Advertisement

Recent Results from the University of California Weak Matrix Element Calculation

  • C. Bernard
  • T. Draper
  • G. Hockney
  • A. Soni
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 159)

Abstract

For several years now we have been making a major effort to calculate hadronic matrix elements of weak operators by lattice Monte Carlo methods. Some of the basic techniques were described at the Argonne, Tallahassee, and Wuppertal Conferences;1–3 results of a “first generation” calculation were published last year.4 Since that time we have accumulated considerably more data: we have greatly increased the number of configurations on our original small lattice (63 × 17 at β = 5.7) and have gone on to examine two larger lattice sizes: 103 × 20 at β = 5.7 to look at finite size effects and 123 × 33 at β = 6.1 to look at scaling. Here, we present the new results from the small lattice and the preliminary results from the larger lattices (where we are_continuing to accumulate statistics). We treat primarily the KO-KO mixing and K → π ΔI = 3/2 amplitudes, where the theoretical situation is more or less clear; however, our current approach to the problems of calculating the K → π ΔI = 1/2 amplitude is also briefly described, and is used to obtain some very preliminary numerical results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Bernard, “Lattice Calculation of Hadronic Weak Matrix Elements: The ΔI = 1/2 Rule,” in C. Zachos, et al., eds., Gauge Theory on a Lattice: 1984 ,National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Bernard, T. Draper, H. D. Politzer, and A. Soni, “Lattice Calculation of Weak Matrix Elements: A Progress Report,” in D.W. Duke and J. F. Owens, eds., Advances in Lattice Gauge Theory ,World Scientific, Singapore, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Bernard, T. Draper, G. Hockney, and A. Soni, “Calculation of Weak Matrix Elements: Some Technical Aspects,” in B. Bunk, K. H. Mutter and K. Schilling, eds., Lattice Gauge Theory: A Challenge in Large Scale Computing ,Plenum, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Bernard, T. Draper, G. Hockney, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2770 (1985) .ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Cabibbo, G. Martinelli, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B244, 381 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5a.
    R. C. Brower, M. B. Gavela, R. Gupta, and G. Maturana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 ,1318 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    S. Gottlieb, P. MacKenzie, H. Thacker, and D. Weingarten, Nucl. Phys. B263, 704 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6a.
    S. Gottlieb, P. MacKenzie, H. Thacker, and D. Weingarten,Phys. Lett. 134B (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    C. Bernard et al., Phys. Rev. D32, 2343 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    We thank G. Martinelli for correspondence which contributed to our understanding of this point.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    S. Sharpe etal., University of Washington Preprint UW/400 48-11 P6, and talk presented at this conference.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, G. Rossi, and M. Testa, CERN Preprint TH. 4447 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 10a.
    M. Bochicchio et al., Nucl. Phys. B262, 331 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    C. Bernard, T. Draper, and K. Olynyk, Phys. Rev. D27, 227 (1983) .ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    N. Cabibbo and E. Marinari, Phys. Lett. 119B, 387 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 12a.
    A. Kennedy and B. Pendleton, Phys. Lett. 156B, 393 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 13.
    K. H. Mutter, talk presented at this conference.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    J. Jennings, UCLA Preprint, in preparation.Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    D. Barkai, K. J. M. Moriarty, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D30, 1293 (1984); S. Otto (private communication).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 16.
    L. Maiani and G. Martinelli, talk presented at the 23rd International Conference on High Energy Physics, Berkeley, 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    C. Bernard, T. Draper, and A. Soni, UCLA Preprint, in preparation.Google Scholar
  22. 18.
    G. Martinelli, Phys. Lett. 141B, 395 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 19.
    H. Tsuchida, UCLA Preprint, in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Bernard
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. Draper
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Hockney
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Soni
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations