Skip to main content

Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of the Arabidopsis Assay in the Identification of Carcinogens

  • Chapter
Book cover Mutation, Cancer, and Malformation

Part of the book series: Environmental Science Research ((ESRH,volume 31))

Summary

In 61 laboratories using a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic short-term assays a maximum of 42 chemicals were tested. The purpose of the study was to identify the best battery of assays for screening carcinogens. None of the assay systems correctly identified all the proven carcinogens or “noncarcinogens”. The individual assays were characterized by sensitivity (% of correct identification of carcinogens), specificity (% of correct identification of “noncarcinogens”), predictivity (% of carcinogens correctly identified among all the compounds tested) and hypersensitivity (% of compounds classified as carcinogens among all the compounds tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashby, J. , P. A. Lefevre, B. M. Elliott, and J. A. Styles (1982) An overview of the chemical and biological reactivity of 4CMB and structurally related compounds: Possible relevance to the overall findings of the UKEMS 1981 study.Mutation Res. 100: 417 – 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, J. , and D. Paton (1981) Selection, preparation, and purity of the test chemicals, pp. 8–15, in ref. no. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auerbach, C. , and J. M. Robson (1944) Production of mutation by allyl isothiocyanate.Nature154: 81 – 82.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boveri, T. (1929)The Origin of Malignant Tumors,. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burdette, W. J. (1955) The significance of mutation in relation to the origin of tumors: A review.Cancer Res. 15: 201 – 226.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, J. A. , II, R. Saracci, and P. Cole (1979) Describing the validity of carcinogen screening tests.Br. J. Cancer39: 87 – 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Serres, F. J. , and J. Ashby, Eds. (1981)Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens. Report of the International Collaborative Program. Elsevier/North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hodes, L. (1981) Computer-aided selection of compounds for antitumor screening: Validation of a statistical-heuristic method.J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 21: 128 – 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollaender, A. , Ed. ( 1971 on)Chemical Mutagens.Principles and Methods for Their Detection. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maugh, T. H. (1983) How many chemicals are there?Science199: 162.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maugh, T. H. (1983) Hew many chemicals are there?Science220: 293.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Plewa, M. J. (1978) Activation of chemicals into mutagens by green plants: A preliminary discussion.Env. Health Persp. 27: 45 – 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Plewa, M. J. , D. L. Weaver, L. C. Blair, and J. M. Gentile (1983) Activation of 2-aminofluorene by cultured plant cells.Science219: 1427 – 1429.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Purchase, I. F. H. (1980) Inter-species comparison of carcinogenicity.Br. J. Cancer41: 454 – 468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purchase, I. F. H. (1982) An appraisal of predictive tests for carcinogenicity.Mutation Res. 99: 53 – 71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Redei, G. P. (1982) Gene number estimates based on mutation frequencies inArabidopsis. Genetics100, Suppl. 1, Pt. 2, s56 – s57.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Redei, G. P. , M. M. Redei, W. R. Lcwer, and S. Sandhu (1980) Identification of carcinogens by mutagenicity forArabidopsis. Mutation Res. 74: 469 – 475.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, M. (1983) What happens when cellular oncogenes collide with immunoglobulin genes.Nature302: 474 – 475.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scherr, G. H. , M. Fishman, and R. H. Weaver (1954) The mutagenicity of some carcinogenic compounds forEscherichia coli. Genetics39: 141 – 149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Selkirk, J. K. , and M. C. MacLeod (1982) Chemical carcinogenesis: Nature’s metabolic mistake.Bioscience32: 601 – 605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stich, H. F. A. , and R. H. C. San, Eds. (1981)Short-Term Tests for Chemical Carcinogens, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Streisinger, G. (1983) Extrapolations from species to species and from various cell types in assessing risks from chemical mutagens.Mutation Res. 114: 93 – 105.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tomatis, L. , C. Agthe, H. Bartsch, J. Huff, R. Montesano, R. Saracci, E. Vklker, and J. Wilbourn (1978) Evaluation of carcinogenicity of chemicals: A review of the monograph program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (1971–1977).Cancer Res, 38: 877 - 885.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weisburger, J. H. , and G. M. Williams (1980) Chemical carcinogens, inCasarett and Doull1s Toxicology, J. Doull, C. D. Klaassen, and M. O. Amdur, Eds. /Macmillan, New York, pp. 84 – 138.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wildeman/ A. G. /and R. N. Nazar (1982) Significance of plant metabolism in the mutagenicity and toxicity of pesticides.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24: 437 – 449.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wright, A. S. (1980) The role of metabolism in chemical mutagenesis and chemical carcinogenesis.Mutation Res. 75: 215 – 241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rédei, G.P., Acedo, G.N., Sandhu, S.S. (1984). Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of the Arabidopsis Assay in the Identification of Carcinogens. In: Chu, E.H.Y., Generoso, W.M. (eds) Mutation, Cancer, and Malformation. Environmental Science Research, vol 31. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2399-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2399-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9463-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2399-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics