Abstract
When it is frequently said, following Kuhn, that social science in general, and psychology in particular, is in a preparadigmatic phase, this may be interpreted to mean that there are no widely accepted general theories covering important areas. Psychology and other social sciences appear to suffer from the added disadvantage that not only are such theories and paradigms lacking, but professional members of these groups often regard this lack of theory as a virtue and proclaim a lack of interest in theories in general, adopting a low-level sort of empirical pragmatism.
This paper argues for the vital importance of theory in psychology and gives a number of examples to demonstrate the empirical value of such theories in gaining new and better knowledge. To quote Lewin’s famous saying: “There is nothing more practical than a good theory” This is extended to empirical research as well as to practical application, and it is suggested that psychology should be more interested in theories, generate theories more readily, and come to grips with the general importance of theories in scientific work. Only in this way, it is suggested, can psychology join the ranks of the properly accredited sciences and take its rightful place.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P. (1965). The problem of theoretical terms. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 193–203.
Baker, J. R. (1974). Race. London: Oxford University Press.
Bergman, G. (1951). The logic of psychological concepts. Philosophy of Science, 18, 93 – 110.
Bergman, G. (1954). The metaphysics of logical positivism. New York: Longman, Green.
Bergman, G. (1957). Philosophy of science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bergman, G., & Spence, K. (1941). Operationism and theory in psychology. Psychological Review, 48, 1–14.
Bernal, J. P. (1969). Science in history(4 vols.). London: C. A. Watts & Co.
Blackmore, J. T. (1972). Ernst Mach. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boudon, R. (1973). Education, opportunity, and social equality. London: Wiley.
Caplan, A. C. (Ed.). (1978). The sociobiology debate. London: Harper & Row.
Carnap, R. (1962). Logical foundations of probability. New York: Basic Books.
Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Basic Books.
Cohen, M. R., & Nagel, N. (1936). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671 – 684.
Darlington, C. D. (1969). The evolution of man and society. London: Allen & Unwin.
Dashiell, J. F. (1938). Some rapprochements in contemporary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 1–24.
Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249, 288–289.
Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1975). The nature of extraversion: A genetical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 102–112.
Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Genotype-environmental model for psychoticism. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1, 5 – 26.
Eddington, A. (1920). Space, time and gravitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1939). Primary mental abilities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 270–275.
Eysenck, H. J. (1950). Criterion analysis—An application of the hypothetico-deductive method to factor analysis. Psychological Review, 57, 38–53.
Eysenck, H. J. (1957). Dynamics of anxiety and hysteria. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck, H; J. (1959). Serial position effects in nonsense syllable learning as a function of interlist rest pauses. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 360–362
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: C. C Thomas.
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of -personality. London: Methuen.
Eysenck, H. J. (1975a). The inequality of man. London: Temple Smith.
Eysenck, H. J. (1975b). The measurement of emotion: Psychological parameters and methods. In L. Levi (Ed.), Emotions—Their parameters and measurement. New York: Raven Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976a). The learning theory model of neurosis—A new approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 251 – 267.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976b). The measurement of personality. Lancaster: Medical and Technical Publishers.
Eysenck, H. J. (1977). You and neurosis. London: Temple Smith.
Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The conditioning model of neurosis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 155 – 199.
Eysenck, H. J. (1980). A unified theory of psychotherapy, behaviour therapy and spontaneous remission. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 188, 43 – 56.
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). A model for personality. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.). (1983). A model for intelligence. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (1985). The theory of intelligence and the psychophysiology of cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). Psychophysiology and the measurement of intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds & V. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Frith, C. D. (1977). Reminiscence, motivation and personality. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1973). The experimental study of Freudian theories. London: Methuen.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1978). The psychological basis of ideology. Lancaster: Medical and Technical Publishers. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. London: New Left Books.
Greenaway, F. (1966). John Dalton and the atom. London: Heinemann.
Griinbaum, A. (1976). Is falsifiability the touchstone of scientific rationality? Karl Popper versus inductivism. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend, and M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos. Dordrecht: R. Reidel.
Grünbaum, A. (1977). How scientific is psychoanalysis? In R. Stern, L. Horowitz, and J. Lynes (Eds.), Science and psychotherapy. New York: Haven Press.
Grünbaum, A. (1979). Is Freudian-psychoanalytic theory pseudo-scientific by Karl Popper’s criterion of demarcation? American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 131 – 141.
Grünbaum, A. (1981). Can psychoanalytic theory be cogently tested “on the couch”? In A. Grünbaum & L. Landon (Eds.), Pittsburgh series in philosophy and history of science. San Francisco: University of California Press.
Guthke, J. (1978). 1st Intelligenz Messbar? Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harré, R. (1975). Problems of scientific revolutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hempel, C. G. (1952). Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. In C. G. Hempel (Ed.), Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hunter, J. E. (1979). An analysis of validity, differential validity, test fairness, and utility for the Philadelphia Police Officers Selection Examination prepared by the Educational Testing Service. Report to the Philadelphia Federal District Court, Alvaraz v. City of Philadelphia.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1980). Fitting people to jobs: The impact of personnel selection on national productivity. In E. A. Fleishman (Ed.), Human performance and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1962). Extra version, neuroticism and social learning. Acta Psychologica, 20, 69 – 77.
Jensen, A. R. (1981a). Test validity, g versus the specificity doctrine. Invited address, Division 14, presented at the annual convention of the A.P.A., Los Angeles, August 26.
Jensen, A. R. (1981b). Taboo, constraint and responsibility in educational research. New Horizons, No. 22, 11 – 20.
Kamin, L. J. (1974). The science and politics of I. Q. London: Wiley.
Kamin, L. J. (1981). In H. J. Eysenck & L. J. Kamin (Eds.), The intelligence controversy. New York: Wiley.
Kazdin, A. E. (1978). History of behavior modification. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Kazdin, A. E., & Wilson, G. T. (1978). Evaluation of behavior therapy. New York: Ballinger.
Krige, J. (1980). Science, revolution and discontinuity. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Krutezki, W. A. (1974). Die Entwicklung Leninscher Ideen in der sowjetischen Psychologie der Fahigkeiten. In W. A. Krutezki (Ed.), Lenins philosophisches Erbe und Ergebnisse der sowjetischen Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (Ed.). (1968). The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lenin, W. I. (1965). Ein liberaler Professor uber die Gleichheit. In W. I. Lenin (Ed.), Werke(Bd. 20 ). Berlin: V.E.B.
Lipovechaya, N. G., Kantonistova, N. C., & Chamaganova, T. G. (1978). The role of heredity and environment in the determination of intellectual functions. Medicinskie Problemy Formirovanija Livcnosti, 48–59.
Mackenzie, D. A. (1981). Statistics in Britain: 1865–1930. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
MacLean, P. D. (1973). A triune concept of the brain and behavior: Including psychology of memory and sleep and dreaming. In T. J. Bord & D. Campbell (Eds.), Brain and behavior. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Marrow, A. (1969). The practical theorist. New York: Basic Books.
Mather, K., & Jinks, J. L. (1971). Biometrical genetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
Mehlhorn, G., & Mehlhorn, H. (1981). Intelligenz. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. R. (1974a). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. R. (1974b). Replies to my critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle: Open Court Publishing.
Putnam, H. (1962). What theories are not. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Stanford: Stanford Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1962). From a logical point of view. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rachman, S., & Wilson, T. (1981). The effects of psychological therapy. New York & London: Pergamon Press.
Roley, T. B. (1959). An opinion on the construction of behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 14, 129–134.
Rosenbaum, G. (1953). Stimulus generalization as a function of level of experimentally induced anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45,35–43.
Rosenbaum, G. (1956). Stimulus generalization as a function of clinical anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53,281–285.
Savage, R. D., & Eysenck, H. J. (1964). The definition and measurement of emotionality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Experiments in motivation. London: Pergamon Press.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). New research findings in personnel selection: Myths meet realities in the 1980s. Public Personnel Administration: Policies and Procedures for Personnel. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.
Spence, K. W. (1944). The nature of theory construction in contemporary psychology. Psychological Review, 51, 47 – 68.
Suppe, F. (1974). The structure of scientific theories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Tarski, A. (1941). Introduction to logic and to the methodology of deductive sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tarski, A. (1956). Logic, semantics, metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Thorndike, E. L. (1903). Educational psychology. New York: Teachers College.
Toulmin, S. (1953). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson
Vaucouleurs, G. de (1957). Discovery of the universe. London: Faber.
Williams, L. P. (1965). Michael Faraday. London: Chapman & Hall.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. London: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. London: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eysenck, H.J. (1985). The Place of Theory in a World of Facts. In: Madsen, K.B., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2487-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2487-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9507-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2487-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive