Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Veterinary Virology ((DVVI,volume 5))

Abstract

A tentative diagnosis of hog cholera (HC) may be made in the field if a thorough history is obtained and clinical signs and necropsy lesions are carefully observed (1, 2). In many instances there have been recent additions to the herd, or there is illness in herds in the neighborhood. With acute HC, deaths occur, and usually there have been unexplained deaths in advance of the outbreak. The recent use of HC vaccines or the feeding of uncooked garbage may be important points in the history (3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Matthews REF: Togaviridae. In: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. S Karger, Basel, Switzerland: pp. 97–101, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carbrey EA: Hog Cholera. In: Foreign Animal Diseases, U.S. Animal Health Assoc, Suite 205, 6924 Lakeside Ave., Richmond VA 23228: pp. 202–215, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart, WC: Hog Cholera. In: Diseases of Swine, Fifth Edition. (Ed. AD Leman et al.) The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA: pp. 224–236, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young SH: The use of supplemental tests in the diagnosis and eradication of hog cholera. J Am Vet Med Assoc (157): 1855–1859, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stair EL, Rhodes MB, Aiken JM, Underdahl HR, Young GA: A hog cholera virus-fluorescent antibody system. Its potential use in study of embryonic infection. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med (113): 656–660, 1963.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aiken JM, Hoopes KH, Stair EL, Rhodes MB: Rapid diagnosis of hog cholera: A tissue-impress ion fluorescent antibody technique. J Am Vet Med Assoc (144): 1395–1397, 1964.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bedell D, Chairman: Recommended minimum standards for detecting hog cholera viral antigen by the fluorescent antibody tissue section technique. In: “Proceedings”, Annual Meeting, U.S. Livestock Sanitary Assoc (72): 440–443, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kubin G, Kolbl O: Leistungsfähigkeit der Gefrierschnitt-Immunofluoreszenz-Methode zur Diagnose der Schweinepest. Wien Tierärztl Monatsschr (55): 578–586, 1968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson A, Bannister GL, Boulanger P, Apple M, Gray DP: Hog cholera V. Demonstration of the antigen in swine tissues by the fluorescent antibody technique. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci (29): 299–305, 1965.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann T: Zur Diagnose der Europäischen Schweinepest mit der Immunofluoreszenz-Methode. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr (74): 250–252, 1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carbrey EA, Erickson GA, Metz CA: Diagnosis of hog Cholera. Prev Vet Med (2): 103–108, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nabuto K, Sato U, Sawada M: An instrument for harvesting tonsillar material for diagnosis of hog cholera. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (10): 94–95, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mengeling WL, Gutekunst DE, Fernelius AL, Pirtle EC: Demonstration of an antigenic relationship between hog cholera and bovine viral diarrhea viruses by immunofluorescence. Canad J Comp Med Vet Sci (27): 162–164, 1963.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cottral E, edit.: Hog Cholera Virus. In: Manual of Standardized Methods for Veterinary Microbiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York: pp. 311–318, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dunne, HW.: Hog Cholara. In: “Diseases of Swine”, Fourth Edition. (Ed. HW Dunne and AD Leman), The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA: pp. 189–255, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillespie JH, Sheffy BE, Baker JA: Propagation of hog cholera virus in tissue culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med (105): 679–681, 1960.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mengeling WL, Pirtle EC, Torrey JP: Identification of hog cholera viral antigen by immunofluorescence. Application as a diagnostic and assay method. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci (27): 249–252, 1963.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carbrey EA, Stewart WC, Kresse JI, Snyder ML: Natural infection of pigs with bovine viral diarrhea virus and its differential diagnosis for hog cholera. J Am Vet Med Ass (169): 1217–1219, 1976.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mengeling, WL, Torrey JP: Evaluation of the fluorescent antibody-cell culture test for hog cholera diagnosis. Am J Vet Res (28): 1653–15659, 1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McNutt SH, Dunne HW, Ray JD, Sorenson DK, Torrey JP: A standard method using animal inoculation for the detection of hog cholera virus. In: “Proceedings”, Annual Meeting, US Livestock Sanitary Assoc (67): 597–598, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carbrey EA, McDaniel HA, Stewart WC, Henry EJ, Dresse JI: Comparison of tissue section and cell culture immunofluorescent techniques for the detection of hog cholera infection in experimentally infected pigs. In: “Proceedings”, Annual Meeting, US Anim Health Assoc (74): 502–514, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liess B: Hog cholera. In: “Virus Diseases of Food Animals” (Ed. EPJ Gibbs), Academic Press, London: pp 627–650, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Darbyshire JH: A serological relationship between swine fever and mucosal disease of cattle. Vet Rec (72): 331, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kresse JI, Stewart WC, Carbrey EA, Snyder ML: End-point dilution-fluorescent antibody technique for cloning hog cholera virus. Am J Vet Res (43): 497–498, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dale CN, Schoening HW, Cole CG, Henly RR, Zinober MR: Variations (variants) of hog cholera virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc (118): 279–285, 1951.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pirtle EC, Mengeling WL: Antigenic differences in two hog cholera virus strains. Am J Vet Res (32): 1473–1477, 1971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lai SS, Huang TS, Ho WC, Tsao SH: Antigenic differences between virulent and attenuated strains of hog cholera viruses by immunodiffusion test. J Chinese Soc Vet Sci (9): 139–144, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aynaud JM, Corthier G, Vannier P, Tillon JP: Swine fever: In vitro and in vivo properties of low virulent strains isolated in breeding farms having reproductive failures. In: “Hog Cholera/Classical Swine Fever and African Swine Fever”, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Publication EUR 5904: pp. 273–290, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kamijyo Y, Ohkuma SI, Shimizu M: Differences in pathogenicity and antigenicity among hog cholera virus strains. Nat Inst Anim Health Q (17): 133–140, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shimizu M, Shimizu Y: Properties of hog cholera viruses recently isolated in Japan. Nat Inst Anim Health Q (23): 103–104, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carbrey EA, Stewart WC, Kresse JI, Snyder ML: Persistent hog cholera infection detected during virulence typing of 135 field isolates. Am J Vet Res (41): 946–949, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Oirschot JT: Experimental production of congenital persistent swine fever infections. I. Clinical, pathological and virological observations. Vet Microbiol (4): 117–132, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Oirschot JT: Experimental production of congenital persistent swine fever infections. II. Effect on functions of the immune system. Vet Microbiol (4): 133–147, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liess B: Persistent infections of hog cholera: a review. Prev Vet Med (2): 109–113, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Harkness JW: Classical swine fever and its diagnosis: a current view. Vet Rec (116): 288–293, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Aynaud JM, Galicher G, Lombard J, Bibard C, Mierzejewska M: Swine fever: Identifying factors (genetic markers) of the virus, in relation to pathogenicity for the pig. Ann Rech Veter (3): 209–235, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nakamura S, Sasahara J, Shimizu M, Shimizu Y: Replication of hog cholera virus in porcine alveolar macrophage cultures. Nat Inst Anim Health Q (23): 101–102, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carbrey, E.A. (1988). Diagnostic Procedures. In: Liess, B. (eds) Classical Swine Fever and Related Viral Infections. Developments in Veterinary Virology, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2083-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2083-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9235-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2083-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics