Advertisement

Immunological Aspects of the Infection

  • F. Ehrensperger
Part of the Developments in Veterinary Virology book series (DVVI, volume 5)

Abstracts

This chapter deals with various aspects of the humoral and cellular immune defense mechanisms as well as with some possible immunopathological events associated with hog cholera virus (HCV) infection in pigs.

Keywords

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus Canine Distemper Virus Bovine Viral Diarrhea Classical Swine Fever Equine Infectious Anemia Virus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Korn G: Die Verbreitung der Schweinepest unter Mitwirkung schwach virulenter Virusstämme. Mhft Tierheilk (15):97–106, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korn G, Hecke F: Nachweis eines sehr schwach virulenten, nicht immunisierenden Schweinepestvirus nach Virulenzsteigerung im Verlaufe von Tierpassagen. Zbl Vet Med B (11):40–49, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loan RW, Rodabaugh DE: Serological studies of hog cholera immunization. Am J Vet Res (27):1333–1338, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Segre D, Kaeberle ML: The immunologic behaviour of baby pigs. I. Production of antibodies in three week old pigs. J Immunol (39): 782–789, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korn G, Nishimura Y: Zum Nachweis unterschiedlich virulenter Schweinepestvirusstämme mit der END- und HEIC-Methode. Mhft Tierheil k (15):328–332, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbrey EA, Stewart WC, Young SH, Richardson GC: Transmission of hog cholera by pregnant sows. J Am Vet Med Assoc (149):23–30, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huck RA, Aston FW: The carrier sow in swine fever. Vet Rec (76): 1151–1154, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carbrey EA: The role of immune tolerance in transmission of hog cholera. J Am Vet Med Assoc (146):233–237, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Done JT, Harding JDJ: The relationship of maternal swine fever infection to cerebellar hypoplasia in piglets. Proc Roy Soc Med (59):1083–1084, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korn G: Zur intrauterinen Uebertragung von Schweinepestvirus von immunen Muttersauen auf ihre Ferkel. Zbl Vet Med B (13):473–488, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Kresse JI: Transplacental hog cholera infection in immune sows. Am J Vet Res (33):791–798, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Kresse JI: Transplacental hog cholera infection in susceptible sows. Am J Vet Res (34):637–640, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Kresse JI, Snyder ML: Transplacental hog cholera infection. In: Hog Cholera/Classical Swine Fever and African Swine Fever, publ by: Comm of the European Communities. EUR 5904 EN, 1977, pp 109–119.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Oirschot JT, Terpstra C: A congenital persistent swine fever infection. I. Clinical and virological observations. Vet Microbiol (2):121–123, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trautwein G, Richter-Reichhelm HB, von Benten K, Frey HR, Liess B: Experimental swine fever infection of the porcine fetus. Proc Symp Int Pig Vet Soc, Ames, Iowa, USA, H-8, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plateau E, Vannier Ph, Tillon JP: Atypical hog cholera infection: Viral isolation and clinical study of in utero transmission. Am J Vet Res (41):2012–2015, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young GA: Influence of virus infection, vaccination or both on embryonic and fetal development. Proc Book Am Vet Med Assoc, 1955, pp 377–381.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cowart WO, Morehouse LG: Effects of attenuated hog cholera virus in pregnant swine at various stages of gestation. J Am Vet Med Assoc (150):1321–1322, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunne HW, Clark CD: Embryonic death, fetal mummification, stillbirth, and neonatal death in pigs of gilts vaccinated with attenuated live-virus hog cholera vaccine. Am J Vet Res (29):787–796, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson KP, Ferguson LC, Byington DP, Redman DR: Multiple fetal malformations due to persistent viral infection. I. Abortion, intrauterine death, and gross abnormalities in fetal swine infected with hog cholera vaccine virus. Lab Invest (30):608–617, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meyer H: Experimentelle diaplazentare Infektion von Schweinefeten mit dem Virus der Europäischen Schweinepest — virologische und serologische Untersuchungen. Dissertation, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frey HR, Liess B, Richter-Reichhelm HB, von Benten K, Trautwein G: Experimental transplacental transmission of hog cholera virus in pigs. I. Virological and serological studies. Zbl Vet Med B (27):154–164, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Oirschot JT: Experimental production of congenital persistent swine fever infections. Effect on functions of the immune system. Vet Microbiol (4):133–147, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terpstra C, Tielen MJM: Antibody response against swine fever following vaccination with the C strain. Zbl Vet Med B (23):809–821, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Precausta P, Kato F, Brun A: Swine Fever. Immunization of piglets. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis (6):281–289, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liess B, Frey HR, Bucksch U, Roeder B, Frost J: Hog cholera viral antigens (brief review) and some recent results on the relationship to envelope antigens of bovine viral diarrhea — mucosal disease virions. In: Studies on Viral Replication, publ by: Comm of the European Communities, EUR 5451, 1976, pp 333–346.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodabaugh DE, Wright HB, Elder C: Hog cholera vaccination. J Am Vet Med Assoc (136):617–621, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt D, Bergmann H, Wittmann E: Zur Aetiologie der chronischen und der atypisch verlaufenden Schweinepest. Arch Exp Vet Med (19):149–156, 1965.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kovalenko, YaR, Sidorov MA, Yablonskaya IA: Level of protein nutrition and formation of immunity to swine fever. Vet sel-Khoz Nauk, Moskau (11):40–45, 1966. Abstr in Vet Bull (36):731.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kovalenko YaR, Sidorov MA, Tatarintsev NT: Dynamics of immuno-genesis in pigs against swine fever and erysipelas in relation to the protein content of the ration. Akad sel-Khoz Nauk, Moskau (10):32, 1967. Abstr in Vet Bull (38):456.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cheville NF, Mengeling WL: The pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera. Histologic, immunofluorescent, and electron microscopic studies. Lab Invest (20):261–274, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ressang AA: Studies on the pathogenesis of hog cholera. II. Virus distribution in tissue and the morphology of the immune response. Zbl Vet Med B (20):272–288, 1973.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richter-Reichhelm HB, Trautwein G, von Benten K, Liess B, Frey HR: Experimental transplacental transmission of hog cholera virus in pigs. II. Immunopathological findings in the fetus. Zbl Vet Med B (27):243–252, 1980.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Oirschot JT: Experimental production of congenital persistent swine fever infections. I. Clinical, pathological and virological observations. Vet Microbiol (4):117–132, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Oirschot JT: Congenital infections with nonarbo togavi-ruses. Vet Microbiol (8):321–361, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Loan RW, Gustafson DP: Persistent infections of subculturable swine buffy coat cells with hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (25):1120–1123, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kresse JI, Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Snyder ML: Sensitivity of swine buffy coat culture to infection with hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (27):1315–1318, 1976.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Korn G, Lorenz RJ: Untersuchungen zur Vermehrung des Virus der Europäischen Schweinepest in Makrophagen- und Lymphozyten-Kultu-ren von normalen und immunen Tieren. Zbl Bakt Hyg I Abt Orig A (236):150–162, 1976.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Oirschot JT: Persistent and inapparent infections with swine fever virus of low virulence. Their effects on the immune system. PhD thesis, State University of Utrecht, 1980.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mims CA: Factors in the mechanism of persistence of viral infections. Progr Med Virol (18):1–14, 1974.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Korn G, Matthaeus W: Studien über die im Verlauf der Schweinepesterkrankung auftretenden Antikörperarten und ihre Zugehörigkeit zu Antigenen. Zbl Vet Med B (24):274–286, 1977.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matthaeus W, Korn G: Die neutralisierenden Antikörper im Schwein nach experimenteller Infektion mit Schweinepestvirus. Zbl Vet Med B (13):173–180, 1967.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matthaeus W, Korn G: Serumproteinveränderungen und klinische Symptome bei verschiedenen Verlaufsformen der Schweinepest. Zbl Vet Med B (13):558–569, 1966.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Korn G, Lorenz RJ: Zur Korrelation des Auftretens von Schweinepestvirus und Chymotrypsin in vivo und vitro sowie zur serologischen Spezifität dieses Chymotrypsins. Tierärztl Umschau (9):1–7, 1979.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Terpstra C: The use of immunoelectro-osmophoresis as a possible aid in the diagnosis of swine fever. Zbl Vet Med B (25):576–585, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Ehrensperger F: to be published, 1986.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Korn G, Matthaeus W, Lorenz RJ, Jakubik J: Ueber eine Globulin-(Transferrin-) und Antikörperbildungsstörung während des Leuko-peniestadiums der Schweinepesterkrankung. Z Immun Forsch (145): 139–155, 1973.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mengeling WL, Packer RA: Pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera: Host response. Am J Vet Res (30):409–417, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Corthier G, Labadie JP, Petit E: Réponse immunitaire humorale et cellulaire du porc consécutive à la vaccination ou à l’infection subclinique par le virus de la peste porcine classique. Bull Acad Vét France (50):425–433, 1977.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Corthier G: Cellular and humoral immune response in pigs given vaccinal and chronic hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (39):1841–1844, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Remond M, Plateau E, Cruciere C: In vitro study of the cellular response of pigs vaccinated against classical swine fever. Zbl Vet Med B (28):743–748, 1981.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hermanns W, Trautwein G, Meyer H, Liess B: Experimental transplacental transmission of hog cholera in pigs. V. Immunopathological findings in newborn pigs. Zbl Vet Med B (28):669–683, 1981.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Van der Molen EJ, van Oirschot JT: Congenital persistent swine fever. I. Pathomorphological lesions in lymphoid tissues, kidney and adrenal. Zbl Vet Med B (28):89–101, 1981.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Singer DB, South MA, Montgomery JR, Rawls WE, Boriuk M: Congenital rubella syndrome. Lymphoid tissue and immunological status. Am J Dis Child (118):54–61, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ohmann HB: Experimental fetal infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus. II. Morphological reactions and distribution of viral antigen. Can J Comp Med (46):363–369, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sweasy D, Patterson DSP, Richardson C, Harkness JW, Shaw IG, Williams WW: Border Disease: a sequential study of surviving lambs and an assessment of its effect on profitability. Vet Rec (104):447–450, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Van Oirschot JT: A congenital persistent swine fever infection. II. Immune response to swine fever virus and unrelated antigens. Vet Microbiol (2):133–142, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Meyer H, Liess B, Frey HR, Hermanns W, Trautwein G: Experimental transplacental transmission of hog cholera virus in pigs. IV. Virological and serological studies in newborn pigs. Zbl Vet Med B (28):659–668, 1981.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Baker JA, Sheffy E: A persistent hog cholera viremia in young pigs. Proc Soc Exp Biol (105):675–678, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liess B, Frey HR, Prager D, Hafez SM, Roeder B: The course of the natural swine fever virus infection in individual swine and investigations on the development of inapparent swine fever infections. In: Diagnosis and Epizootology of CSF, publ by: Comm of the European Communities, EUR 5486, 1976, pp 99–113.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pirtle EC: In vitro spread of hog cholera viral infection from cell to cell. Demonstration of viral antigen in dividing cells. Am J Vet Res (30):1909–1912, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cradock-Watson JE, Ridehalgh MKS, Anderson MJ, Pattison JR, Kangro HO: Fetal infection resulting from maternal rubella after the first trimester of pregnancy. J Hyg (85):381–391, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brown TT, Schultz RD, Duncan JR, Bistner SI: Serological response of bovine fetuses to bovine viral diarrhea virus. Infect Immun (25):93–97, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Terpstra C: Border Disease: virus persistence, antibody response and transmission studies. Res Vet Sci (30):185–191, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rawls WE: Viral persistence in congenital rubella. Prog Med Virol (18):273–288, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Me Guire TC: Suppression of synthesis of an IgG subclass in a persistent viral infection. Equine infectious anemia. Immunol (30):17–24, 1976.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Trautwein G: Untersuchungen über die Pathogenese der Aleutenkrankheit der Nerze. Veränderungen der Serumproteine. Zbl Vet Med B (16):738–752, 1969.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Henson JB, Gorham JR, Mc Guire TC, Crawford TB: Pathology and pathogenesis of Aleutian disease. In: Kimberlin RH (ed), Slow Virus Diseases of Animals and Man. North Holland Publ Comp Amsterdam, 1976, pp 175–205.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Purchase HG: Marek’s disease virus and the herpes virus of turkeys. Progr Med Virol (18):178–197, 1974.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pan, IC, De Boer CJ, Heuschele WP: Hypergammaglobulinemia in swine infected with African Swine Fever virus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med (134):367–371, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Charley B, Corthier G, Houdayer M, Rouzé P: Modifications des réactions immunitaires au cours de la peste porcine classique. Ann Rech Vét (11):27–33, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Buimovici-Klein E, Vesikari T, Santangelo CF, Cooper LZ: Studies of the lymphocytes in vitro response to rubella antigen and Phytohaemagglutinin by a whole blood method. Arch Virol (52):323–331, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Steck F, Lazary S, Fey H, Wandeler A, Huggler Ch, Oppliger G, Baumberger H, Kaderli R, Martig J: Immune responsiveness in cattle fatally affected by BVD-MD. Zbl Vet Med B (27):429–445, 1980.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Johnson DW, Muscoplat CC: Immunologic abnormalities in calves with chronic bovine viral diarrhea. Am J Vet Res (34): 1139–1141, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Purchase HG, Chubb RC, Biggs PM: Effect of lymphoid leucosis and Marek’s disease on the immunological responsiveness of the chicken. J Nat Cancer Inst (40):583–592, 1966.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lodmell DL, Hadlow WJ, Munoz JJ, Whitford HW: Hemagglutinin antibody response of normal and Aleutian disease-affected mink to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. J Immunol (104):878–887, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Krakowka S, Cockerell G, Koestner A: Intradermal mitogen response in dogs: Correlation with outcome of infection by canine distemper virus. Am J Vet Res (38):1539–1542, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lehmann-Grube F, Niemeyer I, Löhler J: Lymphocytic choriomeningitis of the mouse. IV. Depression of allograft reaction. J Med Microbiol Immunol (158):16–25, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Perryman LE, Banks KL, Me Gui re TC: Lymphocyte abnormalities in Aleutian disease virus infection of mink: decreased T lymphocyte responses and increased B lymphocyte levels in persistent viral infection. J Immunol (115):22–27, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    An SH, Wilkie BN: Mitogen- and viral antigen-induced transformation of lymphocytes from normal mink and from mink with progressive or nonprogressive Aleutian Disease. Infect Immun (34):111–114, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lu YS, Lapen RF: Splenic mitogenic response in Marek’s Disease: Comparison between non-infected tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing infected chickens. Am J Vet Res (35):977–980, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Krakowka S, Cockerell G, Koestner A: Effects on canine distemper virus infection on lymphoid function in vitro and in vivo. Infect Immun (11):1069–1078, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kono Y, Sentsui H, Murakami Y: Lymphocyte response to specific viral antigen and nonspecific mitogens in horses infected with equine infectious anemia virus. Proc IV. Int Conf Equine Inf Dis, Lyon, Vet Public Princeton, 1976.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gottlieb MS, Schroff R, Schanker HM, Weisman JD, Fan PT, Wolf RA, Saxon A: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and mucosal candidiasis in previously healthy homosexual men. Evidence of a new acquired cellular immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med (305):1425–1431, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Letvin NL, Eaton KA, Aldrich WR, Sehgal PK, Blake BJ, Schlossman SF, King NW, Hunt RD: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in a colony of macaque monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (80):2718–2722, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mathes LE, Olsen RG, Hebebrand LC, Hoover EA, Schaller JP: Abrogation of lymphocyte blastogenesis by a feline leukemia virus protein. Nature (274):687–689, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Coria MF, Mc Clurkin AW: Specific immune tolerance in an apparently healthy bull persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc (172):449–451, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Korn G: lieber sensibilisierende Wirksamkeit sehr schwach virulenten nicht immunisierenden Schweinepestvirus sowie einer hochgradigen Virulenzsteigerung durch den sensibilisierten Organismus. Zbl Vet Med B (11):119–134, 1964.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dunne HW, Luedke AJ: The pathogenesis of hog cholera. II. The virus eclipse phase and sensitization of the host. Am J Vet Res (20):520–624, 1959.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Bolin SR, Mc Clurkin AW, Cutlip RC, Coria MF: Severe clinical disease induced in cattle persistently infected with noncyto-pathic bovine viral diarrhea virus by superinfection with cyto-pathic bovine viral diarrhea virus. Am J Vet Res (46):573–576, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Van Oirschot JT, De Jong D, Huffel s NDHJ: Response of lymphocytes from blood and lyphoid organs from infected and normal pigs to PHA, PWM, Con A, and swine fever virus antigen and enumeration of lymphocyte subpopulations. Vet Microbiol (8):81–95, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Liess B: Pathogenese virusbedingter Darminfektionen der Tiere. (Uebersichtsreferat) Dtsch Tierärztl Wschr (80):360–364, 1973.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Liess B, Frey HR, Kittsteiner H, Baumann F, Neumann W: Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen über die “Mucosal Disease” des Rindes -einer immunbiologisch erklärbaren Spätform der BVD-MD-Virusinfektion mit Kriterien einer “slow virus infection”? Dtsch Tierärztl Wschr (81):481–487, 1974.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Klaus GGB, Howard JG, Feldmann M: Mechanisms of B-cell tolerance. Br Med Bull (32): 141–146, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Weigle WO: Immunological unresponsiveness. Adv Immunol (16):61–122, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stumpf R, Heuer J, Kölsch E: Suppressor T-cells in low zone tolerance. I. Mode of action of suppressor cells. Eur J Immunol (7): 74–80, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Stockinger B: Cytotoxic T-cell precursors revealed in neonatally tolerant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci (81):220–223, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Nossal GJV, Pike BL: Functional clonal deletion in immunological tolerance to major histocompatibility complex antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci (78):3844–3847, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hellström I, Hellström KE, Evans ChA, Heppner GH, Pierce GE, Yang JPS: Serum mediated protection of neoplastic cells from inhibition by lymphocytes immune to their tumor-specific antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (62):362–368, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Oldstone MBA, Dixon FJ: Lymphocytic choriomeningitis production of antibody by “tolerant” infected mice. Science (158):1193–1195, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Ehrensperger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations