Advertisement

Estimating Residual Strength in Filament Wound Casings from Nondestructive Evaluation of Impact Damage

  • Eric I. Madaras
  • Clarence C. PoeJr.
  • Walter Illg
  • Joseph Heyman
Conference paper
Part of the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation book series (RPQN, volume 6 A)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the ability to detect hidden impact damage in thick composites caused by low velocity impact and to predict the remaining strength of those materials. An impact study has been undertaken on filament wound graphite/epoxy casings, such as those proposed for NASA’s space shuttle solid fuel rocket boosters. In thick composite materials, low-velocity impact damage may not be visually evident, depending on the impacter shape; yet the damage may compromise the composite’s ultimate strength. A model of a filament wound casing was fabricated with one fifth of the diameter (30 inches) but with the full thickness (1.4inches) of the full rocket motor (12 feet and 1.4 inches, respectively). It was impacted with various masses and energy levels using a one inch diameter ball as the indenter. This casing was subsequently cut into coupons of 2 in. width by 12 in. length. These samples were nondestructively examined for the degree of damage. Next, these samples were loaded in tension until failure. Efforts to accurately detect the damage with dye penetrants and x-ray methods have proven unsatisfactory in the samples that displayed no visible damage. In spite of the high attenuation of this material, ultrasonic phase velocity and attenuation images show promise in predicting the residual strength of the coupons. Predictions of the damage profile, and therefore the cross-section of the damage in the direction of loading, were obtained by assuming an “effective” value for the attenuation of the damaged part of the filament wound casing material (15 dB/MHz-cm) and an “effective” value for the velocity of the damaged part of the filament wound casing material (2250 m/s). These estimates were based partially on measurements made on impact damaged thin composite material. The remaining strength predictions from these ultrasonic data showed a significant improvement over the x-ray predictions of remaining strength and the method may be usable for predictions of remaining strength of full scale rocket motors that may have suffered impact damage.

Keywords

Residual Strength Impact Damage Rocket Motor Break Fiber Fiber Breakage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    A. E. H. Love, “The Stress Produced in a Semi-infinite Solid by Pressure on Part of the Boundary”, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. A, 228 (1929) pp. 377–420.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. B. Greszczuk, “Damage in Composite Materials due to Low Velocity Impact”, Impact Dynamics, ( John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1982 ) pp. 55–94.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. C. Poe, Jr., W. Illg, and D. P. Garber, “A Program to Determine the Effect of Low-Velocity Impacts on the Strength of the Filament-Wound Rocket Motor Case for the Space Shuttle”, NASA Technical Memorandum 87588, (Sept. 1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. C. Poe, Jr., W. Illg, and D. P. Garber, “Tension Strength of a Thick Graphite/Epoxy Laminate after Impact by a 1/2 In. Radius Impacter”, NASA Technical Memorandum 87771, (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. C. Newman, Jr., and I. S. Raju, “Stress-Intensity Factor Equations for Cracks in Three-Dimensional Finite Bodies”, Fracture Mechanics: Fourteenth Symposium — Volume I: Theory and Analysis, ASTM STP 791, J. C. Lewis and G. Sines, Eds., (American Society for Testing Materials, 1983) pp. I-238–I-265.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. S. Raju, and J. C. Newman, Jr., “Stress-Intensity Factors for a Wide Range of Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in Finite-Thickness Plates”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol 11, No. 4, (1979) pp. 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. H. Cantrell, Jr., W. P. Winfree, J. S. Heyman, and J. D. Whitcomb, “Multiparameter Characterization of Fatigue Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Composites from Ultrasonic Transmission Power Spectra”, 1980 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 80CH1602, B.R. McAvoy, Ed., No. 2, pp. 954–956.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. S. Heyman, “Pulsed Phase Locked Loop Strain Monitor”, NASA Patent Disclosure LAR 12772-1, (1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. A. Shoup, J. G. Miller, J. S. Heyman, and W. Illg, “Ultrasonic Characterization of Fatigue and Impact Damage in Graphite Epoxy Composite Laminates”, 1982 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, B. R. McAvoy, Ed., No. 2, pp. 960–964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric I. Madaras
    • 1
  • Clarence C. PoeJr.
  • Walter Illg
    • 1
  • Joseph Heyman
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations