Advertisement

The Evolution of Salamander Courtship Pheromones

  • Lynne D. Houck

Abstract

Among vertebrates, the importance of chemical signals and chemosensory perception is unquestioned, especially for mammals (Birch, 1974b; Doty, 1976; Muller-Schwarze and Mozell, 1977). Chemosensory perception also is well documented for many reptiles (Burghardt, 1970), fish (Bardach and Todd, 1970; Liley, 1982; Pfeiffer, 1974; Stacey, 1983), and even some birds (Grubb, 1974; Stager, 1967; Walcott and Lednor, 1983). It is less widely appreciated that the perception and production of chemical information represents a critical mode of communication for amphibians (Madison, 1977), salamanders in particular. Salamanders produce chemical secretions from a glandular skin, from specialized glands located on the head, or from discrete glands within the cloaca (Brodie, 1968; Noble, 1931; Sever, 1976). For many salamanders, skin secretions include noxious poisons that are effective at repelling potential predators (Labanick and Brandon, 1981; Madison, 1977). Within species, salamanders use chemical perception as one of several significant cues when migrating long distances to breeding sites (Dolmen, 1982; Grant et al., 1968; Kleeberger and Werner, 1982; Twitty, 1959, 1961) or when returning to “home” areas from which they have been displaced (Holomuzki, 1982; Madison 1969, 1972; Madison and Shoop, 1970). Forester (1977, 1979) has shown that females of at least one plethodontid species (Desmognathus ochrophaeus) returned from months of foraging in the forest litter to the precise streamside site where they had oviposited in a previous year.

Keywords

Sexual Selection Mating Success Sperm Competition Courtship Behavior Male Mating Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. D., 1961, The courtship behavior of Ambystoma macrodactylum croceum, Copeia, 1961: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angle, J. P., 1969, The reproductive cycle of the northern ravine salaman- der, Plethodon richmondi richmondi, in the Valley and Ridge Province of Pennsylvania and Maryland, J. Wash. Acad. Sci, 59: 192.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, S. J., 1972, The evolution of courtship behavior in salamanders. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, S. J., 1976, Sexual behavior, sexual interference and sexual defense in the salamanders Ambystoma maculatum, Ambystoma tigrinum and Plethodon jordani. Z. Tierpsychol, 42: 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold, S. J., 1977, The evolution of courtship behavior in New World salamanders with some comments on old World salamandrids, in: The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians,11 D. H. Taylor, and S. I. Guttman, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, S. J., and Houck, L. D., 1982, Courtship pheromones: Evolution by natural and sexual selection, in: “Biochemical Aspects of Evolutionary Biology,” M. H. Nitecki, ed., Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, S. J., and Wade, M. J., 1984a, On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory, Evolution, 38: 709.Google Scholar
  8. Arnold, S. J., and Wade, M. J., 1984b, On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications, Evolution, 38: 720.Google Scholar
  9. Bardach, J. E., and Todd, J. H., 1970, Chemical communication in fish, in: “Communication by Chemical Signals,” J. W. Johnston, Jr., D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk, eds., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Batemen, A. J., 1948, Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila, Heredity, 2: 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, G., 1977, The life of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) after metamorphosis, Ecol. Monogr, 47: 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belvedere, P. C., Colombo, L., Mezzalira, F., and Malacarne, G., 1984, Steroid biosynthesis by the abdominal gland and the testis of the crested newt, Triturus cristatus carnifex Laur., Boll. Zool, 51, Suppl. 9.Google Scholar
  13. Birch, M. D., 1974a, Aphrodisiac pheromones in insects, in: “Pheromones,” M. D. Birch, ed., North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Birch, M. D., ed., 1974b, “Pheromones,” North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Blair, W. F., ed., 1961, “Vertebrate Speciation,” Univ. Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  16. Boisseau, C., and Joly, J., 1975, Transport and survival of spermatozoa in female Amphibia, in: “The Biology of Spermatozoa,” E. S. E. Hafez, and C. G. Thibault, eds., S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  17. Brandon, R. A., 1970, Courtship, spermatophores and eggs of the Mexican Achoque, Ambystoma (Bathysiredon) dumerili (Duges), Zool. J. Linn. Soc, 49: 247.Google Scholar
  18. Brodie, E. D., Jr., 1968, Observations on the mental hedonic gland- clusters of western salamanders of the genus Plethodon, Herpetol- ogica, 24: 248.Google Scholar
  19. Burghardt, G. M., 1970, Chemical perception in reptiles, in: “Communication by Chemical Signals,” J. W. Johnston, Jr., D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk, eds., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Butler, C. G., 1970, Chemical communication in insects: Behavioral and ecologic aspects, in: Communication by Chemical Signals, J. W. Johnston, Jr., D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk, eds., Appleton-Century- Crof ts, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Cedrini, L., and Fasolo, A., 1971, Olfactory attractants in sex recognition of the crested newt. An electrophysiological research, Monit. Zool. Ital. (N.S.), 5: 223.Google Scholar
  22. Crow, J. F., 1958, Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man, Human Biol., 30: 1.Google Scholar
  23. Darwin, C., 1859, “The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life,” John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  24. Darwin, C., 1871, “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, W. C., and Twitty, V. C., 1964, Courtship behavior and reproductive isolation in the species of Taricha (Amphibia, Caudata ), Copeia, 1964: 601.Google Scholar
  26. Dawley, E. M., 1984a, Recognition of individual, sex and species odours by salamanders of the Plethodon glutinosus - _P. jordani complex, Anim. Behav., 32: 353.Google Scholar
  27. Dawley, E. M., 1984b, Identification of sex through odors by male red- spotted newts, Notophthalmus viridescens, Herpetologica, 40: 101.Google Scholar
  28. Dewsbury, D. A., 1981, Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena, Psych. Bull., 89: 464.Google Scholar
  29. Dodd, C. K., Jr., Johnson, J. A. and Brodie, E. D., Jr., 1974, Noxious skin secretions of an eastern small Plethodon,.P. nettingi hubrichti, J. Herpetol., 8: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doty, R. L., ed., 1976, “Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes, and Behavior,” Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Dunn, E. R., 1926, “The Salamanders of the Family Plethodontidae,” Smith College, Mass.Google Scholar
  32. Eigenmann, C. H., and Myers, G. S., 1929, The American Characidae, Part V, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, XLII: 429.Google Scholar
  33. Farr, J. A., 1980, The effects of sexual experience and female receptivity on courtship-rape decisions in male guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae ), Anim. Behav., 28: 1195.Google Scholar
  34. Forester, D. C., 1977, Comments on the female reproductive cycle and philopatry by Desmognathus ochrophaeus (Amphibia, Urodela, Plethodontidae), J. Herpetol., 11: 311.Google Scholar
  35. Forester, D. C., 1979, Homing to the nest by female mountain dusky salamanders ( Desmognathus ochrophaeus) with comments on the sensory modalities essential to clutch recognition, Herpetologica, 35: 330.Google Scholar
  36. Gasco, F., 1881, Les amours des axolotls, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 6: 151.Google Scholar
  37. Giacoma, C., Malacarne, G., Andreoletti, G. C., and Vellano, C., 1979, The significance of the abdominal gland in the reproductive behavior of the crested newt: a preliminary study, Mon. Zool. Ital. ( N.S. ), 13: 204.Google Scholar
  38. Gill, D. E., 1985, Interpreting breeding patterns from census data: a solution to the Husting dilemma, Ecology, 66: 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant, D., Anderson, 0. and Twitty, V., 1968, Homing orientation by olfaction in newts ( Taricha rivularis ), Science, 160: 1354.Google Scholar
  40. Grubb, T. C., 1974, Olfactory navigation to the nesting burrow in Leach’s Petrel ( Oceanodroma leucorrhoa ), Anim. Behav. 22: 192.Google Scholar
  41. Gwynne, D. T., 1984, Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition, in: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Hairston, N. G., 1980, Species packing in the salamander genus Desmognathus: What are the interspecific interactions involved?, Am. Nat., 115: 354.Google Scholar
  43. Hairston, N. G., 1983, Alpha selection in competing salamanders: Experimental verification of an a priori hypothesis, Am. Nat., 122: 105.Google Scholar
  44. Halliday, T. R., 1974, Sexual behaviour of the smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris ( Urodela, Salamandridae), _J. Herpetol., 8: 277.Google Scholar
  45. Halliday, T. R., 1975, An observational and experimental study of sexual behaviour in the smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris (Amphibia: Salamandridae ), Anim. Behav., 23: 291.Google Scholar
  46. Halliday, T. R., 1977, The effects of experimental manipulationGoogle Scholar
  47. breathing behaviour on the sexual behaviour of the smooth newt, Triturus vulgaris, Anim. Behav., 25: 39.Google Scholar
  48. Halliday, T. R., and Sweatman, H. P. A., 1976, To breathe or not to breathe: The newt’s problem, Anim. Behav., 24: 551.Google Scholar
  49. Halliday, T. R., and Verrell, P. A., 1984, Sperm competition in amphibians, in: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed., Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  50. Hanken, J., 1984, Miniaturization and its effect on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thorius (Amphibia, Plethodontidae). I. Osteological variation, Biol. Jour. Linn. Soc., 23: 55.Google Scholar
  51. Himstedt, W., 1979, The significance of colour signals in partner recognition of the newt Triturus alpestris, Copeia, 1979: 40.Google Scholar
  52. Holomuzki, J. R., 1982, Homing behavior of Desmognathus ochrophaeus along a stream, J. Herpetol., 16: 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Houck, L. D., 1977, Life history patterns and reproductive biology of neotropical salamanders, in: The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians, D. H. Taylor, and S. I. Guttman, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Houck, L. D., 1980, Courtship behavior in the plethodontid salamander, Desmognathus wrighti, Amer. Zool., 20: 825.Google Scholar
  55. Houck, L. D., 1982, Male tail loss and courtship success in the plethodontid salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus, J. Herpetol., 16: 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Houck, L. D., Arnold, S. J., and Thisted, R., 1985a, A statistical analysis of sexual selection in the plethodontid salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus, Evolution, 39: 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Houck, L. D., and Schwenk, K., 1984, The potential for long-term sperm competition in a plethodontid salamander, Herpetologica, 40: 410.Google Scholar
  58. Houck, L. D., Tilley, S. G., and Arnold, S. J., 1985b, Sperm competition in a plethodontid salamander: Preliminary results, J. Herpetol., 19: 420.Google Scholar
  59. Jaeger, R. G., and Gergits, W. F., 1979, Intra- and interspecific communication in salamanders through chemical signals on the substrate, Anim. Behav., 27: 150.Google Scholar
  60. Jaeger, R. G., and Gergits, W. F., 1979, Intra- and interspecific communication in salamanders through chemical signals on the substrate, Anim. Behav., 27: 150.Google Scholar
  61. Jaeger, R. G., Kalvarsky, D., and Shimizu, N., 1982, Territorial behavior of the red-backed salamander: Expulsion of intruders, Anim. Behav., 30: 490.Google Scholar
  62. Johnston, R. E., 1982, Mechanisms of individual discrimination in hamsters, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates III,”, D. Muller-Schwarze and R. M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Joly, J., 1966, Sur l’ethologie sexuelle de Salamandra salamandra L., Z. Tierpsychol., 23: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Keen, W. H., 1982, Habitat selection and interspecific competition in two species of plethodontid salamanders, Ecology, 63: 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Keen, W. H. * and Sharp, S., 1984, Responses of a plethodontid salamander to heterospecific and conspecific intruders, Anim. Behav., 32: 58.Google Scholar
  66. Kirkpatrick, M., 1982, Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice, Evolution, 36: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kleeberger, S. R., and Werner, J. K., 1982, Home range and homing behavior Plethodon cinereus in Northern Michigan, Copeia, 1982: 409.Google Scholar
  68. Krebs, J. R., and Dawkins, R., 1984, Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation, in: “Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach,” Second Ed., J. R. Krebs, and N. B. Davies, eds., Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  69. Kumpf, D. F., 1934, The courtship of Ambystoma tigrinum, Copeia, 1934: 7.Google Scholar
  70. Labanick, G. M., 1983, Inheritance of the red-leg and red-cheek traits in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus, Herpetologica, 30: 114.Google Scholar
  71. Labanick, G. M., and Brandon, R. A., 1981, An experimental study of Batesian mimicry between the salamanders Plethodon jordani and Desmognathus ochrophaeus, J. Herpetol., 15: 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lande, R., 1980, Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters, Evolution, 34: 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lande, R., 1981, Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78: 3721.Google Scholar
  74. Lande, R., 1982, A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution, Ecology, 62: 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lanza, B., 1949, II corpo ghiandolare mento niero dei Plethodontidae (Amphibia, Caudata ), Monitore Zool. Ital., 67: 15.Google Scholar
  76. Licht, L. E., 1969, Observations on the courtship behavior of Ambystoma gracile, Herpetologica, 25: 49.Google Scholar
  77. Liley, N. R., 1982, Chemical communication in fish, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 39: 22.Google Scholar
  78. Losey, G. S., 1969, Sexual pheromone in some fishes of the genus Hypsoblennius, Gill., Science, 163: 181.Google Scholar
  79. Madison, D. M., 1969, Homing behaviour of the red-cheeked salamander, Plethodon jordani, Anim. Behav., 17: 25.Google Scholar
  80. Madison, D. M., 1972, A mechanism of homing orientation in salamanders involving chemical cues, in: “NASA Spec. Publ. 262,” S. R. Galler, K. Schmidt-Koenig, G. L. Jacobs, and R. B. Bellville, eds., NASA.Google Scholar
  81. Madison, D. M., 1975, Intraspecific odor preferences between salamanders of the same sex: Dependence on season and proximity of residence, Can. J. Zool., 53: 1356.Google Scholar
  82. Madison, D. M., 1977, Chemical communication in amphibians and reptiles, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates,” D. Muller-Schwarze, and M. M. Mozell, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Madison, D. M. and Shoop, C. R., 1970, Homing behavior, orientation, and home range of salamanders tagged with Tantalum-182, Science, 168: 1484.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Malacarne, G., Bottoni, L., Massa, R., and Vellano, C., 1984. The abdominal gland of the crested newt: a possible source of courtship pheromones. Preliminary ethological and biochemical data, Monlt. Zool. Ital., ( N.S. ), 18: 33.Google Scholar
  85. Malacarne, G., and Curtassa, R., 1983, Sexual selection in the crested newt, Anim. Behav., 31: 1256.Google Scholar
  86. Marchlewska-Koj, A., 1982, Priming pheromones in mice, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates III,” D. Muller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silver- stein, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  87. Margolis, S. E., 1980, Ethological criteria of chemical sensitivity of the aquatic forms of newts, Zoolog. Zhurnal., 59: 1683.Google Scholar
  88. Moore, R. E., 1965, Olfactory discrimination as an isolation mechanism between Peromyscus maniculatus and Peromyscus polionotus, Amer. Midi. Natur., 73: 85.Google Scholar
  89. Muller-Schwarze, D., 1974, Olfactory recognition of species, groups, individuals and physiological states among mammals, in: “Pheromones,” M. D. Birch, ed., North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  90. Muller-Schwarze, D., 1977, Complex mammalian behavior and pheromone bioassay in the field, jui “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates,” D. Muller-Schwarze, and M. M. Mozell, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Nelson, K., 1964, Behavior and morphology in the Glandulocaudine fishes (Ostariophysi, Characidae ), Univ. Calif Publ. Zool., 75: 59.Google Scholar
  92. Noble, G. K., 1927, The plethodontid salamanders; some aspects of their evolution, Am. Mus. Novit., 249: 1.Google Scholar
  93. Noble, G. K., 1929, The relations of courtship to secondary sex characters of the two-line salamander, Eurycea bislineata ( Green ), Am. Mus. Novit., 362: 1.Google Scholar
  94. Noble, G. K., 1931, “The Biology of the Amphibia,” Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Noble, G. K., and Brady, M. K., 1931, The courtship of plethodontid salamanders, Copeia, 1930: 52.Google Scholar
  96. Noble, G. K., and Brady, M. K., 1933, Observations on the life history of the marbled salamander, Ambystoma opacum Grabenhorst, Zoologica, N.Y., 11: 89.Google Scholar
  97. O’Connell, R. J., 1977, From insect to mammal: Complications of the bioassay, in: “Chemical Signals in Vertebrates,” D. Muller-Schwarze, and M. Mozell, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Organ, J. A., 1961, Studies on the local distribution, life history, and population dynamics of the salamander genus Desmognathus in Virginia, Ecol. Monogr, 31: 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Papenfuss, T. J., Wake, D. B., and Adler, K., 1983, Salamanders of the genus Bolitoglossa from the Sierra Madre del Sur of Southern Mexico, J. Herpetol, 17: 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Parker, G. A., 1970, Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects, Biol. Rev, 45: 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Payne, A. P., 1978, Attractant properties of the Harderian gland and its products on male golden hamsters of differing sexual experience, Proc. Soc. Endocr, 8-30/9-2.Google Scholar
  102. Peacock, R. L., and Nussbaum, R. A., 1973, Reproductive biology and population structure of the western red-backed salamander, Plethodon vehiculum (Cooper), J. Herpetol, 7: 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Payne, T., Cardé, R., and Boech, J., eds., 1985. “Mechanisms of Perception and Orientation to Insect Olfactory Signals,” Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford,Google Scholar
  104. Perrigo, G., and Bronson, F. H., 1983, Communication disparities between genetically-diverging populations of deermice, in: Chemical Signals invertebrates III, D. Muller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein, eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  105. Pfeiffer, W., 1974, Pheromones in fish and amphibia, in: Pheromones, D. Birch, ed., North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  106. Pool, T. B., and Dent, J. N., 1977, The ultrastructure and the hormonal control of product synthesis in the hedonic glands of the red- spotted newt Notophthalmus viridescens, J. Exp. Zool, 201: 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rogoff, J. L., 1927, The hedonic glands of Triturus viridescens: a structural and morphological study, Anat. Rec., 34: 132.Google Scholar
  108. Roth, G., 1976, Experimental analysis of prey catching behavior of Hydromantes italicus Dunn (Amphibia, Plethodontidae ), J. Comp. Physiol., 109: 47.Google Scholar
  109. Salthe, S. N., 1967, Courtship patterns and phylogeny of the urodeles, Copeia, 1967: 100.Google Scholar
  110. Sever, D. M., 1975, Morphological and seasonal variation of the mental hedonic glands of the dwarf salamander, Eurycea quadridigitata ( Holbrook ), Herpetologica, 31: 241.Google Scholar
  111. Sever, D. M., 1976, Morphology of the mental hedonic gland clusters of plethodontid salamanders (Amphibia, Urodela, Plethodontidae), J. Herpetol., 10: 227.Google Scholar
  112. Signoret, J. P., 1976, Chemical communication and reproduction in domestic mammals, in: Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes, and Behavior,11 R. L. Doty, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  113. Signoret, J. P., and du Mesnil du Buisson, F., 1961, Etude de comporte- ment de la Truie en oestrus, in: 4th Congres Inter, de Reprod. Animale et Insemination Artificielle.11Google Scholar
  114. Simon, G. S., and Madison, D. M., 1984, Individual recognition in salamanders: Cloacal odours, Anim. Behav., 32: 1017.Google Scholar
  115. Smith, A. B., Ill, Belcher, A. M., Epple, G., Jurs, P., and Lavine, B., 1985, Computerized pattern recognition: A new technique for the analysis of chemical communication, Science, 228: 175.Google Scholar
  116. Spotila, J. R., and Beumer, R. J., 1970, The breeding habits of the ringed salamander, Ambystoma annulatum (Cope), in northeastern Arkansas, Amer. Midi. Nat, 84: 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Stacey, N., 1983, Hormones and pheromones in fish sexual behavior, Bioscience, 9: 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Steger, K. E., 1967, Avian olfaction, Amer. Zool, 7: 415.Google Scholar
  119. Stebbins, R. C., 1954, Natural history of the salamanders of the plethodontid genus Ensatina, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool, 54: 47.Google Scholar
  120. Storez, R. A., 1969, Observations on the courtship of Ambystoma laterale, J. Herpetol., 3: 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Storez, R. A., 1969, Observations on the courtship of Ambystoma laterale, J. Herpetol., 3: 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thornhill, R., 1981, Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: Systems for understanding resource-defense polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst, 12: 355.Google Scholar
  123. Tilley, S. G., and Hausman, J. S., 1976, Allozymic variation and occurrence of multiple inseminations in populations of the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus, Copeia, 1976: 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tristram, D. A., 1977, Intraspecific olfactory communication in the terrestrial salamander Plethodon cinereus, Copeia, 1977: 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Twitty, V. C., 1959, Migration and speciation in newts, Science, 130: 1735.Google Scholar
  126. Twitty, V. C., 1961, Experiments on homing behavior and speciation in Taricha, in: Vertebrate Speciation, W. F. Blair, ed., Univ. Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  127. Uzzell, T., 1964, Relations of the diploid and triploid species of the Ambystoma jeffersonianum complex (Amphibia, Caudata ), Copeia, 1964: 257.Google Scholar
  128. Uzzell, T., 1969, Notes on spermatophore production by salamanders of Ambys toma jeff ersonianum complex, Copeia, 1969: 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Verrell, P., 1982a, The sexual behaviour of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Amphibia: Urodela: Salamandridae ), Anim. Behav., 30: 1224.Google Scholar
  130. Verrell, P., 1982b, Newts can be colorful too, Bioscience, 32: 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wake, D. B., 1966, Comparative osteology and evolution of the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. Mem. S. Calif. Acad. Sci, 4: 1.Google Scholar
  132. Walcott, C. and Lednor, A. J., 1983, Bird navigation, in: Perspectives in Ornithology,11 A. H. Brush, and G. A. Clark, Jr., eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  133. Whitten, W. K., and Bronson, F. H. s., 1970, The role of pheromones in mammalian reproduction, in: “Communication by Chemical Signals,” J. W. Johnston, Jr., D. G. Moulton, and A. Turk, eds., Appleton- Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  134. Williams, S., 1972, Reproduction and ecology of the Jemez Mountains salamander, Plethodon neomexicanus, M. S. Thesis, Univ. New Mexico.Google Scholar
  135. Wilson, E. 0., and Bossert, W. H., 1963, Chemical communication among animals, Rec. Prog. Horm. Res, 19: 673.Google Scholar
  136. Wrobel, D. J., Gergits, W. F., and Jaeger, R. G., 1980, An experimental study of interference competition among terrestrial salamanders. Ecology, 61: 1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne D. Houck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations