Advertisement

Intracranial Self-Stimulation Studies with Nicotine

  • Paul B. S. Clarke
  • R. Kumar
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 31)

Abstract

More than thirty years ago James Olds and Peter Milner (1954) fortuitously observed that a rat would return to the place in an open field where it had previously received electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) delivered via a septal electrode. Subsequently, it was found that rats and many other species including man would learn to perform arbitrarily assigned tasks in order to obtain electrical stimulation at certain sites in the brain (see Olds, 1977). This behavior, termed “self-stimulation” or “intracranial self-stimulation” (ICSS), appeared to offer a direct handle on putative systems in the brain responsible for pleasure or reward.

Keywords

Brain Stimulation Chronic Nicotine Stimulant Action Medial Forebrain Bundle Psychomotor Stimulant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bignami, G and Michalek, H: Cholinergic mechanisms and aversively motivated behaviors. In (eds.) Anisman, H and Bignami, G, Psychopharmacology of Aversively Motivated Behavior, Plenum, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, PBS: Chronic central nicotinic blockade after a single injection of the bisquaternary ganglion blocking drug chlorisondamine. Br. J. Pharmac. 83:527–535, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, PBS and Kumar, R: Nicotine does not improve discrimination of brain stimulation reward by rats. Psychopharmac. 79:271–277, 1983a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke, PBS and Kumar, R: Effects of nicotine on locomotor activity in non-tolerant and tolerant rats. Br. J. Pharmac. 78:329–337, 1983b.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, PBS and Kumar, R: Characterization of the locomotor stimulant action of nicotine in tolerant rats. Br. J. Pharmac. 80:587–594, 1983c.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, PBS and Kumar, R: Effects of nicotine and amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in a shuttle box in rats. Psychopharmac. 84:109–114, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, BM, Goldstein, A and Nelson, WT: Nicotine self-administration in rats. Br. J. Pharmac. 83:49–55, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Fibiger, HC: The neurobiological substrates of depression in Parkinson’s Disease: a hypothesis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 11:105–107, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldberg, SR: this volume, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. Iwamoto, ET: this volume, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. Justeson, DR, Sharp, JC, and Porter, PB: Self-stimulation of the caudate nucleus by instrumentally naive cats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 56:371–374, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar, R and Lader, MH: Nicotine and smoking. In (eds.) Essman, WB and Valzelli, L, Current Developments in Psychopharmacology, Vol. 6, pp 127–164, Spectrum, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Morrison, CF: Effects of nicotine on operant behavior of rats. Int. J. Neuropharmac. 6:229–240, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morrison, CF and Lee, PN: A comparison of the effects of nicotine and physostigmine on a measure of activity in the rat. Psychopharmac. 13:210–221, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morrison, CF and Stephenson, JA: The occurrence of tolerance to a central depressant effect of nicotine. Br. J. Pharmac. 46:151–156, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, LM: Effects of cholinergic agonists and antagonists on intracranial self-stimulation behavior in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 79:394–413, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olds, Jl Self-stimulation of the brain. Science 127:315–324, 1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olds, J and Milner, PM: Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of the rat brain. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47:419–427, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olds, ME and Olds, J: ApproacTPavoidance analysis of rat diencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 120:259–295, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olds, J and Domino EF: Comparison of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic agonists on self-stimulation behavior. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 166:189–204, 1969a.Google Scholar
  21. Olds, J and Domino, EF: Differential effects of cholinergic agonists on intracranial self-stimulation and escape behavior. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 170:157–167, 1969b.Google Scholar
  22. Olds, J: Drives and Reinforcements. Raven Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. Pert, A and Clark, P: this volume, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Phillips, AG: Brain reward circuitry: a case for separate neural systems. Brain Res. Bull. 12:195–201, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pradhan, SN and Bowling, C: Effects of nicotine on self-stimulation in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 176:229–243, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rolls, ET and Kelly, PH: Neural basis of stimulus-bound locomotor activity in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:173–182, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shizgal, P and Matthews, G: Electrical stimulation of the rat diencephalon: Differential effects of interrupted stimulation on on-and off-responding. Brain Res. 129:319–333, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skinner, BF: The Behavior of Organisms. Octavo, New York, 1938.Google Scholar
  29. Stitzer, M, Morrison, J, and Domino, EF: Effects of nicotine on fixed interval behavior and modification by cholinergic antagonists. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 171:165–177, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. Valenstem, ES: Problems of measurement and interpretation with reinforcing brain stimulation. Psychol. Rev. 71:415–437, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valenstein, ES and Meyers, W: A rate-independent test of reinforcing consequences of brain stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57:52–60, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Valenstein, ES: Stereotypy and sensorimotor changes evoked by hypothalamic stimulation: possible relation to schizophrenic behavior patterns. In (ed.) Routtenberg, A, Biology of Reinforcent: Facets of Brain Stimulation Reward. Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  33. Wanner, HU and Battig, K: Wirkung von Nikotin und Amphetamin auf die Selbstreizung bei der Ratte. Helv. Physiol. et Pharm. Acta. 24: C122–124, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. White, NZ, Brown, M and Yachim, P: Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav. 9:273–278, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul B. S. Clarke
    • 1
  • R. Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research Dept. of PsychiatryUniv. of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Dept. of Psychiatry Institute of PsychiatryUniv. of LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations