Advertisement

Deregulation, Technological Change, and Labor Relations in Telecommunications

  • Dick Batten
  • Sara Schoonmaker
Part of the Plenum Studies in Work and Industry book series (SSWI)

Abstract

Technological change and industry deregulation have promoted the development of cooperative labor relations arrangements in U.S. telecommunications. With the entry of non-union competitors and the continuous adoption of labor-saving technology in the industry, union membership and AT&T’s market share have been jeopardized, compelling labor and management to resolve their divergent interests and address their mutual concerns.

Keywords

Technological Change Labor Relation Federal Communication Commission Union Membership Telecommunication Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Interview with Robert Luckey, Executive Director of Research Communications, Science Division, Bell aboratories,Morristown, NJ, 19 February 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    Frederick R. Feldman, “Avoiding Obsolescence in Telecommunications,”The Office (November 1982), p. 66.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Gerard W. Brock, The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure (Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1981), p. 94.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Paul R. Lawrence and Davis Dyer, Renewing American Industry (New York: The Free Press, 1983),p. 209.Google Scholar
  5. 14.
    Stanley Aronowitz, False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973), pp. 267–268.Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    William H. Melody,“Interconnection: Impact on Competition, Carriers and Regulation,”in U.S. Senate, Hearings Before The Subcommittee on Antitrust And Monopoly of the Committee of the Judiciary, The Industrial Reorganization Act, Part 2: The Communications Industry (Washington, DC: GPO, 30, 31 July; 1, 2 August 1973), pp. 1260–1271Google Scholar
  7. 15a.
    Dan Schiller, Telematics and Government (Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1982), pp. 15–21)Google Scholar
  8. 15b.
    U.S. Federal Communications Committee, “In the Matter of the Use of the Carterphone Device in the Message Toll Telephone Service”, F.C.C. Docket No. 16942, Notice of Inquiry (Washington, DC: GPO, 21 October 1966).Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    U.S. Federal Communications Committee, “In the Matter of Regulatory and Policy Problems presented by the Interdependence of Computers and Communications Services and Facilities,”F.C.C. Docket No. 16979, Notice of Inquiry (Washington, DC: GPO, 10 November 1966).Google Scholar
  10. 19.
    Richard E. Wiley, “The Consumer Communications Reform Act: The F.C.C. Position on the Proposed Legislation,”Telecommunications Policy (March 1977), pp. 109–110.Google Scholar
  11. 24.
    Mike Woody and Dan Grove Tell of TCA Plans and Progress,Telecommunications News,September 1981, pp. 52–57Google Scholar
  12. 28.
    U.S. Federal Communications Commission, Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (Washington, DC: GPO, 1950), p. 22Google Scholar
  13. 28a.
    F.C.C., Statistics of Communications Common Carriers (Washington, DC: GPO, 1982), p. 19.Google Scholar
  14. 32.
    George Kohl, “Changing Competitive and Technology Environments in Telecommunications,”in: Labor and Technology: Union Response to Changing Environments ,eds, Donald Kennedy et al. (Pennsylvania State University: Department of Labor Studies, 1982), pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    Dick Batten et al., What Ever Happened to Job Security: The 1985 Slowdown in Massachusetts Electronics (Watertown, MA: The High Tech Research Group, 1986), p. 54.Google Scholar
  16. 38.
    Oswald Harold Ganley and Gladys D. Ganley, To Inform or to Coittrol?: The New Communications Networks (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982), p. 30Google Scholar
  17. 38a.
    Robert William Haigh and George Gerbner, Communications in the Twenty-first Century (New York: Wiley, 1981), pp. 138–153.Google Scholar
  18. 39.
    Michael Dymmel,“Technology and Labor in Telephone Communications,”U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Technology and Labor in Five Industries ,Bulletin 2033 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1979), pp. 28–40.Google Scholar
  19. 45.
    Jack Barbash, Unions and Telephones: The Story of the Communications Workers of America (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1952), pp. 20–42, 79, 93.Google Scholar
  20. 46.
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Productivity Measures for Selected Industries: 1954–1982 ,Bulletin no. 2189 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1983), p. 7Google Scholar
  21. 50.
    Ronnie J. Straw, Patrick J. Hunt, C.W.A. Strategies for Dealing With New Technology in the Communications Industry (Washington, DC: C.W.A., 28 April 1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dick Batten
    • 1
  • Sara Schoonmaker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations