Skip to main content

The Role of Post-Endotoxin Serum Components from BCG Infected Mice in the Protection of Compromised Hosts

  • Chapter
Immunobiology and Immunopharmacology of Bacterial Endotoxins

Abstract

The beneficial effects of bacterial toxins have been demonstrated in various experimental models in which the host was compromised by a great variety of different noxae. The induction of nonspecific tolerance by endotoxins to the toxic effects of endotoxins (5) and of nonspecific resistance to infection (9,18) and to lethal X-irradiation (24,36) was of particular interest in our studies. In recent years it has become more apparent that these effects are mediated by humoral factors which are produced and released from lymphoreticular cells after injection of endotoxin. Freedman (13) reported that endotoxin tolerance was passively transferable with serum from tolerant mice. Using a detoxified endotoxin preparation that induced tolerance to the lethal effects of endotoxin after one single pretreatment (42), we were unable to observe this passive transfer effect. The transfer of enhanced resistance to bacterial infection was achieved with post-endotoxin serum from BCG (Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette Guerin) infected mice (30). Moreover, it was reported that such serum (BCG/ET serum) or postendotoxin serum from zymosan treated mice induced protection against the lethal effects of whole-body X-irradiation (1,48).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. D. Addison and L. J. Berry, Passive protection against X-irradiation with serum from zymosan-primed and endotoxin injected mice, J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 30: 301 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. J. Ainsworth and H. B. Chase, Effect of microbial antigens on irradiation mortality in mice, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 102: 483 (1959).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. N. Apte and D. H. Pluznik, Genetic control of lipopolysaccharide induced generation of serum colony stimulating factor and proliferation of splenic granulocyte/macrophage precursor cells, J. Cell Physiol. 89: 313 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. B. Beeson, Tolerance to bacterial pyrogens. II. Role of the reticuloendothelial system, J. Exp. Med. 86: 39 (1947).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Benacerraf, M. M. Sebestyen, and S. Schlossman, A quantitative study of the kinetics of blood clearance of P32 labelled Escherichia coli and staphylococci by the reticuloendothelial system, J. Exp. Med. 110: 27 (1959).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Biozzi, C. Stiffel, B. N. Halpern, and D. Mouton, Recherches sur le mechanisme de l’immunité non spécifique produite par les mycobac- tèries, Rev. Franc Etudes Clin. Biol. 5:876 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. R. Bradley and D. Metcalf, The growth of mouse bone marrow cells in vitro, J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 44: 287 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. Butler, A. M. Abdelnoor, and A. Nowotny, Bone marrow colony-stimu-lating factor and tumor resistance-enhancing activity of postendo- toxin mouse sera, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75: 2893 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. Dubos and R. W. Schaedler, Reversible changes in the susceptibility of mice to bacterial infections, J. Exp. Med. 104: 53 (1956).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. J. Carswell, L. J. Old, R. L. Kassel, S. Green, N. Fiore, and B. Williamson, An endotoxin-induced serum factor that causes necrosis of tumors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72: 3666 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Chedid, M. Parant, C. Damais, F. Parant, D. Juy, and A. Galleli, Failure of endotoxin to increase nonspecific resistance to infection of lipopolysaccharide low-responder mice, Infect. Immun. 13: 722 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Ditter, K. P. Becker, R. Urbaschek, and B. Urbaschek, Quantitativer Endotoxin-nachweis. Automatisierter, kinetischer limulus-amobozyten- lysat-mikrotiter-test mit Messung probenabhangiger Interferenzen, Arzneim. Forsch. 33: 681 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. H. Freedman, Passive transfer of protection against lethality of homologous and heterologous endotoxins, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 102: 504 (1959).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. E. Greisman, F. A. Carozza, and J. D. Hills, Mechanisms of endotoxin tolerance. I. Relationship between tolerance and reticuloendothelial system phagocytic activity in the rabbit, Exp. Med. 117: 663 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. E. Greisman, Induction of endotoxin tolerance, in: “Beneficial Effects of Endotoxins,” A. Nowotny, ed., Plenum Press, New York and London (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. C. Kull and P. Cuatrecasas, Preliminary characterization of the tumor cell cytotoxin in tumor necrosis serum, Immunol. 126: 1279 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Kurland and M.A.S. Moore, Modulation of hemopoiesis by prostaglandins, Exp. Hematol. 5: 357 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Landy and L. Pillemer, Increased resistance to infection and accompanying alteration in properdin levels following administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharides, J. Exp. Med. 104: 383 (1956).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. N. Mannel, D. L. Rosenstreich, and S. E. Mergenhagen, Mechanism of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis: requirement for lipopoly- saccharide-sensitive lymphoreticular cells, Infect. Imm. 24: 5 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. N. Mannel, R. N. Moore, and S. E. Mergenhagen, Macrophages as a source of tumoricidal activity (tumor necrosis factor), Infect. Immun. 30: 523 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R.S. McCuskey, R. Urbaschek, P. A. McCuskey, and B. Urbaschek, In vivo microscopic studies of the responses of the liver to endotoxin, Klin. Wochenschr. 60:56 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. S. McCuskey, R. Urbaschek, P. A. McCuskey, and B. Urbaschek, In vivo microscopic observations of the responses of Kupffer cells and the hepatic microcirculation to Mycobacterium bovis BCG alone and in combination with endotoxin, Infect. Immun. 42:362 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. T. A. McNeill and I. Gresser, Inhibition of haematopoietic colony growth by interferon preparations from different sources, Nature (London) 244: 173 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. B. Mefferd, D. T. Henkel, and J. B. Loeffer, Effect of piromen on survival of irradiated mice, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 83: 54 (1953).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. R. N. Moore, Regulation of macrophage accessory functions by interaction involving lymphokines and endotoxin, Klin. Wochenschr. 60: 754 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R. N. Moore and B. T. Rouse, Enhanced responsiveness of committed macrophage precursors to macrophage-type colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) induced in vitro by interferons alpha and beta, J. Immunol. 131: 2374 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. C. Moreau and R. C. Skarnes, Host resistance to bacterial endo-toxemia: mechanisms in endotoxin-tolerant animals, J. Infect. Dis. 128 (Suppl.): 122 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Nowotny, U. H. Behling, and H. L. Chang, Relation of structure to function in bacterial endotoxins. VIII. Biological activities in a polysaccharide-rich fraction, JT. Immunol. 115: 199 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Metcalf, Acute antigen-induced elevation of serum colony-stimulating factor (CSF) levels, Immunol. 21: 427 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. A. Parant, F. J. Parant, and L. A. Chedid, Enhancement of resistance to infections by endotoxin-induced serum factor from Mycobacterium bovis BCG-infected mice, Infect. Immun. 28: 654 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. D. L. Peavy, R. E. Baughn, and D. M. Muscher, Effects of BCG infection on the susceptibility of mouse macrophages to endotoxin, Infect. Immun. 24: 59 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. H. Pluznik and L. Sachs, The cloning of normal “mast” cells in tissue culture, J. Cell Physiol. 66: 319 (1965).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Quesenberry, J. Halperin, M. Ryan, and F. Stohlman, Jr., Tolerance to the granulocyte-releasing and colony-stimulating factor elevating effects of endotoxin, Blood 6: 789 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Rothman, A. G. Johnson, H. Friedman, E. Kovats, P. H. Pham, F. Sanavi, A. M. Nowotny, and A. Nowotny, Biological effects of White- type polysaccharides of gram-negative bacteria, J. Biol. Resp. Modif. 4: 169 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. G. Shah, S. Green, and M.A.S. Moore, Colony-stimulating factor and inhibiting activities in mouse serum after Corynebacterium parvum- endotoxin treatment, J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 23: 29 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. W. W. Smith, I. M. Alderman, and R. F. Gillespie, Increased survival in irradiated animals treated with bacterial endotoxin, Am. J. Physiol. 191: 124 (1957).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. W. W. Smith, I. M. Alderman, C. Schneider, and J. Cornfield, Sensitivity of irradiated mice to bacterial endotoxin, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 113: 778 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. W. W. Smith, G. Brecher, S. Fred, and R. A. Budd, Effect of endotoxin on the kinetics of hemopoietic colony-forming cells in irradiated mice, Radiat. Res. 27: 710 (1966).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. B. M. Sultzer, Genetic control of leucocyte responses to endotoxin, Nature (London) 219: 1253 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. Suter, G. E. Ullman, and R. G. Hoffman, Sensitivity of mice to endotoxin after vaccination with BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin), Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 99: 167 (1958).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. R. A, Trejo and N. R. DiLuzio, Influence of endotoxin tolerance on detoxification of Salmonella enteritidis endotoxin by mouse liver and spleen, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 141: 501 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Urbaschek and A. Nowotny, Endotoxin tolerance induced by detoxified endotoxin (endotoxoid), Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 127: 650 (1968).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. R. Urbaschek, S. E. Mergenhagen, and B. Urbaschek, Failure of endotoxin to protect C3H/HeJ mice against lethal X-irradiation, Infect. Immun. 18: 860 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. R. Urbaschek, Effects of bacterial products on granulopoiesis, in: “Macrophages and Lymphocytes: Nature, Functions and Interaction,” M. R. Escobar and H. Friedman, eds., Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. Urbaschek, R. K. Shadduck, C. Bona, and S. E. Mergenhagen, Colony-stimulating factor in nonspecific resistance and in increased suscep- tibililty to endotoxin, in: “Microbiology 1980, ” D. Schlessinger, ed., American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Urbaschek and B. Urbaschek, The effects of endotoxic substances on granulopoiesis, in: “Natural Toxins,” D. Eaker and T. Wadstrom, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Urbaschek and B. Urbaschek, Aspects of beneficial endotoxin-mediated effects, Klin. Wochensehr. 60: 746 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Urbaschek and B. Urbaschek, Ability of post-endotoxin serum from BCG-infected mice to induce nonspecific resistance and stimulation of granulopoiesis, Infect. Immun. 39: 1488 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. B. Urbaschek, B. Ditter, K. P. Becker, and R. Urbaschek, Protective effects and role of endotoxin in experimental septicemia, Circ. Shock 14: 209 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Urbaschek and B. Urbaschek, Induction of nonspecific resistance and stimulation of granulopoiesis by endotoxins and nontoxic bacterial cell wall components and its passive transfer, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci, (in press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  51. B. Urbaschek, K. P. Becker, B. Ditter, and R. Urbaschek, Quantitation of endotoxin and sample-related interference by using a kinetic limulus amebocyte lysate microtiter test, in: “Microbiology 1985, ” L. Leive, ed., American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. Urbaschek, D. N. Mannel, G. H. Northoff, and H. Kirchner, Release of macrophage mediators in response to endotoxin in hyperreactive and tolerant BCG infected mice, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. N. Vogel and D. L. Rosenstreich, LPS-unresponsive mice as a model for analyzing lymphokine-induced macrophage differentiation in vitro, Lymphokines 3: 149 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. R. I. Walker, Hematologic contributions to increases in resistance or sensitivity to endotoxin, in: “Experimental Hematology Today 1979,” S. J. Baum and G. D. Ledney, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  55. D. A. Wichteran, A. E. Baue, and I. H. Chaudry, Sepsis and septic shock-a review of laboratory models and a proposal, J. Surg. Res. 29: 189 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. J. S. Younger and W. Stineberg, Interferon appearance stimulated by endotoxin, bacteria or viruses in mice pretreated with Escherichia coli endotoxin or infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Nature (London) 208: 456 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urbaschek, R., Männel, D.N., Mergenhagen, S.E., Urbaschek, B. (1986). The Role of Post-Endotoxin Serum Components from BCG Infected Mice in the Protection of Compromised Hosts. In: Szentivanyi, A., Friedman, H., Nowotny, A. (eds) Immunobiology and Immunopharmacology of Bacterial Endotoxins. University of South Florida International Biomedical Symposia Series, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2253-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2253-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9319-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2253-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics