Accuracy of Diagnostic Techniques with Follow-Up and Evaluation of Disease Recurrence

  • Michael E. Bernardino
Part of the Developments in Oncology book series (DION, volume 42)


The impact of disease extent on survival is clear. Thus, the accurate assessment and reporting of the extent of metastatic disease in the liver and its response to therapy are critical in interpreting and comparing data from individual studies. The criteria for evaluating therapeutic response are dependent on the sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnostic techniques used for follow-up and evaluation of recurrent disease. Recent innovations in technology have made newer approaches possible. This chapter will review those diagnostic techniques available for patient follow-up and for evaluating tumor recurrence. An overview is provided on the diagnostic accuracy of radionuclide imaging, sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.


Comput Assist Pelvic Mass Radionuclide Imaging Pelvic Sidewall Elevated White Cell Count 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Husband JE, Hodson NJ, Parsons CA: The use of computed tomography in recurrent rectal tumors. Radiology 134: 677–682, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoth DF, Petrucci PE: Natural history and staging of colon cancer. Sennin Oncol 3: 331–335, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cass AW, Million RR, Pfaff WW: Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinonna of the colon and rectum. Cancer 37: 2861–2863, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moss AA, Theoni RF, Schnyder P, Margulis AR: Value of computed tomography in the detection and staging of recurrent rectal carcinomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 870–874, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayes GB, Zornoza J: Computed tomography of colon carcinoma. Am J Radiol 135: 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman MA, Resser KJ, Marcus TS, Moss AA, Cann CE: How accurate are computed tomographic scans in assessment of changes in tumor size? Am J Med 75: 193–198, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moss AA, Cann CE, Friedman MA, Marcus FS, Resser KJ, Berninger W: Volumetric CT analysis of hepatic tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 714–718, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakamura H, Tanaka T, Hori S, Yoshioka H, Kuroda C, Okamura J, Sakurai M: Transcatheter embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of efficacy in cases of resection following embolization. Radiology 147: 401–405, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernardino ME, Chuang V, Wallace S, Thomas JL, Soo C-S: Therapeutically infarcted tumors: CT findings. Am J Radiol 136: 527, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis E, Bernardino ME, Salvador PG, Cabanillas FF, Barnes PA, Thomas JL: Post- therapy CT-detected mass in lymphoma patients: Is it viable tissue? J Comput Assist Tomogr 6: 792–795, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soo C-S, Bernardino ME, Chuang VP, Ordonez N: Pitfalls of CT findings in post- therapy testicular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5: 39–41, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernardino ME: Percutaneous biopsy. Am J Radiol 142: 41–45, 1984.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernardino ME, Green B: Ultrasonographic evaluation of chemotherapeutic response in hepatic metastases. Radiology 133: 437–441, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernardino ME, Small W, Goldstein J, Sewell CW, Sones PJ, Gedgaudas-McClees K, Galambos JT, Wenger J, Casareila WJ: Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue. Am J Radiol 141: 1203–1208, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Bernardino

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations