Bioelectric Effects of High-Energy, Electrical Discharges

  • Phyllis M. Holt
  • E. G. Boyd
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 78)


Patients with paroxysmal supraventricular or ventricular tachycardias may find drug therapy ineffective or productive of unacceptable side effects. Until recently the therapeutic alternatives in this situation were antitachycardia pacemakers, which are unsuitable for some patients [1, 2], or surgery with its attendant hazards [3, 4]. The recent development of the high-energy, direct current endocardial ablation technique marked the beginning of a new era of the management of drug resistant tachyarrhythmias.


Coronary Sinus Catheter Ablation Accessory Pathway Electric Field Stimulation Test Tank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    German LD, Strauss HC: Electrical termination of tachyarrhythmias by discrete pulses. PACE 7: 514–540, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher JD, Kim SG, Furman S, Matos JA: Role of implantable pacemakers in control of recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 49: 194–206, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sealy WC, Gallagher JJ, Pritchett LC: The surgical anatomy of Kent bundles based on electrophysiological mapping and surgical exploration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 76: 804, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boineau JP, Cox JL: Rationale for a direct surgical approach to control ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 49:381–396, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vedel J, Frank R, Fontaine G, et al: Bloc auriculo-ventriculaire intra-Hisien definitif induit au cours d’une exploration endoventriculaire droite. Arch Mal Coeur 72: 107, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzales R, Scheinman M, Margaretten W, Rubinstein M: Closed-chest electrode-catheter technique for His bundle ablation in dogs. Am J Physiol, (Heart Circ Physiol, 10) 241: H283–H287, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonzales R, Scheinman M, Bharati S, Lev M: Closed chest permanent atrioventricular block in dogs. Am Heart J 105: 461–470, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scheinman MM, Morady F, Hess DS, Gonzales R: Catheter-induced ablation of the atrioventricular junction to control refractory supraventricular arrhythmias. JAMA 248: 851–855, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gallagher JJ, Svenson RH, Kassell JH, German LD, Bardy GH, Broughton A, Critelli G: Catheter technique for closed chest ablation of the atrioventricular conduction system. N Engl J Med 306: 194–200, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisher JD, Brodman R, Kim SG, et al: Attempted non-surgical electrical ablation of accessory pathways via the coronary sinus in the Wolff Parkinson White syndrome. JACC 4: 685–694, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morady F, Scheinman MM: Transvenous catheter ablation of an accessory pathway in a patient with Wolff Parkinson White Syndrome. N Engl J Med 310: 705–707, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ward D, Drysdale M, Redwood D: Interruption of anomalous atrioventricular conduction using a transvenous electrode catheter to deliver shocks in the coronary sinus. (abstract) Br Heart J 51: 686–687, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harzler GO: Electrode catheter ablation of refractory focal ventricular tachycardia. JACC 2: 1107–1113, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonet JL, Fontaine G, Frank R, Grosgogeat Y: Treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardias by endocardial fulguration. Circulation 72: (4): III 388 (abstract.), 1985.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McComb JM, McGovern BA, Garen H, Ruskin JW: Modification of atrioventricular conduction using low energy transcatheter shocks. JACC (abstract) 5: 454, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manz M, Steinbeck G, Luderitz B: His bundel-ablation Eine Methode zur Behandling bedrohlicher supraventrikularer Herzrhthmusstorungen. Ler Internist 24: 95–98, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nathan AW, Ward DE, Bennett DH, Bexton RS Camm AJ: Catheter ablation of atrioventricular conduction. Lancet 1: 1280–1284, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Conde AX, Perez Gomerz F, Harguindey LS: Endocardial ablation. In: Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, Tachyarrhythmias. Perez-Gomez, ed. Madrid. Editorial Group pp. 1545–1558, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abbott JA, Eldar M, Segar JJ, Ruder MA, et al: Noninvasive assessment of myocardial function following attempted catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia foci. Circulation 72, (4): III 388 (abstract), 1985.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bennett DH: from Symposium on Endocardial Ablation British Pacing Group, Royal College of Physicians, London, June 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holt P, Boyd EGCA, Crick JCP, Sowton E: Low energies and Helifix electrodes in the successful ablation of atrioventricular conduction. PACE 8: 639–645, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Polgar P, Bolnar P, Worum F, Bekassy Sz, Kovacs P, Lorinerz I: Closed chest ablation of the His Bundle; a new technique using suction electrode catheter and DC shock. In Cardiac Pacing Steinbach K., ed. Verlag-Darstdat: Dr.D.Steinkopff 883–890, 1983.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Karbenn U, Schwartzmaler J, Rohner D: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 6 (Suppl 1): 19, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morady F, Scheinman M, Winston S, et al: Efficacy and safety of transcatheter ablation of posteroseptal accessory pathways. Circulation 72 (Suppl III): III-389 (abstract), 1985.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    de la Asuncion MA Guillen L, Almeria C, Farinas J, Brandau D, Sanchez Harguindelf L: Low energy endocardial His Bundle ablation method using two intracardiac electrodes. Preliminary results. In: Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, Tachyarrhythmias F. Perez-Gomez, ed. Madrid: Editorial Group pp. 1605–1610, 1985.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boyd EG, Holt P: An investigation into the electrical ablation technique and a method of electrode assessment. PACE 8: 815–824, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bardy GH, Coltorti F, Rackson MM, Hanson K, Greene HL, Ivey TD: Current waveform modulation to avoid plasma-arcing and barotrauma with catheter mediated electrode discharges. Circulation 72 (Suppl III): III 474, 1985.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwan HP: Electrical properties of body tissues and impedance. IRE Trans Med Electronics 3: 32–46, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fricke H: The electric conductivity and capacity of disperse systems. Physics 1: 106–115, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leibman FM, Pearl ME, et al: The electrical conductance of blood in motion. Phys Med Biol 7: 177–194, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyd E, Holt P: Haematological and tissue effects of high energy ablation. Br Heart J 53(1): 99 (abstract), 1985.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rowland E, Foale R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Perelman M, Krikler DM: Intracardiac contrast echoes during transvenous. His bundle ablation. Br Heart J 53: 240–242, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Holt P, Boyd EG: Haematological effects of the high energy endocardial ablation technique. Circulation 73: 1029, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koch-Weser J: Common Poisons. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. Wintrobe, Thorn, Adams, Braunwald, Isselbacher, Petersdorf, eds., 1974.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jones JL, Lepeschkin E, Jones RE, Rush S: Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. Am J Physiol 235(2): H214–H222, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jones JL, Lepeschkin E, Jones R, Rush S: Cellular fibrillation appearing in cultured myocardial cells after application of strong capacitor discharges. Am J Cardiol 39: 273 (abstract), 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jones JL, Lepeschkin E, Rush S, Jones R: Depolarization induced arrhythmias following high intensity electric field stimulation of cultured myocardial cells. Med Instrum 12: 54, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jones JL, Proskauer CC, Pauli WK, Lepeschkin C, Jones RG: Ultrastructural injury to chick myocardial cells in vitro following “Electric Countershock”. Circ Res 46: 387–394, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davis JS, Lie JT, Bentinck DC, Titus JL, Tacker WA, Geddes LA: Cardiac damage due to electric current and energy: Light microscopic and ultrastructural observations of acute and delayed myocardial cellular injuries. Proceedings Cardiac Defibrillation Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Engineering Station Document No. 00147) pp. 27–32, 1975.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Homburger H, Rossner JA, Antoni H: Ultrastructural findings after injury of isolated heart muscle tissue of the guinea pig by direct currents (German) Bietr Ersten Hife Bahandl Unfallen Elektr Strom 7: 140–181, 1976.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anderson HN, Reichenback D, Steinmetz GP Jr, Merendino KA: An evaluation and comparison of effects of alternating and direct current electrical discharges on canine hearts. Ann Surg 160: 251–262, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dahl CF, Gwy GA, Warner ED, Thomas ED: Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock. Effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges. Circulation 50: 956–961, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jones JL, Jones RE: Decreased defibrillator induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. Am J Physiol 247 (Heart Circ Physiol 16): H792–H796, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jones JL, Jones RE: Determination of safety factor for defibrillator waveforms in cultured heart cells. Am J Physiol 242 (Heart Circ Physiol 11): H662–H670, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hoerter JH, Opie LH: Perinatal changes in glycolytic function in response to hypoxia in the incubated or perfused rat heart. Biol Neonate 33: 144–161, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Holt PM, Boyd EG: Endocardial ablation: The background to its use in ventricular tachycardia. Br Heart J 51: 687 (abstract), 1984.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Henthorn RW, Cohen MD, Anderson PG, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, Olshansky B, Waldo AL: Pathological and clinical observations after catheter fulguration in man. JACC 7(2): 236A, 1986.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee NI, Notargiacoma A, Fletcher RD, Rodriguerz ER, Ferrans VJ, Chen Y-W: The thermal response of ventricular endocardium to laser and electrical ablation and the disparate effects of different suferfusion media. JACC 7(2): 37A, 1986.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Colles MJ: Lasers in medicine. Physics Bull 35: 430–432, 1984.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee G, Ikeda RM, Theis JH, Chan MC, Stobbe D, Ogata C, Kumagai A: Acute and chronic complications of laser angioplasty: Vascular wall damage and formation of aneurysms in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Am J Cardiol 53: 290–293, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Svenson RH, Gallagher JJ, Selle JG, Sealy WC, Zimmern SH, Fedor JM, Marroum MC, Tatis GP, Seifert KT, Robicsek MD: Successful intraoperative Nd: YAG laser ablation of ventricular tachycardia. JACC 7(2): 237A, 1986.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ward DE, Davis M: Transvenous high energy shock for ablating atrioventricular conduction in man. Observations on the histological effects. Br Heart J 51: 175–178, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wehner HD, Sellier K: Compound action potentials in the peripheral nerve induced by shock waves. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 508: 179–184, 1982.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cooper GJ, Maynard RC, Pearse BP, Stainer MC, Taylor DE: Cardiovascular distortion in experimental nonpenetrating chest impacts. J Trauma 24(3): 188–200, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cooper GJ, Pearse BP, Strainer MC, et al: The biomechanical response of the chest wall to impact with particular reference to cardiac injuries. J Trauma 22: 994–1008, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kadish AH, Spear JF, Prood C, Levine JH, Moore GN: Intercatheter energy delivery for ablation of ventricular myocardium. JACC 7(2): 237A, 1986.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brodman R, Fisher JD: Evaluation of a catheter technique for ablation of accessory pathways near the coronary sinus using a canine model. Circulation 67(4): 923–929, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Geddes LA, Niebauer MJ, Babbs CF, Bourland JD: Fundamental criteria underlying the efficiency and safety of defibrillating current waveforms. Med & Biol Engng & Computing 23: 122–130, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jones JL, Jones RE: Post shock arrhythmias — a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation. Critical Care Medicine 8(3): 167–171, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jones JL, Jones RE: Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms. Am J Physiol 247 (Heart Circ Physiol 16): H729–H796, 1984.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jones JL, Jones RE: Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. Am J Physiol 245 (Heart Circ Physiol 14): H60–H65, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bardy GH, Coltonti F, Rackson M, Hanson K, Greene HL, Ivey TD: Catheter mediated electrical ablation: The relation between current and pulse width on voltage breakdown and shock wave generation. JACC 7(2): 99A, 1986.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bardy GH, Coltonti F, Rackson M, Hanson K, Greene L, Ivey TD: Multiple vs single pulses to avoid voltage breakdown and shock-wave generation with catheter mediated electrical pulses. JACC 7(2): 242A, 1986.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Boyd EG, Holt PM, Sowton E: A modified energy delivery system for lower energy ablation. Br Heart J 7: 651, 1985.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tacker WA, Jr, Geddes LA: Electrical Defibrillation. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc 1980.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    O’Dowd WJ: Defibrillator design and development — a review. J Med Eng & Tech 7(1): 5–15, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Higgins S: Defibrillation: What you should know. Redmond, WA: Physio-Control Corp., 1978.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kugelberg JE: Ventricular defibrillation with double square pulse. Med Biol Eng 6: 167–169, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schuder JC, Rahmoeller GA, Stoeckle H: Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation with triangular and trapezoidal waveforms. Circ Res 19: 689–694, 1966.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    McFarland J, Milnor W, Geddes LA, et al: Ventricular defibrillation in the dogs using single half-wave sinusoidal current pulses of various durations. Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull 7: 151–157, 1969.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Schuder JC, Rahmoeller GA, Nellis SH, et al: Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation with very high amplitude rectangular pulses. J Gen Physiol 22: 1110–1114, 1967.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lown B, Neuman J, Amarasingham R, Berkovits BV: Comparison of alternating current with direct current electroshock across the chest. Am J Cardiol 10: 223, 1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Association for the advancement of medical instrumentation. Cardiac defibrillator devices. ANSI. Arlington, VA: AAMI, 1981.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    International Electrotechnical Commission. Particular requirements for safety of cardiac defibrillators and cardiac defibrillator-monitors. IEC 601; Part 2.4 Geneva: IEC, 1983.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kerber R, Hoyt R: Human transthoracic resistance in emergency defibrillation: Range and relationships to body weight. Circulation 57 (Suppl II): 204, 1978.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Riethorst J: Portable defibrillators: A comparative evaluation. MFI-TEST 83.366 Adviescentrum Medische Technologie, Institute of Medical Physics TNO, PO Box 5011, 3502 JA Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1983.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bouvrain PY, Saumont R, Berthier Y: Etude clinique de la fibrillation ventriculaire, resultat des chocs electrique transthoraciques. Ext Arch Mal Coeur2: 213, 1967.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Tacker WA, Geddes LA, Hoff HE: Defibrillation without A-V block using capacitor discharge with added inductance. Circ Res 22: 633–638, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fisher JD, Brodman R, Johnston DR, Waspe LE, Kim SG Matos JA, Scavin G: Nonsurgical electrical ablation of tachycardias: Importance of prior in vitro testing of catheter leads. PACE 7: 74–81, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phyllis M. Holt
  • E. G. Boyd

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations