A Comparison of Three Types of Pulse Tube Refrigerators: New Methods for Reaching 60K

Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 31)


Pulse tube or thermoacoustic refrigerators require only one moving part—an oscillating piston or diaphragm at room temperature. Refrigeration occurs within a tube connected to the pressure wave generator when the thermal relaxation time between gas and tube is comparable to a half period. Three types have been discussed in the literature recently by Gifford, by Mikulin, and by Wheatley. A record low temperature of 60 K was achieved in our work using a single stage pulse tube similar to that of Mikulin. Previously 105 K was the lowest temperature achieved. Because of only one moving part, all three types have the potential for long life, but their efficiency and intrinsic limitations have never been investigated. This paper compares the three types with each other and with common refrigerators such as Joule-Thomson and Stirling refrigerators. An apparatus is described which can measure the intrinsic behavior of the different types from temperatures of about 30 K to 300 K. Overall cycle efficiency as well as sources of loss such as conduction and regenerator ineffectiveness are discussed and the advantages of various phase shifting techniques to increase refrigeration capacity are compared.


Pressure Ratio Pulse Tube Reservoir Volume Thermal Relaxation Time Enthalpy Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. E. Gifford and R. C. Longsworth, Pulse-tube refrigeration, ASME paper No. 63-WA-290 presented at Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Nov. 17–22, 1963 )Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. E. Gifford and R. C. Longsworth, Pulse tube refrigeration progress, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 10B, Plenum Press, New York (1965), p. 69.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. E. Gifford and R. C. Longsworth, Surface heat pumping, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 11, Plenum Press, New York (1966), p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. C. Longsworth, An experimental investigation of pulse tube refrigeration heat pumping rates, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 12, Plenum Press, New York (1967), p. 608.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. E. Gifford and G. H. Kyanka, Reversible pulse tube refrigeration, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 12, Plenum Press, New York (1967), p. 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. A. Lechner and R. A. Ackermann, Concentric pulse tube analysis and design, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 18, Plenum Press, New York (1973), p. 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Merkli and H. Thomann, Thermoacoustic effects in a resonance tube, J. Fluid Mech. 70: 161 (1975).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Wheatley, T. Hofler, G. W. Swift, and A. Migliori, Understanding some simple phenomena in thermoacoustics with applications to acoustical heat engines, Am. J. Phys. 53: 147 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Wheatley and A. Cox, Natural engines, Phys. Today 38 no. 8: 50 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Wheatley, T. Hofler, G. W. Swift, and A. Migliori, An intrinsically irreversible thermoacoustic heat engine, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74: 153 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. I. Mikulin, A. A. Tarasov, and M. P. Shkrebyonock, Low-temperature expansion pulse tubes, “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 29, Plenum Press, New York, (1984), p. 629.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. C. Longsworth, Air Products and Chemicals, Allentown, PA, private communication, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Bureau of StandardsBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations