Advertisement

Abstract

Man has been able to make tools for at least 5 million years, to make fire for at least a half-million years, and practice farming and agriculture for at least 10,000 years. In a sense, it is a long time ago that man developed control over ecological factors. Even pollution is not a new problem, since agriculture itself cannot avoid altering the naturally balanced ecosystems. Pollution is certainly not limited to advanced civilization (Brothwell, 1972). Since the neolithicum, forests have been permanently destroyed by fire and the ground has been degraded (North Africa, the Middle East). Irrigation of fields has been known for 5000 years in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and resulted in an increase of schistosomiasis. Growth of populations resulted in new urban environments and air pollution. Since chimneys were absent in primitive houses, evidence of anthracosis has been found in some Egyptian mummies. Lead poisoning was already known during the Roman period.

Keywords

Sister Chromatid Exchange Lead Poisoning Germinal Cell Roman Period Advanced Civilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, B. N., Durston, W. E., Yamasaki, E., and Lee, F. D., 1973, Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US. 70: 2281–2285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boveri, T, 1914, Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren, Gustav Fisher, Jena, pp. 64.Google Scholar
  3. Brothwell, D., 1972, The question of pollution in earlier and less developed societies, in Population and Pollution (edited by P. R. Cox and J. Peel ). Academic Press, New York, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
  4. Cairns, J., 1975, Mutation, selection and natural history of cancer, Nature 225: 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleaver, J. E., 1977, DNA repair processes and their impairment in some human diseases, in Progress in Genetic Toxicology, (edited by D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels ), Elsevier, New York, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
  6. Kalter, H., 1975, Some relations between teratogenesis and mutagenesis, Mutation Res. 33: 29–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindhal, T., 1976, A new class of enzymes acting on damaged DNA, Nature 259: 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Magee, M., 1977, The relationship between mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and teratogenesis, in Progress in Genetic Toxicology (edited by D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels ), Elsevier, New York, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
  9. Perry, P., and Evans, H. J., 1974, New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids, Nature 251: 156–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Poswillo, G., 1976, Mechanisms and pathogenesis of malformations, Brit. Med. Bull. 32: 59–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Unscear, 1972, United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation ionizing radiation: Levels and effects, Report to the General Assembly with Annexes, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Weinstein, I. B., Yamaguchi, N., Gebert, R., and Kaighn, M. E., 1975, Use of epithelial cultures for studies on the mechanism of transformation by chemical carcinogens, In vitro 2: 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Susanne
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Human GeneticsFree University BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations