Advertisement

The Political Implications of Metropolitan Growth

  • Edward C. Banfield

Abstract

The rapid growth of the metropolitan populations will not necessarily have much political effect. To be sure, many new facilities, especially schools, highways, and water supply and sewage disposal systems, will have to be built and much private activity will have to be regulated. But such things do not necessarily have anything to do with politics: the laying of a sewer pipe by a “public” body may involve the same kinds of behavior as the manufacture of the pipe by a “private” one. Difficulties that are “political” arise (and they may arise in “private” as well as in “public” undertakings) only insofar as there is conflict—conflict over what the common good requires or between what it requires and what private interests want. The general political situation is affected, therefore, not by changes in population density or in the number and complexity of the needs that government serves (“persons,” the human organisms whose noses are counted by census-takers, are not necessarily “political actors”) but rather by actions which increase conflict in matters of public importance or make the management of it more difficult. In what follows, such actions will be called “burdens” upon the political system.

Keywords

Political System Lower Class Central Business District American City Ordinary Citizen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 5.
    Sir Geoffrey Crowther, “English and American Education,” The Atlantic (April 1960).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution, in Bagehot’s Works (Hartford, Conn., Travellers Insurance Co., 1889), Vol. 4, pp. 267–268.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    James Q. Wilson,A Report on Politics in Los Angeles(Cambridge: Joint Center for Urban Studies of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, 1959), 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. 13.
    Norton E. Long, “The Local Community as an Ecology of Games,”American Journal of Sociology, 64 (1958): 252.Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    E. C. Banfield and M. Grodzins,Government and Housing in Metropolitan Areas, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958), esp. chs. 3 and 4.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    Don K. Price, “The Promotion of the City Manager Plan,”Public Opinion Quarterly(Winter 1941): 563–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward C. Banfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations