Cognition and Watching Television

  • John J. Burns
  • Daniel R. Anderson
Part of the Foundations of Neuropsychology book series (FNPS, volume 3)

Abstract

Television viewing has been popularly hypothesized to shorten attention spans, increase frantic behavior, and cause brain damage. A review of the scientific literature reveals no support for these claims. In fact, contrary to popular conceptions, it appears that television viewing is a cognitively active behavior, sharing many characteristics of other leisure-time activities such as reading. Although there is some evidence of subtle cognitive effects, such findings require further study to verify the link and the direction of causality. In the same vein, though different patterns of EEG have been reported when comparing television viewing with other activities, these findings indicate only that television viewing differs in some respects from other activities. Like the research on cognitive effects, nothing in this research supports the commonly hypothesized devastating effects of television viewing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D. (1987). Analysis of lengths of TV viewing sessions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Consumer Research, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Alwitt, L., Lorch, E. & Levin, S. (1979). Watching children watch television. In G. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 331–361). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., Choi, H., & Lorch, E. (1987). Attentional inertia reduces distractibility during young children’s television viewing. Child Development 58, 798–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D., & Collins, P. (1988). The impact on children’s education: Television’s influence on cognitive development. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, D., & Field, D. (In press). Online and offline assessment of the television audience. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, D., Levin, S., & Lorch, E. (1977). The effects of TV program pacing on the behavior of preschool children. AV Communication Review 25, 159–166.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, D., & Lorch, E. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction?. In J. Bryant & D. Anderson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 1–34). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, D., Lorch, E., Field, D., Collins, P., & Nathan, J. (1986). Television viewing at home: Age trends in visual attention and time with television. Child Development 57, 1024–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson, D., Lorch, E., Field, D., & Sanders, J. (1981a). The effects of TV program compre- hensibility on preschool children’s visual attention to television. Child Development 52, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anderson, D., Lorch, E., Smith, R., Bradford, R., & Levin, S. (1981b). Effects of peer presence on preschool children’s television viewing behavior. Developmental Psychology 17, 446–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson, D., & McGuire, T. (1978). The effect of TV viewing on the educational performance of elementary school children. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 24, 156–163.Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, D., & Smith, R. (1984). Young children’s TV viewing: The problem of cognitive continuity. In F. Morrison, C. Lord, & D. Keating (Eds.), Advances in applied developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 115–163). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Appel, V., Weinstein, S., & Weinstein, C. (1979). Brain activity and recall of TV. Journal of Advertising Research 19, 7–15.Google Scholar
  14. Bryant, J., Alexander, A., & Brown, D. (1983). Learning from educational television programs. In M. J. Howe (Ed), Learning from television: Psychological and educational research (pp. 1–30). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burns, J. (1988). The relationship between attentional inertia and recognition memory. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  16. Choi, H. (1988). Attentional patterns in five year olds’ toy play: Test of attentional inertia in toy play. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, W. (1982). Cognitive processing aspects of television viewing. In D. Pearl & L. Bouthilet (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2, pp. 9–23). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Kubey, R. (1982). Television and the rest of life: A systematic comparison of subjective experience. In D. Whitney & E. Wartella (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 317–328). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Emery, F., & Emery, M. (1974). A choice of futures: To enlighten or inform. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  20. Emery, F., & Emery, M. (1976). A choice of futures. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.Google Scholar
  21. Featherman, G., Frieser, D., Greenspun, D., Harris, B., Schulman, D., & Crown, P. (1979). Electroencephalographs and electrooculographic correlates of television viewing. Final Technical Report: National Science Foundation Student-Oriented Studies (Grant No. SPI78–03698). Hampshire College: Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Field, D., & Anderson, D. (1985). Instruction and modality effects on children’s television attention and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gadberry, S. (1980). Effects of restricting first graders’ TV viewing on leisure time use, IQ change, and cognitive style. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grieve, R., & Williamson, K. (1977). Aspects of auditory and visual attention to narrative material in normal and mentally handicapped children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 18, 251–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halpern, W. (1975). Turned-on toddlers. Journal of Communication 25, 66–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krugman, H. (1971). Brain wave measures of media involvement. Journal of Advertising Research 11, 3–9.Google Scholar
  28. Krugman, H. (1977). Memory without recall, exposure without perception. Journal of Advertising Research 17, 7–12.Google Scholar
  29. Lorch, E., Anderson, D., & Levin, S. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children’s comprehension of television. Child Development 50, 722–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorch, E., & Castle, V. (1986). Preschool children’s attention to television: Visual attention and probe response times. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  31. Lorch, E., Milich, R., Welsh, R., Yocum, M., Bluhm, C, & Klein, M. (1987). A comparison of the television viewing and comprehension of attention deficit disorders and normal boys. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  32. Mander, J. (1978). Four arguments for the elimination of television. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  33. Meadowcroft, J., & Reeves, B. (1985). The development of schema-based strategies for attending to television stories. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Denver.Google Scholar
  34. Moody, K. (1980). Growing up on television: The TV effect. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, M., & Gross, L. (1982). Television and educational achievement and aspiration. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior (Vol. 2): Technical reviews (pp. 78–90). Washington D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  36. Mulholland, T. (1968). Feedback electroencephalography. Activitas Nervosa Superior (Prague), 10, 410–438.Google Scholar
  37. Mulholland, T. (1974). Training visual attention. Academic Therapy 10, 5–17.Google Scholar
  38. Pearl, D., Bouthilet, L., & Lazar, J. (1982). Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties. Washington D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  39. Radlick, M.S. (1980). The processing demands of television: Neurophysiological correlates of television viewing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  40. Reeves, B., Thorson, E., Rothschild, M., McDonald, D., Hirsch, J., & Goldstein, M. (1985). Attention to television: Intrastimulus effects of movement and scene change on alpha variations over time. International fournal of Neuro science 27, 241–255.Google Scholar
  41. Rothschild, M., Thorson, E., Reeves, B., Hirsch, J., & Goldstein, R. (1986a). EEG activity and the processing of television commercials. Communication and scene change on alpha variations over time. International fournal of Neuro science 27, 241–255.Google Scholar
  42. Rothschild, M., Thorson, E., Reeves, B., Hirsch, J., & Goldstein, R. (1986b). EEG activity and the processing of television commercials. Communication Research 13, 182–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Schafer, E. (1978). Brain responses while viewing television reflect program interest. International fournal of Neuroscience 8, 71–77.Google Scholar
  45. Schorr, L. (1983). Environmental deterrents: Poverty, affluence, violence and television. In M. Levine, W. Carey, A. Crocker, & R. Gross (Eds.), Developmental-behavioral pediatrics (pp. 293–312). Boston: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  46. Shagass, C, Overton, D., Bartolucci, G., & Straumanis, J. (1971). Effect of attention modification by television viewing on somatosensory evoked responses and recovery functions,fournal of Nervous and Mental Disease 152, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, R., Anderson, D., & Fischer, C. (1985). Young children’s comprehension of montage. Child Development 56, 962–971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swerdlow, J. (1981). What is television doing to real people?. Today’s Education 70, 50–57.Google Scholar
  49. Walker, J. (1980). Changes in EEG rhythms during television viewing: Preliminary comparisons with reading and other tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills 51, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, T. (1986). The impact of television: A natural experiment in three communities. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Winn, M. (1985). The plug-in-drug. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  52. Winn, M. (1987). Unplugging the plug-in-drug. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. Burns
  • Daniel R. Anderson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations