Advertisement

The Electromagnetic Environment and the Circadian Rhythms of Human Subjects

  • Rütger A. Wever
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (PRIP)

Abstract

In the course of investigations concerning the human circadian system, a remarkable sensitivity of this system to weak ELF fields had been found as a side-result. Originally, the relevant experiments had been performed only in order to evaluate dynamic properties of human circadian rhythms; and the ELF field had been applied only as an appropriate tool. It was subsequent, after the originally asked questions had been answered, that, in return, the properties of the tool became of increasing interest.

Keywords

Circadian Rhythm Rectal Temperature Circadian System Standard Field Temperature Rhythm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff, J., and Wever, R., 1962, Spontanperiodik des Menschen bei Ausschluss aller Zeitgeber, Naturwissenschaften, 49: 337–342.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J., Gerecke, U., and Wever, R., 1967, Desynchronization of human circadian rhythms, Jap. J. Physiol., 17:450–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aschoff, J., V. Saint Paul, U., and Wever, R., 1968, Circadiane Periodik von Finkenvögeln unter dem Einfluss eines selbstgewählten Licht-Dunkel-Wechsels, Z. vergi. Physiol., 58: 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aschoff, J., Gerecke, U., Kureck, A., Pohl, H., Rieger, P., v. Saint Paul, U., and Wever, R., 1971, Interdependent parameters of circadian activity rhythms in birds and man, in: “Biochronometry”, M. Menaker, ed., Nat. Acad. Sciences, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Cremer-Bartels, G., Krause, K., and Köchle, H. J., 1983, Influence of low magnetic field strength variations on the retina and pineal gland of quails and humans, Graefe’s Arch. Klin. Exper. Ophtal., 220:248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delgado, J. M. R., Leal, J., Monteagudo, J. L., and Gracia, M. G., 1982, Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, J. Anat., 134:533–551.Google Scholar
  7. Ehret, P. F., and Duffy, C. H., 1983, High-strength 60-Hz fields are circadian Zeitgebers in mice, Chronobiologia, 10: 124.Google Scholar
  8. Gmelin, L., 1963, Sauerstoff, Handbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (8. Aufl.), Bd. 3 /5: 1704–1725.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobi, E., and Krökemper, G., 1975, Wirkungen simulierter sferics (wetterbedingte, elektromagnetische Strahlungen) auf die Thrombozytenadhäsivität, Inn. Med., 2:73–81.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobi, E., 1977, “Habilitationsschrift”, Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  11. Jacobi, E., 1979, “Pathophysiologic der Thrombozytenadhäsivität”, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.Google Scholar
  12. Rohracher, H., and Inanaga, K., 1969, “Die Mikrovibration”, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.Google Scholar
  13. Schulten, K., 1982, Magnetic field effects in chemistry and biology. Advances in Solid State Physics, 22: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wever, R., 1962–64, Zum Mechanismus der biologischen 24-Stunden-Periodik, Kybernetik, 1:139–154, 1:312–231, 2: 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wever, R., 1966, The duration of re-entrainment of circadian rhythms after phase shifts of the Zeitgeber. A theoretical consideration, J. Theor. Biol., 13:187–201.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Wever, R., 1967, Über die Beeinflussung der circadianen Periodik des Menschen durch schwache elektromagnetische Felder, Z. vergl. Physiol., 56:111–128.Google Scholar
  17. Wever, R. 1968a, Einfluss schwacher elektro-magnetischer Felder auf die circadiane Periodik des Menschen, Naturwissenschaften, 55: 29–32.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wever, R., 1968b, Mathematical models of circadian rhythmicity and their applicability to men, in: “Cycles Biologiques et Psychiatrie”, J. de Ajuriaguerra ed., Masson & Cie., Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Wever, R., 1968c, Gesetzmässigkeiten der circadianen Periodik des Menschen, geprüft an der Wirkung eines schwachen elektrischen Wechselfeldes, Pflügers Arch, 302: 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wever, R., 1969a, Autonome circadiane Periodik des Menschen unter dem Einfluss verschiedener Beleuchtungs-Bedingungen, Pflügers Arch, 306: 7 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wever, R., 1969b, “Untersuchungen zur circadianen Periodik des Menschen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Einflusses schwacher elektrischer Wechselfelder”, Bundesminst. Wiss. Forschg. Forschungsber. W 69–31.Google Scholar
  22. Wever, R., 1970, Zur Zeitgeber-Stärke eines Licht-Dunkel-Wechsels für die circadiane Periodik des Menschen, Pflügers Arch, 321: 133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wever, R., 1971a, Die circadiane Periodik des Menschen als Indikator för die biologische Wirkung elektromagnetischer Felder, Z. Physik. Med., 2:439–471.Google Scholar
  24. Wever, R., 1971b, Influence of electric fields on some parameters of circadian rhythms in man, in: “Biochronometry”, M. Menaker, ed., Nat. Acad. Sciences, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Wever, R., 1973a, Internal phase-angle differences in human circadian rhythms: causes for changes and problems of determinations, Int. J. Chronobiol., 1:371–390.Google Scholar
  26. Wever, R., 1973b, Human circadian rhythms under the influence of weak electric fields and the different aspects of these studies. Int. J. Biometeor., 17:227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wever, R., 1974a, ELF effects on human circadian rhythms, in: “ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects’, M. A. Persinger, ed.. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Wever, R., 1974b, The influence of self-controlled changes in ambient temperature on autonomous circadian rhythms in man. Pflügers Arch, 352: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wever, R., 1975a, The circadian multi-oscillator system of man. Int. J. Chronobiol., 3:19–55.Google Scholar
  30. Wever, R., 1975b, Autonomous circadian rhythms in man: singly versus collectively isolated subjects, Naturwissenschaften, 62: 443–444.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wever, R., 1977, Effects of low-level, low-frequency fields on human circadian rhythms, in: “Brain Interactions with Weak Electric and Magnetic Fields”, W. R. Adey and S. M. Bawin, eds., Neurosciences Res. Progr., Bull 15/1.Google Scholar
  32. Wever, R. A., 1979a, “The Circadian System of Man”, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wever, R. A., 1979b, Influence of physical workload on free-running circadian rhythms in man. Pflügers Arch, 381: 1 19–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wever, R. A., 1980, Phase shifts of human circadian rhythms due to shifts of artificial Zeitgebers, Chronobiologia, 7: 303–327.Google Scholar
  35. Wever, R. A., 1982, Behavioral aspects of circadian rhythmicity, in: “Rhythmic Aspects of Behavior”, F. M. Brown and R. C. Graeber, eds., L. Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale N.J.Google Scholar
  36. Wever, R. A., 1983, Toward a mathematical model of circadian rhythmicity, in: “Mathematical Models of the Circadian Sleep-Wake Cycle”, M. C. Moore-Ede and C. A. Czeisler, eds., Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Wever, R. A., 1984, Properties of human sleep-wake cycles: parameters of internally synchronized freerunning rhythms. Sleep, (in press).Google Scholar
  38. Wever, R. A., Polášek, J., and Wildgruber, C. M., 1983, Bright light affects human circadian rhythms. Pflügers Arch, 396: 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rütger A. Wever
    • 1
  1. 1.Arbeitsgruppe ChronobiologieMax-Planck-Institut für PsychiatrieAndechsGermany

Personalised recommendations