Looking for Introspection; Self-Consciousness, Self-Awareness, and Emotionality
When science looks back and evaluates the relative importance of a research document, one of the yardsticks used is the amount of research and, occasionally, the manner of controversy that follows the publication. By this definition, Schachter and Singer’s (1962) study must be regarded as a classic in psychology. The paper set a course for the study of the role of cognition in emotion (e.g., Lazarus, 1968; Nowlis, 1970; Valins, 1970) and kindled a dispute that was furthered by Schachter’s (1964) subsequent conclusion that an emotional event1 occurs when an ambiguous state of physiological arousal is combined with an appropriate cognition. Based on this conclusion and a methodology relying on misdirection, misinformation, and deception, a premise was established suggesting that internal states are ambiguous and uninterpretable without appropriate context. Consequently, without context, a feeling could not be matched to an affective label. This theoretical notion implies that introspective awareness is not a viable phenomenon and is the foundation of the ensuing controversy.
KeywordsDepression Covariance Guaran Glean
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bem, D. J. (1970). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Buss, A. H. (1980). Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Kuiken, D., Neuhaus, D., & Bromberg, D. (1982). The effects of private and public self-consciousness on the expression of an emotional experience. Unpublished research document.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Nowlis, V. (1970). Mood: Behavior and experience. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 261–277). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Valins, S. (1970). The perception and labelling of bodily changes as determinants of emotional behavior. In P. Black (Ed.) Physiological correlates of emotion (pp. 229–243). New York: Academic Press,Google Scholar
- Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 233–275). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Zimbardo, P. G., Cohen, A., Weisenberg, M., Dworkin, L., & Firestone, I. (1969). The control of experimental pain. In P. G. Zimbardo (Ed.), The cognitive control of motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965). Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar