Abstract
When we think about social interdependence and decision making we often tend to think about game theory in contrast to decision theory. Game theory, after all, is the analysis of decision making and strategic planning in environments that are not neutral or indifferent to our goals and actions. These environments consist of others who have their own plans, intentions, and strategies, and of others with whom we must effectively cope to be effective decision makers. Game theory is limited, however, in that is normally begins with assumptions about the preferences of the persons involved, about what the persons know about each other, and about the form of the interdependence that exists among the participants. It does not deal with the problem of how the preferences came about in the first place, for example, or the conditions under which people will opt to change the nature of their interdependence. These two issues are the two foci of this chapter.
Keywords
- Relative Deprivation
- Approval Vote
- Plurality Vote
- Replenishment Rate
- False Feedback
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic Press.
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
Austin, W., McGinn, N. C., & Susmilch, C. (1980). Internal standards revisited: Effect of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 426–441.
Brams, S. J. (1975). Game theory and politics. New York: Free Press.
Brams, S. J. (1976). Paradoxes in politics. New York: Free Press.
Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1983). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhauser.
Colman, A. (1982). Game theory and experimental games. Oxford: Pergamon.
Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cross, J. C., & Guyer, M. J. (1980). Social traps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Davidson, D., Suppes, P., & Siegel, S. (1957). Decision making: An experimental approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Festinger, L. A. (1954). Theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Hamburger, H. (1979). Games as models of social phenomena. San Francisco: Freeman.
Hardin. G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607–622.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hornstein, H. A. (1972). Promotive tension: The basis of prosocial behavior from a Lewinian perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 191–218.
Hornstein, H. A. (1976). Cruelty and kindness. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1134–1146.
Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Martin, J., & Murray, A. (1983). Distributive justice and unfair exchange. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory. New York: Praeger.
McClintock, C. G., Messick, D. M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Campos, F. T. (1973). Motivational bases of choice in three-choice decomposed games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 572–590.
Messé, L. A., & Watts, B. L. (1983). Complex nature of the sense of fairness: Internal standards and social comparison as bases for reward evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 84–93.
Messick, D. M. (1972). A stochastic model of preference in decomposed games. In Sauermann, H. (Ed.), Contributions to experimental economics (Vol. 3 ). Tübingen: Mohr.
Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11–44.
Messick, D. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (1983). Equity theory. New York: Praeger.
Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25.
Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418–434.
Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1983a). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory. New York: Praeger.
Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1983b). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. Unpublished manuscript.
Messick, D. M., & Thorngate, W. (1967). Relative gain maximizations in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85–101.
Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294–309.
Mosteller, F., & Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 371–404.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parker, R., Lui, L., Messick, C., Messick, D. M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R., Samuelson, C., & Wilke, H. (1983). A computer laboratory for studying resource dilemmas. Behavioral Science, 28, 298–304.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory: Convergence and applications. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Piatt, J. Social traps. (1973). American Psychologist, 28, 641–651.
Reynolds, H. T. (1983). A proposal for elections ( Review of Approval voting). Science, 221, 450–451.
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1973). An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94–104.
Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Siegel, S. (1957). Level of aspiration and decision making. Psychological Review, 64, 253–262.
Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Work originally published in 1759 )
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Stouffer, S., Lumsdaine, A., Lumsdaine, M., William, R., Smith, M., Janis, I., Star, S., & Cot- trell, L. (1949). The American soldier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977). Social comparison processes. New York: Wiley.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
van Avermaet, E. (1974). Equity: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Messick, D.M. (1985). Social Interdependence and Decision Making. In: Wright, G. (eds) Behavioral Decision Making. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9460-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2391-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive