Rotational Relaxation of NO in Seeded, Pulsed Nozzle Beams

  • H. W. Lülf
  • P. Andresen


In the last few years pulsed nozzle beams became an important experimental tool in spectroscopy, especially in connection with the development of pulsed high power lasers. High momentary intensity at moderate pumping speed, good cooling and control of dimerisation by large nozzles are only some of the important advantages. Several different designs for pulsed valves have been realized to produce short gas pulses in the submillisecond range1–3, but still little is known about hydrodynamic properties of these beams. They do depend on the details of the design, and it is known today that ultrashort gas pulses do not give good nozzle beams1. Theoretical estimates have been made about the time that is necessary to come to a stationary behaviour of the expansion4. We want to present a method that gives some insight into the dynamics of these beams. We study in detail the features of the pulsed valve designed by Smalley2 by looking with LIF at the rotational relaxation of NO in very dilute mixtures with He and Ar. LIF is an ideal probe because the molecules can be detected without any interference with the beam.


Rotational State Rotational Temperature Rotational Relaxation Pulse Valve Pulse High Power Laser 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    C.F. Giese, P. Chow, IX International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, Vol. 2, p. 964Google Scholar
  2. W.R. Gentry, C.F. Giese, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 49, 595 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. W.R. Gentry, C.F. Giese, J. Chem. Phys., 67, 5389 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 2).
    M.G. Liverman, S.M. Beck, D.L. Monts, R.E. Smalley, In “Rarefied Gas Dynamics”, Vol. 2, 1037 (1978)Google Scholar
  5. 3).
    J.B. Cross, J.J. Valentini, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 53, 38 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. R.L. Byer, M.D. Duncan, J. Chem. Phys., 74, 2174 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 4).
    K.L. Saenger, J. Chem. Phys., 75, 2467 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5).
    D.R. Miller, R.P. Andres, J. Chem. Phys., 46, 3418 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Aerts, H. Hulsman, In “Rarefied Gas Dynamics”, Vol. 2, 925 (1978)Google Scholar
  10. 6).
    H. Rabitz, S.H. Lam, J. Chem. Phys., 63, 3532 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Koura, Phys. Fluids, 24, 401 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Lang, In “Rarefied Gas Dynamics”, Vol. 2, 823 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. T.E. Gough, R.E. Miller, G. Scoles, Appl. Phys. Letters, 30, 338 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. T.E. Gough, R.E. Miller, G. Scoles, J. Mol. Spectr.,72, 124 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 7).
    H. Zacharias, A. Andres, J.B. Halpern, K.H. Welge, Optics Communications, 19, 116 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 8).
    R.J.M. Bennet, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 147, 35 (1970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 9).
    R.J. Gallagher, J.B. Fenn, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 3487 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R.J. Gallagher, J.B. Fenn, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 3492 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. M. Quah, Chem. Phys. Letters, 63, 141 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 10).
    H. Ashkenas, F.S. Sherman, In “Rarefied Gas Dynamics”, Vol. 2, 84 (1966)Google Scholar
  21. P.K. Sharma, W.S. Young, W.E. Rodgers, E.L. Knuth, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 341 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. Lülf
    • 1
  • P. Andresen
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Strömungsforschung GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations