Advertisement

Counterterms in Extended Supergravities

  • R. E. Kallosh

Abstract

The purpose of this talk is, firstly, to describe the situation with ultraviolet divergences in supergravity and, secondly, to present the quantization of gauge theories with open algebras in the representation with the third ghost. This latter work was performed by I. Batalin and R. Kallosh.1

Keywords

Gauge Theory Open Algebra Feynman Rule Conformal Anomaly Gauge Algebra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I.A. Batalin and R.E. Kallosh, “Quantization of gauge theories with open algebra in the representation with the third ghost” submitted to Nucl. Phys. B.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.E. Kallosh, Pisma ZhETF33292 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Howe and U. Lindström, inSuperspace and Supergravityed. by S.W. Hawking and M. Rocek (Cambridge University Press, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.E. Kallosh, Phys. Lett.99B122 (1981).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Howe, K.S. Stelle and P.K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys.B191, 445 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Howe and U. Lindström, Nucl. Phys.B181, 487 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.T. Grisaru, Lecture at the Supergravity School, Trieste (1981), to be published.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Siegel (1980), unpublished.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.T. Grisaru and W. Siegel, “The one-loop, four-particle S-matrix in extended supergravity”, preprint CALT-68–882 (1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Duff, this issue.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.A. Vladimirov and O.V. Tarasov, Phys. Lett.93B429 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. M. Grisaru, M. Rocek and W. Siegel, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1063 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. W.E. Gaswell and D. Zanon, Phys.100B152 (1981).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    R.E. Kallosh, Pisma ZhETF29, 192, 493 (1979).Google Scholar
  15. M. Duff and S.M. Christensen, Nucl. Phys.B154, 301 (1979).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Duff, S.M. Christensen, S. Deser and M. Grisaru, Phys. Lett.86B157 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. R.E. Kallosh, Nucl. Phys.B165, 119 (1980).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 13.
    A.H. Chamseddine, Nucl. Phys.B185, 97 (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 13.
    A.H. Chamseddine, Nucl. Phys.B185, 403 (1981)Google Scholar
  20. B.E.W. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys.B188, 176 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, B. de Wit and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Nucl. Phys.B1951982) 97.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 14.
    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk and D. Olive, Phys. Lett.65B.282 (1976); Nucl. Phys.B122253 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Brink, J. Scherk and J.H. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys.B12177 (1977).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 15.
    B.S. De Witt, Phys. Rev.1621195 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 16.
    N.K. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys.B 140, 499 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    R.E. Kallosh, Nucl. Phys.B 141, 141 (1978).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 18.
    I.A. Batalin and G.A. Vilcovisky, Phys. Lett.102B, 27 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 19.
    B. de Wit and J.W. van Holten, Phys. Lett.79B389 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 20.
    N.K. Nielsen, Phys. Lett.103B, 197 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Kallosh
    • 1
  1. 1.Lebedev Physical InstituteMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations