Advertisement

Interfacial Reaction Between Bioactive Glass and Synthetic Physiological Solution

  • Panjian Li
  • Feipeng Zhang
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR, volume 21)

Abstract

It has been shown that the reaction of bioglass with synthetic physiological solution at 40°C can be divided into three stages. In the first stage, the weight loss was found to be proportional to the reaction time and to the thickness of the silica-rich layer which formed on the surface of the glass. During the second stage, the weight loss was found to slow down gradually, and the concentration of Na, Ca, Si, and P in the reacted solution increased. Also, at the beginning of the second stage, hydroxyapatite appeared on the silica-rich layer in the crystal phase. In the third stage, the weight of the sample did not change with reaction time, which meant that the system reached equilibrium. The time of each stage depended on the glass composition. These phenomena were satisfactorily explained by the theoretical model of the electric double layer formed between the bioglass and the synthetic physiological solution.

Keywords

Electric Double Layer Glass Composition Physiological Solution Chemical Durability Charge Density Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. P. Hulbert, L. L. Hench, D. Forbes and L. S. Bowman, History of bioceramic, in: Ceramic in Surgery, P. Vincenzini, ed., Elsevier Science Publisher B. V., (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. L. Hench, An investigation of bonding mechanisms at tne interface of a prosthetic material, Report 1–9, U. S. Army Reseach and Department Command, Contract No. DATA 17-70-C-001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. L. Hench, E. C. Ethridge, Biomaterial, Academic, New York, (1982), 126Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Fujiu, M. Ogino, M. Kariya and T. Ichimura, New explanation for the bonding behavior of fluorine containing bioglass, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 56: 417 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. E. Clark, Jr., C. G. Pantano, Jr., L. L. Hench, Auger spectrosocopy analysis of bioglass corrosion films, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 59: 37 (1976).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. G. Pantano, Jr., A. E. Clark, Jr., L. L. Hench, Multilayer corrosion films on bioglass surface, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 57: 412 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Ogino, L. L. Hench, Formation of calcium phosphate films on silicate glass, J. Non-crystal Solids 38 and 39: 673 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. H. Thomassin et al., Mechanisms of interaction of bioglass in the system SiO2-Na2O-CaO-P2O5 with simulated biological media, XIII Int. Glaskongress, 4–9 Juli 1983Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. M„ Mularie, Influence of surface potential of the kinetics of glass reaction with aqueous solutions, J. Mater. Sci. 14: 2659 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. M. Sullivan et al., J. Non-cryst. solids 55: 269 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. M. Horn, Jr., G. V. Onoda, Jr., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62:523 (l978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. J. Charles, Stress induced binary diffusion in a solid, J. Electrochem. Soc. 116: 1514 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panjian Li
    • 1
  • Feipeng Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouP.R. China

Personalised recommendations