Skip to main content

Cache Site Memory in Birds

  • Chapter
Foraging Behavior

Abstract

Many animals establish scattered caches of food and later recover them. During recovery, they behave like other foraging animals in many ways. They travel between caches, choose which caches to recover, and decide when to stop feeding at a particular cache and move on to search for another. There is, however, one important difference between cache recovery and most other forms of foraging. The caches were originally created by the animal foraging for them. Therefore, the spatial distribution of caches is, at least potentially, fully known to the cache-forager. This chapter examines the evidence that cache locations are remembered. Results from studies of gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis), Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), marsh tits (Parus palustris) and black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) show that the spatial locations of large numbers of widely scattered caches are accurately remembered for several days or weeks, or more. This finding is interesting in itself. In addition, if the memory capabilities found in food-storing birds have any generality, many instances of foraging may be assisted by similar large capacity, long-term memory for spatial locations. As well as for other properties of the distribution of prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balda, R.P. 1980. Recovery of cached seeds by a captive Nucifraga caryotactes. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 52: 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balda, R.P., Kamil, A.C., and Grim. 1986. Revisits to emptied cache sites by nutcrackers. Animal Behaviour, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balda, R.P., and Turek, R. 1984. The cache-recovery system as an example of memory capabilities in Clark’s nutcracker. In: Animal Cognition (ed. by H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever, & H.S. Terrace ), pp. 513–532. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J., Balda, R.P., and Vander Wall, S.B. 1973, Morphology of the sublingual pouch and tongue musculature in Clark’s nutcracker. Auk, 90: 491–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitron, D., and Nuechterlein, G.L. 1985. Experiments on olfactory detection of food caches by black-billed Magpies. The Condor, 87: 92–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, K.G., and Tomback, D.F. 1986. Bolus recovery by gray jays: An experimental analysis. Animal Behaviour, 34: 754–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, R., Krebs, J.R., and Sherry, D.F. 1981. Food storing by marsh tits. Animal Behaviour, 29: 1252–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, D.D. 1965. The role of saliva in food storage by the Gray Jay. Auk, 82: 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, C.L., and Montgomerie, R.D. 1981. Hummingbird foraging behavior: Decision-making and energy regulation. In: Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches (ed. by A.C. Kamil & T.D. Sargent ). Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J. 1960. Populations of tits and goldcrests and their food supply in pine plantations. Ibis, 102: 163–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F.B., and Wolf, L.L. 1977. Nonrandom foraging by sunbirds in a patchy environment. Ecology, 58: 1284–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuntoli, M., and Mewaldt, L. 1978. Stomach contents of Clark’s nutcrackers collected in Western Montana. Auk, 95: 595–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M.A., and Graves, J.A. 1980a. Failure of interocular transfer of learning in pigeons (Columba livia) trained on a jumping stand. Bird Behaviour, 2: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M.A., and Graves J.A. 1980b. The relationship between scanning patterns and monocular discrimination learning in the pigeon. Physiology and Behavior, 25: 39–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M.A., and Graves, J.A. 1982. Retinal locus as a factor in interocular transfer in the pigeon. In: Analysis of Visual Behavior (ed. by D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, & R.J.W. Mansfield ), pp. 211–240. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, J.A., and Goodale, M.A. 1977. Failure of interocular transfer in the pigeon (Columba livia). Physiology and Behavior, 19: 425–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn, S. 1974. Storage of surplus food by the boreal chickadee Parus hudsonicus in Alaska, with some records on the mountain chickadee Parus gambeli in Colorado. Ornis. Scand., 5: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi, H. 1977. Stored nuts (Castanopsis cuspidata) as a food resource of nestling varied tits (Parus varius). Tori, 26: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, W.E., Marsh, R.E., and Cole, R.E. 1968. Food detection by deer mice using olfactory rather than visual cues. Animal Behaviour, 16: 13–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James, P.C., and Verbeek, N.A.M. 1984. Temporal and energetic aspects of food storage in Northwestern crows. Ardea, 72: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, A.C. 1978. Systematic foraging by a nectar-feeding bird, the Amakihi (Loxops virens). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92: 388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, A.C., and Balda, R. 1985. Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifrage columbiana). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11: 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, W.D. 1980. Acorn storage by acorn woodpeckers in an oak woodland: An energetics analysis. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Ecology, Management and Utilization of California Oaks (ed. by T.R. Plumb), pp. 265–269. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Station Technical Report, PWS-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. 1945. Studies of interrelations of central nervous structures in binocular vision. I. The lack of binocular transfer of visual discriminative habits acquired monocularly by the pigeon. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 67: 105–129.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long, C.A. 1976. Evolution of mammalian cheek pouches and a possibly discontinuous origin of a higher taxon (Geomyoidae). American Naturalist, 110: 1093–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, H. 1978. Der Tannenhaher im Engadin. Munstersche Geographische Arbeiten, 3: 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezhenny, A. 1964. Biology of the nutcracker Nucifraga caryocatactes macrorhynchos in South Yakutia. Zool. zhurnal., 43: 167–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie, J.O. 1977. Cues used for cache-finding by agoutis (Dasyprocta punctata). Journal of Mammology, 58: 95–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J.T. 1958. Food habits and behavior of the gray squirrel. Journal of Mammology, 39: 376–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olton, D.S., and Collison, C. 1979. Intramaze cues and “odor trails” fail to direct choice behavior on an elevated maze. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7: 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, O.J. 1981. Factors influencing foraging in desert rodents. In: Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches (ed. by A.C. Kamil, & T.D. Sargent ). Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W. 1979. Spatial memory in the rat on a heirarchical maze. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10: 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, R.J. 1969. A contribution to the biology of the Gray Jay. Canadian Field Naturalist, 83: 300–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D.L., and Moscovitch, M. 1984. Infants, anmesics, and dissociable memory systems. In: Infant Memory (ed. by M. Moscovitch ), pp. 173–216. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter, D. 1981. Does the theory of optimal diets apply in complex environments? American Naturalist, 118: 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. 1980. Use of scatterhoards by eastern chipmunks to replace stolen food. Journal of Mammology, 61: 733–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, D.F. 1982. Food storage, memory and marsh tits. Animal Behaviour, 30: 631–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, D.F. 1984a. Food storage by black-capped chickadees: Memory for the location and contents of caches. Animal Behaviour, 32: 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, D.F. 1984b. What food-storing birds remember. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38: 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, D.F. 1985. Food storage by birds and mammals. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 15: 153–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, D.F., Krebs, J.R., and Cowie, R. 1981. Memory for the location of stored food in marsh tits. Animal Behaviour, 29: 1260–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth, S.J., and Krebs, J.R. 1982. How marsh tits find their hoards: The roles of site preference and spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8: 354–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T.A., and Krebs, J.R. 1986. Retrieval of stored seed by marsh tits in the field. Ibis, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S., Augerinos, G., and Black, A.H. 1980. Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats. Learning and Motivation, 11: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, P. 1951. Food storage, territory and song in the thick-billed nutcracker. Proc. Xth International Ornithological Congress, 10: 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomback, D.F. 1980. How nutcrackers find their seed stores. Condor, 82: 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomback, D.F. 1983. Nutcrackers and pines: Coevolution or coadaptation? In: Coevolution (ed. by M.H. Nitecki ), pp. 179–223. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall, S.B. 1982. An experimental analysis of cache recovery in Clark’s nutcracker. Animal Behaviour, 30: 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall, S.B., and Balda, R. 1977. Coadaptations of the Clark’s nutcracker and the pinon pine for efficient seed harvest and dispersal. Ecological Monographs, 47: 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall, S.B., and Balda, R. 1981. Ecology and evolution of food-storage behavior in conifer-seed-caching corvids. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 56: 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall, S.B., and Hutchins, H.E. 1983. Dependence of Clark’s nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana) on conifer seeds during the postfledgling period. Canadian Field Naturalist, 97: 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Jr., W., and Green, S.L. 1984. Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10: 256–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whillans-Browning, K.V. 1982. The influence of food type on hoarding behavior in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balda, R.P., Bunch, K.G., Kamil, A.C., Sherry, D.F., Tomback, D.F. (1987). Cache Site Memory in Birds. In: Kamil, A.C., Krebs, J.R., Pulliam, H.R. (eds) Foraging Behavior. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1839-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1839-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9027-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1839-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics