Skip to main content

Problems in Avian Classification

  • Chapter
Current Ornithology

Part of the book series: Current Ornithology ((CUOR,volume 2))

Abstract

That the higher-level classification of birds is in an unsatisfactory state is clearly demonstrated by the continued proliferation of new classifications and by the failure of biologists in general to adopt any one system as standard. Recent years have seen comprehensive classifications by Mayr and Amadon (1951), Stresemann (1959), Wetmore (1960), Storer (1971), Morony et al. (1975), Wolters (1975–82), Cracraft (1981), and others. The Peters’ checklist and the American Ornithologists’ Union checklist continue to evolve, and many attempts have been made to reclassify avian subgroups. Pizzey (1980, p. 13) stated that “The classification of birds (avian taxonomy) is in some ways like the peace of God—it passeth all understanding.” Olson (1981, p. 193) agreed with this sentiment, but also recognized the basic reason: “… the present classification of birds amounts to little more than superstition and bears about as much relationship to a true phylogeny of the Class Aves as Greek mythology does to the theory of relativity.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amadon, D., 1950, The Hawaiian Honeycreepers (Aves, Drepaniidae), Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.95(4): 151 – 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Ornithologists’ Union, 1983, Check-list of North American birds, 6th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashlock, P. D., 1971, Monophyly and associated terms, Syst. Zool. 20: 63 – 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., 1960, The palatine process of the premaxilla in the passeres, Bull. Mus. Com p. Zool. 122(8): 361 – 488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., 1973, Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification, Syst. Zool. 22: 375 – 392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., 1982, Biological classification, in: Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Volume 2 ( S. P. Parker, ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 1067 – 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., Farrand, J., Jr., 1980, The number of species and genera of recent birds: A contribution to comparative systematics, Am. Mus. Novitates 2703: 1 – 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1981, Toward a phylogenetic classification of the recent birds of the world (Class Aves), Auk 98: 681 – 714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1982, Phylogenetic relationships and monophyly of loons, grebes, and hesperornithiform birds, with comments on the early history of birds, Syst. Zool. 31: 35 – 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1983, The significance of phylogenetic classifications for systematic and evolutionary biology, in: Numerical Taxonomy, NATO ASI Series, Volume Gl ( J. Felsenstein, ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., Eldredge, N. (eds.), 1979, Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R. A., 1982, Computers versus imagination in the reconstruction of phylogeny, in: Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction( K. A. Joysey, A. E. Friday, eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 245 – 255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., Cracraft, J. (eds.), 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, D. T., 1978, Asitys, in: Bird Families of the World( C. J. O. Harrison, ed.), Harry N. Abrams, New York, pp. 184 – 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1969, Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1981, Biological classification: Toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies, Science 214: 510 – 516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., Amadon, D., 1951, A classification of recent birds, Am. Mus. Novitates 1496: 1 – 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morony, J. J., Jr., Bock, W. J., Farrand, J., Jr., 1975, Reference List of the Birds of the World, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. J., 1973, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships, Syst. Zool. 22: 344 – 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. L., 1981, The museum tradition in ornithology—A response to Ricklefs, Auk 98: 193 – 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. L., 1983, Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Piciformes, Auk 100:126–133,

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C., 1982, Cladistics and classification, New Scientist, 94:303–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. L., 1931, Check-list of Birds of the World, Harvard University Press and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzey, G., 1980, A Field Guide to the Birds of Australia, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J., 1977, The origin and evolution of the Hawaiian Honeycreepers (Drepan- ididae), Living Bird 15: 95 – 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J., 1978, Appendicular myology and relationships of the New World nine-primaried oscines (Aves: Passeriformes), Bull. Carnegie Mus. 7: 1 – 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J., 1981, Old birds and new ideas: Progress and controversy in paleornithology, Wilson Bull. 93: 407 – 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J., 1982, Monophyly of the Passeriformes: Test of a phylogenetic hypothesis, Auk 99: 431 – 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J., Cracraft, J., 1983, Monophyly of the Piciformes: A reply to Olson, Auk 100: 134 – 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Ahlquist, J. E., 1983, Phylogeny and classification of birds based on the data of DNA-DNA hybridization, Curr. Ornithol. 1: 245 – 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. F., Cracraft,J., 1981, The phylogenetic relationships of the Piciformes (Class Aves), Auk, 98: 481 – 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973, Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, R. W., 1971, Classification of birds, in: Avian Biology, Volume 1, ( D. S. Famer and J. R. King, eds.), Academic Press, New York, London, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann, E., 1959, The status of avian systematics and its unsolved problems, Auk 76: 269 – 280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierczewski, E. V., Raikow, R. J., 1981, Hind limb morphology, phylogeny, and classification of the Piciformes, Auk 98: 466 – 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, A., 1960, A classification for the birds of the world, Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 139(11):1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O., 1981, Phylogenetics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, H. E., 1975–82, Die Vogelarten der Erde, Paul Parey, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. S., 1983, Phenetic relationships within the Ciconiidae, (Aves), Ann. Carnegie Mus.52 (5): 79 – 112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raikow, R.J. (1985). Problems in Avian Classification. In: Johnston, R.F. (eds) Current Ornithology. Current Ornithology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2385-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2385-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9457-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2385-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics