Abstract
Enormous progress has been made in the understanding of colorectal cancer etiology since this authoritative pronouncement by Professor Willis 45 years ago, yet large gaps in our understanding still remain. The early lead that there is an inherited susceptibility in colorectal neoplasia came from studies of familial polyposis syndromes and later from studies of family cancer syndromes. In the past decade, knowledge of the inherited susceptibility to colorectal neoplasia has moved forward enormously with research in molecular genetics. The early clues that environmental factors are also important in colorectal neoplasia came from several sources, namely from noting the enormous geographic variation in the incidence of colorectal cancer, from migrant studies showing striking changes in the incidence of colorectal cancer with migration, and from some religious and cultural groups showing differences in colorectal cancer incidence in relation to the population in which they live. The various hypotheses of inherited and environmental exposures were being tested in humans by several groups of cancer epidemiologists around the world using a variety of methodologies, as well as by laboratory scientists using experimental models of colorectal cancer. At the same time, the mechanisms of colorectal tumor formation were being examined by many groups in carcinogenesis research, and more recently by molecular genetic studies also.
In most cases of intestinal carcinoma, no previous lesions or causative factors are recognizable. In a small proportion of cases, the disease supervenes on polypi or inflammatory lesions.
Rupert Willis MD, 1950 Professor of Pathology University of Leeds
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chow WH, Devesa SS, Blot WJ. Colon cancer incidence: recent trends in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2:419–425, 1991.
Folsom AR, Kaye SA, Potter JD et al. Association of incidence of carcinoma of the endometrium with body weight and fat distribution in older women: early findings of the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer Res 49:6828–6831, 1989.
Kune GA, Kune S. New design to examine colorectal cause and survival. The Melbourne colorectal cancer study. Dig Surg 4:156–159, 1987.
Kune GA, Kune S. The Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study. A Description of the Investigation. University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, ISBN 0 86839 596 X, 1986.
Kune S, Kune GA, Watson LF. The Melbourne colorectal cancer study: incidence findings by age, sex, site, migrants and religion. Int J Epidemiol 15:483–493, 1986.
McMichael AJ, Giles GG. Colorectal cancer. In: Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Cancer Surveys 19:77–98, 1994.
Percy C, Staneck E, Gloeckler L. Accuracy of death certificates and its effects on mortality statistics. Am J Pub Health 71:242–250, 1981.
Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, et al. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med 328:1450–1456, 1993.
Wille« WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 316:1174–1180, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kune, G.A. (1996). Causes of Colorectal Neoplasia a Model of Cancer Etiology. In: Causes and Control of Colorectal Cancer. Developments in Oncology, vol 78. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1273-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1273-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8543-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1273-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive