The Role of Two-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Non-Invasive Evaluation of Prosthetic Heart Valve Function

  • Gary S. Mintz
  • Morris N. Kotler
  • Bernard L. Segal

Abstract

Evaluation of the patient with a prosthetic heart valve begins with a careful history and physical examination [1]. Depending on the type of prosthesis and its location, non-invasive testing (echophonocardiography, cinefluoroscopy, or two-dimensional echocardiography) can be invaluable in detecting prosthesis malfunction or in differentiating prosthesis malfunction from left ventricular dysfunction. However, in some patients a definitive diagnosis is possible only after invasive study.

Keywords

Cage Cardiol Perforation Stein Tral 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mintz GS, Carlton EB & Kotler MN: Comparison of noninvasive techniques in evaluation of the non-dissue cardiac valve prosthesis. Am J Carciol 49: 39–44, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brodie BR, Grossman W, McLaurin L, Starek PJK & Craige E: Diagnosis of prosthetic mitral valve malfunction with combined echophonocardiography. Circulation 53: 93–100, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cunha CLP, Giuliani ER, Callahan JA & Pluth JR: Echophonocardiographic findings in patients with prosthetic valve malfunction. Mayo Clin Proc 55: 231–242, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DePace NL, Kotler MN Mintz GS, Lichtenberg R, Goel IP & Segal BL: Echocardiographic and phonocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude cardiac valve prosthesis. Chest 80: 272–277, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlson EB, Mintz GS & Bemis CE: Hemodynamic significance of normal and abnormal fluoroscopic patterns of disc motion in the Beall mitral valve prosthesis. Radiology 141: 335–339, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkataraman K, Beer R, Matthews N, Carl J, Hamson E, Turner AF & Finck E: Thrombosis of Bjork-Shiley aortic valve prosthesis. Radiology 137: 43–47, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hylen J: Mechanical malfunction and thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves. Am J Cardiol 30: 396–402, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Commerford PJ, Lloyd EA & DeNobrega JA: Thrombosis of St. Jude Medical cardiac valve in the mitral position. Chest 80: 326–327, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gimenez JL, Soulen RL & Darila JC: Prosthetic valve detachment: Its roentgenographic recognition. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 103: 595–600, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    White AF, Dinsmore R & Buckley MJ: Cineradiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Circulation 48: 882–890, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehta A, Kessler KM, Tamer D, Pefkaros K, Kessler RM & Myerburg RJ: Two-dimensional echocardiographic observations in major detachment of a prosthetic aortic valve. Am Heart J 101: 231–233, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen CC, Morganroth J & Pauletto FJ: Embolized disc from a Beall mitral valve prosthesis. Chest 81: 108–110, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tri TB, Schatz RA, Watson TD, Bowen TE & Schiller NB: Echocardiographic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve. Chest 80: 278–284, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller FA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB, Callahan JA, Schattenberg TT, Shub C, Giuliani ER & Pluth JR: Prosthetic valve dysfunction: Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment. Circulation 64:IV-315, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schapira JN, Martin RP, Fowles RE, Rakowski H, Stinson EB, French JW, Shunway NE & Popp RL: Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of patients with bioprosthetic valves. Am J Cardiol 43: 510–519, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alam M, Madrazo AC, Magilligan DJ & Goldstein S: M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic features of porcine valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 43: 502–509, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahn DJ, Roche T, Brandt PWT, Friedman M, Valdes-Cruz LM, Allen HD & Goldberg SJ: Detection of deterioration or infection of bioprosthetic valves in mitral and aortic positions by 2D echo. Circulation 64:IV-315, 1981.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry LW, Midgley FM, Galioto FM Jr, Shapiro SR, Ruckman RN & Scott LP III: Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of mitral bioprosthetic function in infants and children. Am Heart J 102: 1022–1028, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Angell WW & Angell JD: Porcine valves. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 23: 141–166, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams JB, Karp RB, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico AD, Zorn GL Jr, Blackstone EH, Brown RN, Piantadosi S & Bradley EL: Considerations in selection and management of patients undergoing valve replacement with glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 30: 247–258, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunn JM: Porcine valve durability in children. Ann Thoracic Surg 32: 357–368, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magilligan DJ Jr, Lewis JW Jr, Jara FN, Lee MW, Alam M, Riddle JM & Stein P: Spontaneous degeneration of porcine bioprosthetic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 30: 259–266, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martin RP, French JW & Popp RL: Clinical utility of two-dimensional echocardiography in patients with bioprosthetic valves. Adv Cardiol 27: 294–304, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alam M, Goldstein S & Lakier JB: Echocardiographic changes in the thickness of porcine valves with time. Chest 79: 663–668, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary S. Mintz
  • Morris N. Kotler
  • Bernard L. Segal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations