Office Automation, Clerical Workers, and Labor Relations in the Insurance Industry

  • Daniel B. Cornfield
  • Polly A. Phipps
  • Diane P. Bates
  • Deborah K. Carter
  • Trudie W. Coker
  • Kathleen E. Kitzmiller
  • Peter B. Wood
Part of the Plenum Studies in Work and Industry book series (SSWI)

Abstract

As “a major white-collar industry which pioneered in the application of office automation”1 in the early 1950s, the insurance industry altered the conditions of office work and the relations between clerical workers and management. A growing disjunction between office clerical workers and management in the insurance industry has accompanied office automation during the post-World War II era. As management automates the office to raise worker productivity and rationalize the clerical labor process2—that is, to formalize, standardize and quantify the control of labor—clerical workers, most of whom are women, increasingly express concern over employment conditions- and sex discrimination. Moreover, women clerical workers are beginning to unionize and affiliate with working women’s organizations, prompting management to introduce a human relations, social psychological managerial philosophy in order to preempt collective action of clerical workers. The disjunction, then, concerns the implementation of office automation, employment conditions and the divergent methods clerical labor and management have developed for management-labor discourse. In a context of occupational sex segregation, the disjunction is occurring simultaneously along class (management and labor) and gender lines.

Keywords

Depression Expense Tated Arena Conglomerate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Impact of Office Automation in the Insurance Industry ,Bulletin no. 1468 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1966), p.iii.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evelyn Glenn and Roslyn Feldberg, “Degraded and Deskilled: The Proletarianization of Clerical Work,” Social Problems 25 (October 1977), pp. 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis Carson, “Women Directors and Officers of Insurance Companies,” Best’s Review ,Property/Casuality ed., 78 (December 1977), p.10.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibicd.; Linda Kocolowski, “Join Ins. Mainstream, Women Told,” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., 4 June 1982, p.56.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carson; William Krupman and Patrick Vaccaro, “Labor Relations for Today’s Insurers,” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., 8 August 1981, p.11Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    Charles Reckley, “How Women Can Be More Successful in Business,” The National Underwriter ,Life/Health ed., 15 August 1981, p. 15.Google Scholar
  7. 5b.
    Terrence Deal and Allan Kennedy, Corporate Cultures (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1982), pp. 119–120.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    C. Wright Mills, White Collar (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956), p.195.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Glenn and Feldberg; Maarten de Kadt, “Insurance: A Clerical Work Factory,” in Case Studies on the Labor Process ,ed. Andrew Zimbalist (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979), pp. 242–256.Google Scholar
  10. 8a.
    David Lockwood, Black-Coated Workers (London: Allen & Unwin, 1958)Google Scholar
  11. 8b.
    Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Joan Woodward, Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (London: Oxford University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    William Corliss, Computers (Washington, DC: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, GPO, 1973).Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    Charles Eames and Ray Eames, A Computer Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. 11a.
    T. J. Anderson and W. R. Trotter, Word Processing (New York: AMACOM Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Ibid., p.18; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Adjustments to the Introduction of Office Automation ,Bulletin no. 1276 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1960).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Ibid., p. 7; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Technological Trends in Major American Industries ,Bulletin no. 1474 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1966), p.249.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Technology and Labor in Five Industries ,Bulletin no. 2033 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1979), pp. 42–44.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    U.S. Bureau of Industrial Economics, 1983 U.S. Industrial Outlook (Washington, DC: GPO, 1983), p. 51–5; “IBM Picked to Install Communications Link by Insurance Institute,” Wall Street Journal October 7, 1982, p.6.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    Richard Smith, “Telecommunications in the 1980’s,” Best’s Review ,Life/Health ed. 82 (September 1981), p.54.Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook ,Bulletin no. 940 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1949).Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook ,Bulletin no. 1215 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1957.Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook ,Bulletin no. 1255 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1959)Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Industry Wage Survey, Life Insurance, December 1971 ,Bulletin no. 1791(Washington, DC: GPO, 1973)Google Scholar
  25. 32.
    Ida Hoos, Automation in the Office (Washington, DC: Public Affairs, 1961)Google Scholar
  26. 32a.
    Diane Werneke, Microelectronics and Office Jobs (Geneva: International Labour Office, 1983)Google Scholar
  27. 32b.
    Joan Greenbaum, In the Name of Efficiency (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    Hoos; Floyd Mann, “Psychological and Organizational Impacts,” in Automation and Technological Change ,ed. John Dunlop (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962), pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    Simon Marcson, ed., Automation, Alienation and Anomie (New York: Harper & Row, 1970).Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    Jon Shepard, Automation and Alienation (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  31. 35a.
    Thomas Whisler, The Impact of Computers on Organizations (New York: Praeger, 1970).Google Scholar
  32. 36.
    Michael Zisman, “Office Automation: Revolution or Evolution?” Sloan Management Review 19 (Spring 1978), p.6.Google Scholar
  33. 36a.
    Elliot Richardson, Work in America (Cambridge: MIT press, 1973).Google Scholar
  34. 36b.
    Graham Staines and Robert Quinn, “American Workers Evaluate the Quality of their Jobs,” Monthly Labor Review 102 (January 1979), pp.3–12.Google Scholar
  35. 36c.
    Paul Andrisani, Work Attitudes and Labor Market Experience (New York: Praeger, 1978).Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Glenn and Feldberg. Also, see Braverman; James Driscoll, “Office Automation: The Dynamics of a Technological Boondoggle,“ paper presented at the International Office Automation Symposium held at Stanford University, 1980; Laird Cummings, ”Workers, Management and Computers,” paper presented at the 27th annual meetings of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, Chicago, 1977.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    John Andrew, “Terminal Tedium,” Wall Street Journal ,May 6, 1983, p.1.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    Charles Tolbert, Patrick Horan and E. M. Beck, “The Structure of Economic Segmentation,” American Journal of Sociology 85 (March 1980), pp. 1095–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39a.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns 1981 ,United States, CBP-81-l(Washington, DC: GPO, 1983).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Greenbaum; Phillip Kraft, Programmers and Managers (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977).Google Scholar
  41. 40a.
    Alan Brill, “The Alienation of the Systems Analyst,” in Highlights of the Literature: Worker Alienation ,ed. Loren Meltzer (Scarsdale, NY: Work in America Institute, 1978), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  42. 40b.
    Donileen Loseke and John Sonquist, “The Computer Worker in the Labor Force,” Sociology of Work and Occupations 6 (May 1979), pp. 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 41.
    Adele Hoffmeyer, “VDT Safety: Is There a Problem?“ Best’s Review; Life/Health ed. 82 (March 1982), pp.66–72.Google Scholar
  44. 41a.
    Roger Hotte, “User Comfort, Safety Now Major Issues in U.S.,” Computer World ,October 26, 1981, p.5.Google Scholar
  45. 41b.
    Working Women, Race Against Time: Automation of the Office (Cleveland: Working Women, 1980).Google Scholar
  46. 42.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Industry Wage Survey, Life Insurance, May-July 1961 ,Bulletin no. 1324 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1962); Industry Wage Survey, Life Insurance, October-November 1966 ,Bulletin no. 1569 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1967); Industry Wage Surveys: Banking and Life Insurance December 1976 ,Bulletin no. 1988 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1978); Bulletin nos. 1791 and 2119.Google Scholar
  47. 44.
    Arthur Sloane and Fred Witney, Labor Relations ,3rd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
  48. 45.
    Harvey Clermont, Organizing the Insurance Worker (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  49. 45a.
    Edward Kokkelenberg and Donna Sockell, “Union Membership in the United States, 1973–1981,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (July 1985), pp. 497–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 47.
    Matthew Goodfellow, “Is Insurance Unionization Inevitable? (Part 2),” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., March 7, 1981, p. 11.Google Scholar
  51. 47a.
    David Armstrong and Christian Nuttal, “Managing the Efficient Automated Workplace,” Best’s Review ,Life/Health ed. 82 (May 1981), p. 48.Google Scholar
  52. 47b.
    Philip Foner, Women and the American Labor Movement: From WWI to the Present (New York: Free Press, 1980), pp. 556–557.Google Scholar
  53. 48.
    Everett Kassalow, ’’White-Collar Unionism in the United States,” in White-Collar Trade Unions ,ed. Adolf Sturmthal (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1966), pp. 355–359.Google Scholar
  54. 48a.
    Charles Coleman and Jane Rose, “Bank Unionization: Status and Prospects,” Monthly Labor Review 98 (October 1975), pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
  55. 49.
    Jean Tepperman, Not Servants, Not Machines (Boston: Beacon Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  56. 49a.
    Linda LeGrande, “Women in Labor Organizations: Their Ranks are Increasing,” Monthly Labor Review 101 (August 1978), pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
  57. 49b.
    Roberta Goldberg, Organizing Women Office Workers (New-York: Praeger, 1983).Google Scholar
  58. 54.
    Doris Fenske, “Another Union Readies a Run at the Insurance Industry” Best’s Review ,Life/Health ed. 81 (October 1980), p. 12.Google Scholar
  59. 54a.
    Goodfellow, “Insurance Unionization (Part 2)” and his articles: “What’s New in Union Organizing Companies?” Best’s Review ,Life/Health ed. 76 (October 1975), p. 10.Google Scholar
  60. 54b.
    John Kilgour, “Unionization: Is the Insurance Industry Vulnerable?” Best’s Review ,Property/Casualty ed. 83 (August 1982), pp. 34–93.Google Scholar
  61. 55.
    Cathy Trost, “Equitable Life Accord with Service Union Marks Breakthrough,” Wall Street Journal ,November 13, 1984, p. 10.Google Scholar
  62. 56.
    Goldberg, pp. 89–108; Tepperman; Louise Howe, Pink Collar Workers (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1977).Google Scholar
  63. 57.
    Foner; Goldberg; Fenske; Steve Cocheo, “Head of Women’s Group Discusses Fledgling Union,” ABA Banking Journal 73 (November 1981), pp. 148–159.Google Scholar
  64. 57a.
    Karen Koziara and Patricia Insley, “Organizations of Working Women Can Pave the Way for Unions,” Monthly Labor Review 105 (June 1982), pp. 53–54.Google Scholar
  65. 58.
    Working Women, p.12; “Health Fears on VDT’s Spur Union Action,” Wall Street Journal ,October 27, 1981, p.31; Andrew.Google Scholar
  66. 59.
    Ivar Berg, Marcia Freedman and Michael Freeman, Managers and Work Reform (New York: Free Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  67. 61.
    Robert Nolan, “Work Management Programs Really Work,” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., February 15, 1980, p. 25.Google Scholar
  68. 61a.
    Harry Wiemann, “Administrative Improvement Program,” Best’s Review ,Property/Casualty ed. 80 (August 1979), pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
  69. 63.
    Frank Santangeli, “Improving Productivity through Job Enrichment,” Best’s Review ,Life/Health ed. 77 (August 1976), pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
  70. 63a.
    Jill Casner-Lotto, “Management Choices Will Be the Key to Success,” World of Work Report 8 (April 1983), p. 25.Google Scholar
  71. 63b.
    Ellen Klimon, “Future is Now for Agency Automation,” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., May 16,1980, p. 55.Google Scholar
  72. 63c.
    Krupman and Vaccaro; Kenneth Miller, “Sagging Productivity Besets Insurance Business,” The National Underwriter ,Property/Casualty ed., February 23, 1980, p.2.Google Scholar
  73. 63d.
    Armstrong and Nuttal; “Lincoln National Life Stresses Work Restructure, Employee Involvement for Greater Quality, Productivity,” World of Work Report 4 (June 1979), p. 41.Google Scholar
  74. 63e.
    Alfred Haggarty, “ ‘Quality Circles’ Approach to Greater Productivity Viewed,” The National Underwriter ,Life/Health ed., October 3, 1981, p.30.Google Scholar
  75. 67.
    U.S. Bureau of Industrial Economics, Industrial Outlook; ‘Insurance Squeeze,’ Wall Street Journal ,September 20, 1983, p.1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel B. Cornfield
    • 1
  • Polly A. Phipps
    • 2
  • Diane P. Bates
    • 1
  • Deborah K. Carter
    • 1
  • Trudie W. Coker
    • 1
  • Kathleen E. Kitzmiller
    • 1
  • Peter B. Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations