Spatial Organization of a Cognitive System and Intrinsic Prosocial Motivation

Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (BLSC, volume 31)


For students of prosocial behavior, the crucial issue, as Lauren Wispé put it some time ago, is: Why would anyone do it?


Prosocial Behavior Cognitive System Spatial Organization Semantic Distance Social Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R. D. The search for a general theory of behavior. Behavioral Science, 1975, 20, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Tal, D. Prosocial behavior: Theory and research. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Tal, D., Bar-Zohar, Y., Greenberg, M. S., and Hermon, M. Reciprocity behavior in the relationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim. Sociometry, 1977, 40, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., and Birch, K. Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  5. Bratfish, O. Further study of the relation between subjective distance and emotional involvement. Reports from Psychological Laboratories (University of Stockholm), 1966, No. 208.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, D. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Codol, J. P. Poröwnanie ja-inni a normy spoleczne: Zjawisko P.I.P. Studia Psychologiczne, 1977, 26(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
  8. Dobrowolny, M. B., Misiti, R., & Secchiaroli, G. Spatial cognitive representation of the working environment and working experience in the factory. Italian Journal of Psychology, 1980, 7 (1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Ekman, G., and Bratfish, O. Subjective geographic distance and emotional involvement. Reports from Psychological Laboratories (University of Stockholm), 1965, No. 189.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, S. Measurement of drive and conflict in humans. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 10). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  11. Grinker, R. R., & Spiegel, J. Men under stress. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hebb, D. O. The Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.Google Scholar
  13. Hornstein, H. Promotive tension and prosocial behavior: A Levinian analysis. In L. Wispe Ed.), Altruism, sympathy and helping. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, J. M. Motivation inherent in information processing and action. In O. J. Harvey Ed.), Motivation and social interaction: Cognitive determinants. New York: Ronald Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  15. Iwanov-Smolenski, A. G. O badaniu wspöldzialania I i II ukladu syngnalöw. In A. G. Iwanow-Smolenski (Ed.), Zagadnienia wyzszych czynnosci nerwowych. Warsaw: PZWL, 1954.Google Scholar
  16. Jarymowicz, M. Atrakcyjnosc i awersyjnosc podobienstwa “ja”-“inni.” Przeglad Psychologiczny, 1982, 1, 61-73.Google Scholar
  17. Jarymowicz, M., & Codol, J. P. Perception of similarity between seif and other: A search for uniqueness of the self Studia Psychologiczne, 1979, 18 (2), 41 - 57.Google Scholar
  18. Karylowski, J. Z badan nad mechanizmani pozytywnych ustosunkowan interpersonalnych. Wroclaw: Ossolineaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Karylowski, J. Self-esteem, similarity, liking and helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 71-74.Google Scholar
  20. Korzeniowski, K. Samoakceptacja i izolacja struktury “ja” a sympatia w stosunka do innych i decentracja interpersonalna. Studia Psychologiczne, 1980, 19 (1), 33 – 47.Google Scholar
  21. Krasnogorski, I. N. Studies of higher nervous activities (Vol. 1 ). Moskwa: Medgiz, 1954.Google Scholar
  22. Krebs, D. Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 1134–1146.Google Scholar
  23. Kurcz, I. Generalizacja semantyczna ruchöw dowolnych. Studia Psychologiczne, 1963, 5, 35–74.Google Scholar
  24. Leonard, R. L. Self-concept and attraction for similar and dissimilar other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 31, 926-929.Google Scholar
  25. Lewicka, M. Wplyw nastawienia poznawczego na ksztaltowanie i modyfikacje sadöw odrugiej osobie. Studia Psychologiczne, 1979, 18 (1), 21 – 36.Google Scholar
  26. Lewicki, P. Przedmiotowy i podmiotowy mechanizm percepcji spolecznej. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warsaw, 1977.Google Scholar
  27. Lundberg, U., & Ellonen, E. Involvement in potential future events estimated by males and females. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 1977, 18.Google Scholar
  28. Markus, H. Self-schemata and processing information about the seif. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 63-78.Google Scholar
  29. Markus, H. The seif in thought and memory. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.),The seif in social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 1981, 32, 89-115.Google Scholar
  31. Milgram, S. The individual in a social world. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.Google Scholar
  32. Nowak, A., & Wisniewski, A. Psychological distance between concepts and generalization of judgments. Unpublished report, n. d.Google Scholar
  33. Piaget, J. The moral judgment of a child. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J. Six psychological studies. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  35. Piliavin, J. A., & Piliavin, J. M. The good Samaritan: Why does he help? Unpublished manuscript, n. d.Google Scholar
  36. Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Clark, R. D. Emergency intervention. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  37. Razran, G. Sentential and propositional generalization of salivary conditioning to verbal Stimuli. Science, 1949, 109, 447.Google Scholar
  38. Reykowski, J. Teoria osobowosci: Tezy. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warsaw, 1974.Google Scholar
  39. Reykowski, J. Motywacja, postawy prospoleczne a osobowosc. Warsaw: PWN, 1979.Google Scholar
  40. Reykowski, J. Motivation of prosocial behavior. In V. D. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Living with other people. New York: Academic Press, 1982. (a)Google Scholar
  41. Reykowski, J. Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 1982, 33, 123-155. (b)Google Scholar
  42. Reykowski,]., & Kochanska, G. Szkice z teorii osobowosci. Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna,1980.Google Scholar
  43. Schneider, D. J. Social psychology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1976.Google Scholar
  44. Sherif, M., and Hovland, C. I. Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Häven: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  45. Slater, P. (Ed.). Exploration of interpersonal space. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  46. Smolenska, M. Z. Dystans psychologiczny partnera a dzialanie na jego rzecz. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warsaw, 1979.Google Scholar
  47. Staub, E. Positive social behavior and morality. Vol. 1. Social and personal influences. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  48. Staub, E., and Baer, R. J. Stimulus characteristics of sufferer and difficulty of escape as determinants of helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sternberg, R.J., Tourangeau, R., and Nigro, G. Metaphor, induction and social policy: The convergence of macroscopic and microscopic views. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University,Google Scholar
  50. Stotland, E. Exploratory investigation of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4 ). New York: Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  51. Trzebinski, J. Natural concepts and creativity. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 11, 45–51.Google Scholar
  52. von Wright, J., & Kinnunen, R. Scaling of involvement in personal and global future events. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1977, 18.Google Scholar
  53. Witkin, A. A. Origins of cognitive style. In C. Sheerer (Ed.), Cognition: Theory, research, promise. New York: Harper, 1964.Google Scholar
  54. Zajonc, R. B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPolish Academy of ScienceWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations