Can Machine Learning Offer Anything to Expert Systems?

  • Bruce G. Buchanan
Part of the Machine Learning book series (SECS, volume 92)


Today’s expert systems have no ability to learn from experience. This commonly heard criticism, unfortunately, is largely true. Except for simple classification systems, expert systems do not employ a learning component to construct parts of their knowledge bases from libraries of previously solved cases. And none that I know of couples learning into closedloop modification based on experience, although the SOAR architecture [Rosenbloom and Newell 1985] comes the closest to being the sort of integrated system needed for continuous learning. Learning capabilities are needed for intelligent systems that can remain useful in the face of changing environments or changing standards of expertise. Why are the learning methods we know how to implement not being used to build or maintain expert systems in the commercial world?


Expert System Knowledge Acquisition Inductive Learning Machine Learning Community Commercial World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, J.S. 1985. ROGET: A knowledge-based system for acquiring the conceptual structure of a diagnostic expert system. J. Automated Reasoning 1, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, R. 1982. TEIRESIAS: Applications of meta-level knowledge. In R. Davis and D. Lenat (Eds.). 1982. Knowledge-based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Marcus, S. and McDermott, J. 1989. SALT: A knowledge acquisition language for propose-and-revise systems. Artificial Intelligence 39, 1–37.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McCarthy, J. 1968. Programs with common sense. Proc. Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Processes. Reprinted in M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Mitchell, T.M., Keller, R., and Kedar-Cabelli, S. 1986. Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning 1, 47–80.Google Scholar
  6. Quinlan, J.R., Compton, P.J., Horn, K.A., and Lazarus, L. 1986. Inductive knowledge acquisiton: A case study. Proceedings Second Australian Conference on Applications of Expen Systems. In J.R Quinlan (Ed.), Applications of Expert Systems. Maidenhead: Academic Press (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Rosenbloom, P.S., and Newell, A. 1985. The chunking of goal hierarchies: A generalized model of practice. In R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, and T. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An anificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, RG., Winston, H., Mitchell, T., and Buchanan, B.G. 1985. Representation and use of explicit justification for knowledge base refinement. In Proceedings of IJCAI85. Los Altos, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce G. Buchanan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations