Advertisement

Present Orientedness and Crime

  • Edward C. Banfield

Abstract

Since the seventeenth century, political philosophers have maintained that an irrational bias toward present as opposed to future satisfactions is natural to both men and animals and is a principal cause of crime and, more generally, of threats to the peace and order of society.1 It is to protect men against this irrationality that civil government exists. Hume makes the fullest statement of the case. All men, he says, have a “natural infirmity”—indeed a “violent propension”—that causes them to be unduly affected by stimuli near to them in time or space; this is the “source of all dissoluteness and disorder, repentence and misery,” and because it prompts men to prefer any trivial present advantage to the maintenance of order, it is “very dangerous to society.” Government is the means by which men cope with this defect of their nature.

Keywords

Civil Government Cultural Style Illegitimacy Rate Moral Scruple Sensuous Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 3.
    George Ainslie, “Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control,”Psychological Bulletin82 (1975): 463–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    Harrison G. Gough, “A Sociological Theory of Psychopathy,”American Journal of Sociology53 (March 1948): 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 8.
    Henry Mayhew,London Labour and the London Poorvol. 1 (London: Griffin and Co., 1851), 4.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Jack E. Weller,Yesterday s People, Life in Contemporary Appalachia(Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Alexis de Tocqueville,Democracy in America, vol. 2 (New York: Knopf, 1948), Chapter 17.Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    Bettleheim, in eds. Nancy F. and Theodore R. Sizer,Moral Education(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), 90.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Friedrich Nietzsche,The Genealogy of Morals(New York: Macmillan, 1987), essay 2, sec. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward C. Banfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations