Psychiatry pp 277-282 | Cite as

Victims of Torture and Their Rehabilitation

  • Robert J. Daly

Abstract

International declarations prescribing torture, while necessary and useful, have had little effect on the practice of torture in 50 or more countries around the world. It would seem that the equalising balance of nuclear power, and corresponding increase in subversion or insurgency have resulted in increasing levels of counter-insurgency operations by security forces. Man has always been willing to invest immense treasure, ingenuity and creativity in the waging of war. Of course insurgency is not exclusively a modern phenomenon and some techniques of interrogation of prisoners are as old as mankind. Techniques often have both a psychological and physical basis, and Amnesty International (I) and others have widely published the details of physical tortures, some new, some old, but all equally abhorrent. Often sexual assault and humiliations, rigid control, threats and promises are combined with physical pain through beating and painful postures. Deprivation of sensation, food, water and sleep combined with other techniques have been known for centuries as methods of coercion. Their systematic use seems to have reached a higher level of intensity than previously known.

Keywords

Depression Income Shrinkage Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amnesty International Report on Torture. Duckworth, London,1973.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. J. Daly, “Psychiatric Effects of Counter-Insurgency Operations”. American Psychiatric Association AGM, Miami,May 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.J. Dally “Compensation and Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture. An Example of preventive psychiatry”. Danish Med. Bulletin.27.5:245–248. 1980Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. J. Daly, “Torture and other forms of Inhuman and Degrading Treatment”. Proceedings of the WHO Working Group on Psychosocial Consequence of Violence. Martinus Nijhoff. Hague. 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Court of Human Rights. Report of Commission, adopted on 25th January, 1976. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Court of Human Rights Judgement 18th January, 1978. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.P. Bastiaans, Psychosomatische Gevolgen van Onderdrukking en Verzet. N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij- Amsterdam, 1957.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Eitinger and A. Strom. “Mortality and Morbidity after Excessive Stress”. Humanities Press. New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. J. Daly, “Samuel Pepys and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder” Brit.J.Psychiat. 143: 64–68. 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Miller, “Transport Accidents”. Brit Med J. 1: 919–925. 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Medical Sequelae of Torture”. Editorial, Lancet:i,140,1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Daly
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Psychiatry, Regional HospitalUniversity College, CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations