Promoting Change in Mental Retardation Facilities
Residential institutions have served for years as the major providers of care and habilitation for retarded individuals. In recent years, these facilities have come under critical scrutiny. Many critics have focused on the discrepancy between what should be occurring for clients and the services they actually receive. Concern and alarm have been voiced about the health care, humaneness of the living conditions, habilitation, and protection of the civil rights of residents of these facilities.
KeywordsStaff Member Staff Training Apply Behavior Analysis Corrective Feedback Staff Management
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cataldo, M. F., & Risley, T. R. Evaluation of living environments: The MANIFEST description of ward activities. In P. O. Davison, F. W. Clark, & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Evaluation of behavioral programs in community, residential and school settings. Champaign, Ill.: Research Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. Environmental programming: Implications for the severely handicapped. In H. J. Prehm & J. Deitz (Eds.), Early intervention for the severely handicapped: Programming and accountability. University of Oregon: Severely Handicapped Learner Program Monograph No. 2, 1976.Google Scholar
- Standards for Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Public Health Subpart G, Special Edition of the Federal Register. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar