Cancer Res 36: 794, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pilotti S, Rilke F, Depalo G, et al: Condyloma of the uterine cervix and koilocytosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Clin Pathol 34: 532 – 541, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feldman M, Linzey ME, Srebnik E, et al: Abnormal cervical cytology in the teenager. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126: 418 – 421, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rotkin D: A comparison of key epidemiological studies in cervical cancer related to current searches for transmissible agents. Cancer Res 33: 1353 – 1357, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rotkin D: Adolescent coitus and cervical cancer. Association of related events with increased risk. Cancer Res 27: 603 – 617, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hamperl H, Kaufmann C: The cervix uteri at different ages. Obstet Gynecol 14: 621– 631, 1959.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Langley FA, Crompton AC: Epithelial Abnormalities of the Cervix Uteri. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Howard L, Jr, Erickson CC, Stoddard LD: A study of the incidence and histogenesis of endocervical metaplasia and intraepithelial carcinoma. Cancer 4: 1210 – 1223, 1951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holzer E, Burghardt E: Die lokalisation des pathologischen cervixepithels. II. Aufsteigende Vberhauntung, plattenepithelmetaplasia und basale hyperplasia. Arch Gynecol 210: 395 – 415, 1971.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Coppleson M: The origin and nature of premalignant lesions of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 8: 539 – 550, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reid BL, Garrett WJ: Two types of squamous epithelium of the human ectocervix. A histological and colposcopic study. Austr NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 3: 1 – 8, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Coppleson M, Reid BL: Preclinical Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fluhmann CF: The Cervix Uteri and its Diseases. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1961.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferenczy A, Richart RM: Scanning electron microscopy of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 151 – 157, 1973.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jordan JA, Williams AE: Scanning electron microscopy in the study of cervical neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 78: 940 – 946, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Williams AE, Jordan JA, Allen JM, Murphy JF: The surface ultrastructure of normal and metaplastic cervical epithelia and of carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res 33: 504 – 513, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christopherson WM, Parker JE: Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix, in Gray LA (ed): Dysplasia, Carcinoma in situand Microinvasive Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1964.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jordan MJ, Bader GM, Day E: Carcinoma in situof the cervix and related lesions. An 11 year prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 89:160–182, 1964.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Richart RM: Natural history of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 10: 748 – 784, 1967.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Varga A: The relationship of cervical dysplasia to in situand invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 95: 759 – 762, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barron BA, Richart RM: A statistical model of the natural history of cervical carcinoma based on a prospective study of 557 cases. J Natl Cancer Inst 41: 1343 – 1353, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burghardt E: Besondere Epithelbilder als Ausgangspunkt beginnend invasiven Kreb– swachstums an der Portio. Geburtshiffe Frauenheilkd 27:1170–1180, 1967.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barren BA, Richart RM: Statistical model of the natural history of cervical carcinoma. II. Estimates of the transition time from dysplasia to carcinoma in situJ Natl Cancer Inst 45: 1025 – 1030, 1970.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Richart RM, Barron BA: A follow–up study of patients with cervical dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 105: 386 – 393, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stern E, Neely PM: Dysplasia of the uterine cervix—incidence of regression, recurrence and cancer. Cancer 17: 508 – 512, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Richart RM: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the cervicologist. Can J Med Tech 38: 177 – 180, 1980.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Przybora LA, Plutowa A: Histological topography of carcinoma in situof the cervix uteri. Cancer 12: 268 – 277, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    De Virgiliis G, Remotti G, Balzarini MP, et al: Relazione tra eta e localizzazione del carcinoma in situ del collo dellutero. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat 100:384–398Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thompson BH, Woodruff DJ, Davis JH, et al: Cytopathology, histopathology, and colposcopy in the management of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 329 – 338, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Coppleson M, Pixley E, Reid E: Colposcopy: A Scientific and Practical Approach to the Cervix in Health and Disease. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1971.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Remotti G, DeVirgiliis G: La cervice uterina nelle varie eta della donna, in: La pato– logia della cervice uterina. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat 3:36–45,1980.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Coppleson M, Reid BL: A colposcopic study of the cervix during pregnancy and the puerperium. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 73: 575 – 585, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Takeuchi A, McKay DG: Area of the cervix involved by carcinoma in situand anaplasia (atypical hyperplasia). Obstet Gynecol 15: 134 – 145, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Richart MR: Colpomicroscopic studies of the distribution of dysplasia and carcinoma in situon the exposed portion of the human uterine cervix. Cancer 18: 950 – 954, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wielenga G, Old JW, Von Haam E: Squamous carcinoma in situof the uterine cervix. II. Topography and clinical correlations. Cancer 18: 1612 – 1621, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Anderson MC, Hargley RB: Cervical crypt involvement by intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 55: 546 – 550, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thomton WN, Fox CH: Relationship of squamocolumnar function and endocervical gland to the site or origin of CIS of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:838–839Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Burke L, Covell L, Antonioli D: Carbon dioxide laser therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: factor determining success rate. Lasers Surg Med 1: 113 – 122, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bellina JH, Dunlap WP, Riopelle MA: Reliability of histopathologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. South Med J 75: 608, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Casteno-Almendral A, Muller H, Naujoks H, Casteno-Almendral JL: Topographical and histological localization of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, microinvasion and microcarcinomata. Gynecol Oncol 1: 320 – 329, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Townsend DE, Richard RM, Marks E, Nielsen J: Invasive cancer following outpatient evaluation and therapy for cervical disease. Obstet Gynecol 57: 145 – 149, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Baggish MS: C02 laser for CIN, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, Jan 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980. pp 173–196Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sevin BU, Ford JH, Gurtanner RD, et al: Invasive cancer of the cervix after cryosurgery. Pitfalls of conservative management. Obstet Gynecol 53:465–471, 1979Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Griffiths CT, Austin JH, Younge PA: Punch biopsy of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 55:695–703, 1964Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Townsend DE, Ostergard DR, Mishell DR, Hirose FM: Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 705:429–434, 1970Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ostegard DR: Cryosurgery treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 56: 231 – 233, 1980.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bellina JH, Gyer DR, Voros JI, Raviotta JJ: Capillary hemangioma managed by the C02 laser. Obstet Gynecol 55: 129, 1980.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cashman BZ: The role of deep cauterization in the prevention of cancer of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 41: 216 – 224, 1941.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Peyton FW, Peyton RR, Anderson VL, et al: The importance of cauterization to maintain a healthy cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131: 374 – 380, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Payne FL: The treatment of leukorrhea. Am J Obstet Gynecol 17: 841 – 848, 1929.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Krantz KE: Discussion of Staff’s laser treatment of cervical and vaginal neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128: 134 – 136, 1977.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sharp F, MacLean AB, More A, Murray EL: Quantitated laser–tissue destruction and the development of a technique for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, Jan 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 231 – 244.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bellina JH, Seto YJ: Pathological and physical investigations into C02 laser tissue interactions with specific emphasis on cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Lasers Surg Med 1: 47 – 69, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lisfrac J: Memoire sur une nouvelle methode de practique l’ operation de la taille chez des femmes. Gaz Med France 2: 835, 1815.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Dorsey JH, Diggs ES: Microsurgical conization of the cervix by carbon dioxide laser. Obstet Gynecol 54: 565 – 570, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Carter R, Krantz KE, Hara G, et al: Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with the carbon dioxide laser beam. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131: 831 – 836, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mihashi S, Jako CJ, Incze J, et al: Laser surgery in otolaryngology: interaction of C02 laser and soft tissue. Ann NY Acad Sci 267: 263 – 294, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Verschueren R: The C02 Laser in Tumor Surgery. Assen, Amsterdam, Van Gorcum 1976, pp 38 – 47.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Dorsey JH: Excisional biopsy and conization of the cervix, in CR Wheeless (ed): An Atlas of Pelvic Surgery. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1981, pp 157 – 159.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Baggish MS, Dorsey JH: C02 laser for the treatment of vulvar carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol 57: 371 – 375, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Dorsey JH, Diggs ES, Baggish MS: Cytourethroscopy with the direct view contac endoscope. Obstet Gynecol 57: 115 – 118, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bellina JH, Voros JI, Kurpel J: Carbon dioxide laser microsurgery in gynecology, in Kaplan I (ed): Proceedings, II International Symposium on Laser Surgery, Dallas, TX, Oct 1977. Jerusalem, Jerusalem Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Holmquist N, Bellina J, Danos M: Vaginal and cervical cytological changes following laser treatment. Acta Cytol 20: 290 – 294, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Baggish MS: High power density carbon dioxide laser therapy for early cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 117 – 125, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jordan JA, Mylotte MS: The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by C02 laser vaporization, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, Jan 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 245 – 252.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bellina JH, Wright VC, Voros JI, et al: C02 laser management of intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 828 – 832, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Baggish MS: Carbon dioxide laser treatment for condyloma acuminata venereal infections. Obstet Gynecol 55: 711 – 715, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Stafl A, Wilkinson EJ, Mattingly RT: Laser treatment of cervical and vaginal neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128: 128 – 136, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Masterson BJ, Krantz KE, Calkins JW, et al: The carbon dioxide laser in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 565 – 567, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Popkin DR: The C02 laser in the treatment of CIN, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, January 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 119 – 130.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Benedet JL, Nickerson KG, White GW: Laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 58: 188 – 191, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Dorsey J: Cervical healing after laser conization, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, New York, Plenum Press, 1981, pp 131 – 143.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Grundsell H, Alm P, Larsson G: Laser conization versus cold knife conization. A prospective, randomized study, in Atsumi K, Nimsakul N (eds): Proceedings IV International Congress, Society for Laser Surgery, Tokyo, Japan, November 1981, Inter Group Corp, 1982, pp 13/15–13/16.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sadoul G, Beuret T: About 40 conizations with the C02 laser, in Atsumi K, Nimsakul N (eds): Proceedings IV International Congress, Society for Laser Surgery, Tokyo, Japan, November 23–27, 1981, Inter Group Corp, 1982, pp 13/17–13/20.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Baggish MS: Complications associated with carbon dioxide laser surgery in gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 568 – 574, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Coupez F, Legros R: Traitment des lesions du col uterin par le laser. Un experience de 18 mois. Gynecologie 32: 57 – 61, 1981.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mazur P: Cryobiology: the freezing biological systems. Science 168: 939 – 949, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Creasman WT, Need JC, Curry SL, et al: Efficacy of cryosurgical treatment of severe cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 41: 501 – 506, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tredway DR, Townsend DE, Howland DN, Upton RT: Colposcopy and cryosurgery in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 1020 – 1024, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Townsend DE, Ostergard DR: Cryocauterization for preinvasive cervical neoplasia. J Reprod Med 6: 171 – 176, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kaufman RM, Irwin JF: The cryosurgical therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. III. Continuing followup. J Obstet Gynecol 131: 381 – 388, 1978.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Popkin DR, Scali V, Ahmed MN: Cryosurgery for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 551 – 554, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wright VC: Observations regarding patients diagnosed with CIN. The use of cryosurgery and C02 laser, in Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, January 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 217 – 230.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ostergard DR: Cryosurgery treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 56: 231 – 233, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mac Vicar J, Willocks J: The effect of diathermy conization of the cervix on subsequent fertility, pregnancy and delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 75: 355 – 356, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Chanen W, Hollyock VE: Colposcopy and the conservative management of cervical dysplasias and carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol 43: 527 – 534, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hollyock VE, Chanen W: Electrocoagulation diathermy for the treatment of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol 47: 196 – 199, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Beard RW: Diathermy coning and cautery in the treatment of the eroded cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 71: 287 – 292, 1964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Peyton FW, Rosen NA: Cervical cauterization and carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 86: 111 – 119, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Kolstad P: Diagnosis and management of precancerous lesions of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 8: 551 – 560, 1970.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Creasman WT, Rutledge F: Carcinoma insituof the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 40: 373 – 380, 1972.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kolstad P, Klein V: Long term followup of 1121 cases of carcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol 48: 125 – 129, 1976.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ostergard DR, Morton DG: Multifocal carcinoma of the female genitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 99: 1006 – 1015, 1965.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ostergard DR, Gondos B: Outpatient therapy of preinvasive cervical neoplasia; selection of patients with the use of colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 783 – 788, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Hollyock VE, Chanen W: The use of the colposcope in the selection of patients for cervical cone biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 185 – 189, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Krumholz BA, Knapp RC: Colposcopic selection of biopsy sites. Obstet Gynecol 39: 22 – 26, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Holzer E: Conservative treatment of carcinoma in situ: a clinical report concerning 866 cases after conization. Obstet Gynecol Surv 34: 870 – 871, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Phillips JC: Public health aspects of critical care medicine and anesthesiology, Anesth Mortal Clin Anesth 10: 220, 1974.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Special Committee Investigating Deaths Under Anesthesia: Report on 745 classified cases, 1960–1968. Med J Aust 1: 573, 1970.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Silbar EL, Woodruff JD: Evaluation of biopsy, cone and hysterectomy sequence in intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 27: 89 – 97, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Garcia RL, Bigelow B, Demoupoulos RI, Beckman EM: Evaluation of cone biopsy in management of carcinoma in situof the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 3: 32 – 39, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Hester LL, Reed RA: An evaluation of cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 80:715– 721, 1960.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Jones JM, Sweetman P, Hibbard BM: The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix. A case–control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86: 913 – 916, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Leimen G, Harrison NA, Rubin A: Pregnancy following conization of the cervix. Complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 14 – 18, 1980.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Onroos J, Keukko P, Kilkku P, Punnonen R: Pregnancy and delivery after conization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 5: 477 – 480, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Davis RM, Cooke JK, Kirk RF: Cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 40: 23 – 27, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Villasanta U, Durkin JP: Indications and complications of cold knife conization of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 27: 717 – 723, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Attili A, DePalo G: La conizzazione non e un trattamento che assicuri la conservazione della fertilita, in Catanna VC (ed): Proceedings, II Congress of the Society for Italian Surgical Oncology, Florence, Nov 9–10,1978. Milan, National Cancer Institute, 1978, pp 323 – 326.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Kullander S, Sjoberg NO: Treatment of carcinoma in situof the cervix by conization. A five year followup. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 50: 153 – 157, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Lee NH: The effect of cone biopsy on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Gynecol Oncol 6: 1 – 6, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Boyes DA, Worth AJ, Fidler HK: The results of treatment of 4389 cases of preclinical cervical squamous carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 77: 769 – 780, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Bjerre B, Eliasson G, Linell F, et al: Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situof the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 143 – 152, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Toaff R: Use of carbon dioxide laser in gynecological surgery, in Kaplan I, Ascher PW (eds): Proceedings III International Congress Laser Surgery, Graz Sept 1979. Tel Aviv, OT, PAZ, 1979, pp 235 – 238.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Shafir R, Zweig A, Slutzki S, Bornstein L: A use of the carbon dioxide laser in an abdominoperineal resection for epidermoid anal carcinoma: a case report. Br J Surg 65: 565 – 566, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Heinzl S: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia degree III: laser therapy yes or no? in: Bellina JH (ed): Gynecologic Laser Surgery, Proceedings of the International Congress on Gynecologic Laser Surgery and Related Works, New Orleans, LA, Jan 1980. New York, Plenum Press, 1980, pp 145 – 150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph H. Bellina
    • 1
  • Gaetano Bandieramonte
    • 2
  1. 1.Laser Research FoundationNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.National Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations