Magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck tumors

  • Keith E. Kortman
  • James T. Helsper
  • Wilson S. Wong
  • William G. Bradley
Part of the Cancer Treatment and Research book series (CTAR, volume 32)


Effective therapy of head and neck tumors depends on accurate assessment of tumor size, extent, and nodal spread. Physical and endoscopic examination remain the foundation of the clinical staging procedure. They are the most accurate methods of assessing mucosal involvement by tumor. Deep extension of tumor cannot be visualized directly, but can often be inferred by alterations in mucosal contours. Direct or indirect visualization of the vocal cords remains the most effective method of evaluating laryngeal function. In addition, physical examination is the easiest method of evaluating lymphadenopathy, although it is somewhat limited by node location and interobserver variation.


Parotid Gland High Resolution Compute Tomography Acoustic Neuroma Thyroglossal Duct Cyst Compute Tomography Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stark, D.D., Moss, A.A., Gamsu, G., Clark, O.H., Gooding, G.A.W., Webb, W.R. 1984. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck, Part I: normal anatomy. Radiology 150: 447–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stark, D.D., Moss, A.A., Gamsu, G., Clark, O.H., Gooding, G.A.W., Webb, W.R. 1984. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck, Part II: pathologic findings. Radiology 150: 455–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley, W.G., Crooks, L.E., Newton, T.H. 1983. Physical principles of NMR. In: Advanced Imaging Techniques, Vol. II (T.H. Newton, D.G. Potts, eds.). Clavadel Press, San Francisco, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley, W.G. 1984. Effect of magnetic relaxation times on magnetic resonance image interpretation. Noninvas. Med. Imag. 1: 193–204.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crooks, L.E., Ortendahl, D.A., Kaufman, L. et al. 1983. Clinical efficacy of NMR imaging. Radiology 146: 123–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waluch, V., Bradley, W.G. 1984. NMR Even echo rephasing in slow laminar flow. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 8: 594–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dooms, G.C., Hricak, H., Moseley, M.E., Bottles, K., Fisher, M., Higgins, C.B. 1985. Characterization of lymphadenopathy by magnetic resonance relaxation times: preliminary results. Radiology 155: 691–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hans, J.C., Huss, R.G., Benson, J.E. et al. 1985. MR imaging of the skull-base. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 5: 944–952.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    New, P.F.J., Bachow, P.D., Wismer, G.L. et al. 1985. MR imaging of the acoustic nerves in small acoustic neuromas at 0.6 T: Prospective study. A.J.N.R. 2: 175–170.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dillon, W.P., Mills, C.M., Kjos, B., Droot, J., Brant-Zawadski, M. 1984. Magnetic resonance imaging of the nasopharynx. Radiology 152: 731–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lufkin, R.B., Hanafee, W.N.. 1985. Application of surface coils to MR anatomy of larynx. A.J.N.R. 6: 491–497.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lufkin, R.B., Hanafee, W.N., Wortham, D. et al. 1985. Larynx and hypopharynx: MR image with surface coils. Radiology 158: 747–757.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dooms, G.C., Hricak, H., Crooks, L.E., Higgins, C.B. 1984. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: Comparison with CT. Radiology 153: 179–728.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith E. Kortman
  • James T. Helsper
  • Wilson S. Wong
  • William G. Bradley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations