Surveillance after Colorectal Tumor Excision

  • Gabriel A. Kune
Part of the Developments in Oncology book series (DION, volume 78)


The role of regular surveillance of individuals who have had adenomas excised or have had potentially curative surgical resections of a colorectal cancer will be discussed in this chapter. It is known that these two groups are at an increased risk of developing metachronous tumors.


Colorectal Cancer Curative Resection Colorectal Adenoma Colonoscopic Surveillance Total Colonoscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326:658–662, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Averbach AM, Sugarbaker PH. Use of tumor markers and radiologic tests in follow-up. In: Cancer of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. AM Cohen, SJ Winawer, MA Friedman, LL Gunderson (eds), New York: McGraw Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Axon ATR, Boyle P, Riddell RH, et al. Summary of a working party on the surveillance of premalignant lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 89:S160–168, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantyne GH, Modlin IM. Editorial: Postoperative follow-up for colorectal cancer: Who are we kidding? J Clin Gastroenterol 10:359–364, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Brahme F, Ekelung GR, Norden JG, et al. Metachronous colorectal polyps: comparison of development of colorectal polyps and carcinoma in persons with and without histories of polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 17:166–171, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Girodet J, Salmon RJ, Asselain B. Depistage coloscopique des polypes chez les sujets opérés d’un cancer colo-rectal. Etude prospective. Presse Med 14:1819–1821, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gloeckler-Ries LA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (eds). Cancer Statistics Review 1973–1987. Bethesda: Department of Health and Human Services (NiH). Publication No. 90–2789, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman S, Milos ML, Tekawa IS, et al. Colonoscopic screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon cancer: II Past history of colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology 96:299–306, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall C, Griffin J, Dykes PW, et al. Hemoccult does not reduce the need for colonoscopy in surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Gut 34:227–229, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1769–1772, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahn H, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, et al. Can Hemoccult II replace colonoscopy in surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer and after polypectomy? Dis Colon Rectum 35:253–256, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen adenoma follow-up study. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:686–692, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen adenoma follow-up study. Characteristics of patients and initial adenomas in relation to severe dysplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:239–243, 1993a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen adenoma follow-up study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:869–874, 1993b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juhl G, Larson GM, Mullins R, et al. Six-year results of annual colonoscopy after resection of colorectal cancer. World J Surg 14:255–261, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly CJ, Daly JM. Colorectal cancer. Principles of postoperative follow-up. Cancer 70:1397–1408, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kristal AR, Baker MS, Flaherty MJ, et al. A pilot study of DNA aneuploidy in colorectal adenomas and risk of adenoma recurrence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:347–352, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kronborg O. Optimal follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: What tests and how often? Sem Surg Oncol 10:217–224, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Deichgraeber E. Colonoscopy after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. A ten-year prospective investigation of 309 patients. Ugeskr Laeger 153:503–506, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Deichgraeber E, et al. Follow up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: design of a randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol 149 (Suppl):159–162, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kronborg O, Hage E, Adamsen S, et al. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. I. A comparison of the effectiveness of repeated examinations of the colon every 6 and 24 months after removal of stalked polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 18:1089–1093, 1983a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kronborg O, Hage E, Adamsen S, et al. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. II. Repeated examinations of the colon every 6 months after removal of sessile adenomas and adenomas with the highest degree of dysplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 18:1095–1099, 1983b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. History of colorectal polypectomy and risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 74:1064–1065, 1987b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malcolm AW, Perencevich NP, Olson RM, et al. Analysis of recurrence patterns following curative resections for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:131–136, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin EW, Minton JP, Carey LC. CEA-directed second-look surgery in the asymptomatic patient after primary resection of colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 202:310–317, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLeish JA, Giles GG, Thursfield V. Investigation, follow-up and recurrence after resection of colorectal cancer. Aust NZ J Surg 62:931–940, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meagher AP. Stuart M. Does colonoscopic polypectomy reduce the incidence of colorectal carcinoma? Aust NZ J Surg 64:400–404, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minton JP, Hoehn JL, Gerber DM, et al. Results of a 400-patient carcinoembryonic antigen second-look colorectal cancer study. Cancer 55:1284–1290, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Minton J, Martin E. The use of serial CEA determinations to predict recurrence of colon cancer and when to do a second-look operation. Cancer 42:1422–1427, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müller AD, Sonnenberg A. Endoscopic procedures reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 108:A512, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, Ahsan H, et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 108:402–408, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Northover JMA. Carcinoembryonic antigen and recurrent colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 72:544–545, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98:371–379, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Olsen HW, Lawrence WA, Snook CW, et al. Review of recurrent polyps and cancer in 500 patients with initial colonoscopy for polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 31:222–227, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsen HW, Lawrence WA. Demonstration of remarkable reduction in “de novo” colon cancer in colonoscopy follow-up. Gastroenterology 108:A520, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ovaska JT, Järvinen HJ, Mecklin JP. The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:416–422, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patchett SE, Mulcahy HE, O’Donogue DP. Colonoscopic surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 80:1330–1332, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M, et al. Small rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1121–1125, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prager ED, Swinton NW, Young JL, et al. Follow-up study of patients with benign muscosal polyps discovered by prostosigmoidoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 17:322–324, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Provenzale D, Garrett JW, Condon SE, et al. Risk for colon adenomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps. Ann Intern Med 113:760–763, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ransohoff DF, Lang CA, Kuo S. Colonoscopic surveillance after polypectomy: considerations of cost effectiveness. Ann Int Med 114:177–182, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Spencer RJ, Melton LJ III, Ready RL, et al. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 59:305–310, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009–1013, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vassilopoulos PP, Yoon JM, Ledesma EJ, et al. Treatment of recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum at the anastomotic site. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:777–780, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wangensteen OH, Lewis FJ, Tongen LA. The second-look in cancer surgery. Lancet 1:303–307, 1951.Google Scholar
  46. Wanebo HJ, Llaneras M, Martin T, et al. Prospective monitoring trial for carcinoma of colon and rectum after surgical resection. Surg Gynec Obstet 169:479–487, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 135:505–511, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams CB, Macrae FA. The St. Mark’s Neoplastic Polyp Follow-up Study. Front Gastrointest Res 10:226–242, 1992.Google Scholar
  49. Winawer SJ. Surveillance of patients with polyps. In: Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. AM Cohen, SJ Winawer, MA Friedman, LL Gunderson (eds), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995, pp 351–357.Google Scholar
  50. Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Waye JD, et al. Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Bull WHO 68:789–795, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981, 1993a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 328:901–906, 1993b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. The National Polyp Study: design, methods and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. Cancer 70:1236–1245, 1992 (Suppl).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zarchy TM, Ershoff D. Do characteristics of adenomas on flexible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 106:1501–1504, 1944.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel A. Kune
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Colorectal Cancer StudyAustralia

Personalised recommendations