Accuracy of Diagnostic Techniques with Follow-Up and Evaluation of Disease Recurrence
The impact of disease extent on survival is clear. Thus, the accurate assessment and reporting of the extent of metastatic disease in the liver and its response to therapy are critical in interpreting and comparing data from individual studies. The criteria for evaluating therapeutic response are dependent on the sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnostic techniques used for follow-up and evaluation of recurrent disease. Recent innovations in technology have made newer approaches possible. This chapter will review those diagnostic techniques available for patient follow-up and for evaluating tumor recurrence. An overview is provided on the diagnostic accuracy of radionuclide imaging, sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
KeywordsLymphoma Adenocarcinoma Oncol Radionuclide Barium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Hoth DF, Petrucci PE: Natural history and staging of colon cancer. Sennin Oncol 3: 331–335, 1976.Google Scholar
- 5.Mayes GB, Zornoza J: Computed tomography of colon carcinoma. Am J Radiol 135: 1980.Google Scholar
- 9.Bernardino ME, Chuang V, Wallace S, Thomas JL, Soo C-S: Therapeutically infarcted tumors: CT findings. Am J Radiol 136: 527, 1981.Google Scholar
- 12.Bernardino ME: Percutaneous biopsy. Am J Radiol 142: 41–45, 1984.Google Scholar
- 14.Bernardino ME, Small W, Goldstein J, Sewell CW, Sones PJ, Gedgaudas-McClees K, Galambos JT, Wenger J, Casareila WJ: Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue. Am J Radiol 141: 1203–1208, 1983.Google Scholar