Abstract
This chapter is written with a perspective of 20 years of clinical trials in the study of epilepsy and anticonvulsant drugs. At the beginning of this period, no new anticonvulsant drug had been entered into therapeutic use in the United States for approximately eight years. Epileptic seizures were not then categorized with great accuracy and, as described by Coats worth [1], there had been few adequate clinical trials even for those drugs in common use as antiepileptic agents. Only few clinical trials included electroencephalography (EEG) as an aid to seizure identification, and no objective measurements of seizure frequency were available. During the past 20 years, certain principles have been developed for clinical evaluation of antiepileptic drugs and certain protocol formats have proven reliable in the evaluation of anticonvulsant drugs against specific seizure types. Guidelines for the evaluation of antiepileptic drugs have been formulated [2, 3]. Modern trials require admission criteria; exclusion criteria; careful preplanning of trial duration, study design, and methods of assignment randomly to a study group and a control group; the use of a test drug and a placebo; a fixed dosage schedule; and a double-blind methodology designed for the control of bias.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coatsworth JJ (1971). Studies in the Clinical Efficacy of Marketed Antiepileptic Drugs. NINCDS Monograph No. 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Penry JK (1973). Principles for testing of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 14:451–458.
Commission on Antiepileptic Drugs, International League Against Epilespy (in press). Guidelines for clinical evaluation of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia.
Dreifuss FE (1974). Comparison of various observational modes including telemetered EEG in estimating absence seizure frequency and relationship of blood levels to clinical control. Clin EEG 5:180–185.
Dreifuss FE (1977). The pharmacology of the newer antiepileptic drugs and perspectives for the future. In Meinardi H (ed.), Advances in Epileptology. Amsterdam: Swets Publishing Co., pp. 23–238.
Lebacqz K (1980). Controlled clinical trials: some ethical issues. Controlled Clin Trials 1: 29–36.
Probstfield JL, Russell ML, Silvers A, et al. (1984). Clinical trials methods and the practice of medicine. Controlled Clin Trials 5:321–327.
Mullins SM, Warwick S, Akers M, et al. (1984). An acute intervention trial: the research nurse coordinator’s role. Controlled Clin Trials 5:141–156.
Hawkins BS (1984). Evaluating the benefits of clinical trials to future patients. Controlled Clin Trials 5:13–32.
Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Delgado-Escueta AV, et al. (1983). A design for the prospective evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of antiepileptic drugs in adults. Neurology 33 (Suppl l):14–25.
Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Collins JF, et al. (1985). Comparison of carbamazepine, phénobarbital, phenytoin and primidone in partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. N Engl J Med 313:141–151.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dreifuss, F.E., Santilli, N. (1990). Perspective of the Participating Investigator. In: Porter, R.J., Schoenberg, B.S. (eds) Controlled Clinical Trials in Neurological Disease. Foundations of Neurology, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1495-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1495-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8804-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1495-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive