Advertisement

The Management of Q-Wave Versus Non-Q-Wave Infarction

  • Robert Roberts
  • Craig M. Pratt
Part of the Acute Coronary Care Updates book series (ACCU, volume 2)

Abstract

For some time, myocardial infarction has by convention been referred to as subendocardial (nontransmural) or transmural infarction. This is an electrocardiographs classification in which patients with an infarction accompanied by Q-waves on the electrocardiogram are said to have a transmural and those without a Q-wave a subendocardial, or nontransmural, infarction. Despite being an electrocardiographs classification, it has pathological implications (1). Experimental and clinical data do not show a consistent relationship between transmural myocardial injury and the development of Q-waves or vice versa (2). However, patients with infarction manifesting only ST-T changes have less extensive damage (infarct size). Thus, it has been suggested to classify infarction as Q-wave infarction (transmural) or non-Q-wave (nontransmural). Myocardial infarction occurring in association with new Q-waves of 30 msec duration or greater is referred to as Q-wave infarction. Myocardial infarction associated with ST-T changes without the development of new Q-waves will be referred to as non-Q-wave infarction. Patients with previous Q-wave infarction developing new changes but restricted to those leads with previous Q-waves will be classified as indeterminate. However, if the new changes are in leads other than those associated with previous Q-waves, the above classification would be appropriate.

Keywords

Creatine Kinase Infarct Size Creatine Kinase Activity Coronary Care Unit Plasma Creatine Kinase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Roberts WC, Gardin JM. Am J Cardiol 42:868, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spodick DH. Am J Cardiol 51:913, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herrick JB. JAMA 72:387, 1919.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levine SA. Medicine 8:245, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pardee HEB. Am J Mec Sci 169:270, 1925.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    LaDue JS, Wroblewski F, Karmen A. Science 120:497, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts R. Heart & Lung 10:486–506, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roberts R. In: Techniques in the Life Sciences: Techniques in Cardiovascular Physiology, Part I (Linden RJ, ed), Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Ireland Ltd., 1983, pp 312/1–312/24.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutter AM, DeSanctis RW, Flynn T, et al. Am J Cardiol 48:595, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pratt CM, Roberts R. Baylor College of Medicine Cardiology Series, 8(5):5–23, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plarmor A, Sobel BE, Roberts R. Am J Cardiol 48:603–610, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marmor A, Geltman EM, Schechtman K, et al. Circulation 66:415–421, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maisel AS, Ahnve S, Gilpin E, et al. Circulation 71:211, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roberts R. Newsletter of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Volume 11, No. 1, SC-85-CLC, January 1985, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts R, Gibson RS, Boden WE, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:68A, 1986 (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Roberts
    • 1
  • Craig M. Pratt
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of CardiologyBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations