Skip to main content

An interactive program for machine grouping and layout

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Manufacturing Systems Engineering Series ((MSES,volume 1))

Abstract

A number of companies have reaped the benefits offered by cellular manufacturing systems (CMSs) (Wemmerlov and Hyer, 1986). Typical benefits include: set-up time reduction, improved machine utilization, an increase in production rate and employee morale, a decrease in labor costs and traffic congestion and better control of the manufacturing system. Cellular manufacturing (CM) involves grouping of machines based on the parts they manufacture. The grouping of machines and parts in a CMS is briefly explained here by considering a simple example. Figure 9.1 shows four part routings. The first row indicates that part 1 is routed through machines A, C and E in succession. Figure 9.2 shows the arrangement of the machines referred to in Fig. 9.1 in a job shop environment. Figure 9.3 shows the arrangement of the same machines in ‘cells’. Notice that each cell is dedicated to production of a set of parts. The main idea behind grouping ‘like’ machines into cells is to minimize intercellular part movement. After grouping is done, the next logical step is to develop a layout for the cells and machines within each cell so that both intercellular and intracellular material handling cost is minimized. This step, however, is often ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Askin, R.G. and Chiu, K.S., (1990) A graph partitioning procedure for machine assignment and cell formation in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 28,(8), 1555–72.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ballakur, A. and Steudel, H.J. (1987) Within-cell utilization based heuristic for designing cellular manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 25 (5), 639–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boe, W.J. and Cheng, C.H. (1991) A close neighbor algorithm for designing cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 29, (10) 2097–16.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J.L. (1963) Production flow analysis. The Production Engineer, 42 (12), 742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, J.L. (1977) A manual method of production flow analysis. The Production Engineer, 56, (10) 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G.A. and Grossberg, S. [1788] ART of adaptive pattern recognition by self-organizing neural network. Computer 21, (3) 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H.M. and Milner, D.A. (1982) Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 1(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, M.P. and Rajagopalan, R. (1986) An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 24(2), 451–64.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, M.P. and Rajagopalan, R. (1987) ZODIAC-an algorithm for concurrent formation of part-families and machine cells. International Journal of Production Research, 25(6), 835–50.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, C. and De Witte, J. (1978) Production flow synthesis. CIRP Annalen, 27, 389–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, C, Van Gerwen, R. and De Witte, J. (1976) Analysis of engineering production systems as a base for production-oriented reconstruction. CIRP Annalen, 25, 439–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, J. (1980) The use of similarity coefficients in production flow analysis International Journal of Production Research, 18(4) 503–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. (1992) Recent models and techniques for the layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 57(2), 136–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. (1994) Group technology and cellular manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-24(2) 203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. and Alfa, A.S. (1990) A simulated annealing based approach to solve the facility layout problem, in Proceedings of Fourth Advanced Technology Conference, Washington DC, November 5–7, 489–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. and Alfa, A.S. (1992) Experimental analysis of simulated annealing based algorithm for the layout problem European Journal of Operational Research, 57(2), 190–202.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. and Gupta, Y.P. (1994) A heuristic for designing cellular manufacturing facilities. International Journal of Production Research, 32(1), 125–40.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heragu, S.S. and Kakuturi, S.R. (1992) Grouping and placement of machine cells. DSES Technical Report 37–92–341, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iri, M. (1968) On the synthesis of loop and cutset matrices and related problems. RAAG Memoirs, 4(A-XII), 376–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaparthi, S. and Suresh, N.C (1992) Machine component cell formation in group technology — a neural network approach, International Journal of Production Research, 30(6), 1353–68.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • King, J.R. (1980) Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 18(2), 213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J.R. and Nakornchai, V. (1982) Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension. International Journal of Production Research, 20(2), 117–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A. and Chow, W.S. (1987) An efficient cluster identification algorith, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17(4), 696–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logendran, R. (1990) A workload based model for minimizing total intercell and intracell moves in cellular manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 28(5), 913–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J., (1972) Machine grouping for efficient production, The Production Engineer, 51(2), 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, W.T., Schweitzer, P.J. and White, T.E. (1972) Problem decomposition and data reorganization by a clustering technique. Operations Research, 20, 993–1009.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muther, R. (1973) Systematic Layout Planning, Cahners Books, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, R., Harhalakis, G. and Proth, J. (1990) Multiple routings and capacity considerations in group technology applications. International Journal of Production Research, 28(12), 2243–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan, R. and Barra, J.L. (1975) Design of cellular production systems — a graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 13(6), 567–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, D., Singh, N. and Aneja, Y.P. (1992) A model for cell formation in manufacturing systems with sequence dependence. International Journal of Production Research, 30(6), 1227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifoddini, H. and Wolfe, P.M. (1986) Application of the similarity coefficient method in group technology. HE Transactions, 22(1), 271–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, G. and Narendran, T.T. (1991) GRAPHICS — a nonhierarchical clustering algorithm for group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 29(3), 463–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, G., Narendran, T.T. and Mahadevan, B. (1990) An assignment model for the part-families problem in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 28(1), 145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, S. and Black, J.T., (1990) Cellular manufacturing systems modeling: the petri net approach. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 9(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakharia, A.J. and Wemmerlov, U. (1990) Designing a cellular manufacturing system: a materials flow based operations sequence. HE Transactions, 22(1), 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, T., Chen, D., Chang, J.C. and Chen, H. (1990) A network approach to cell formation in cellular manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 28(11), 2075–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wemmerlov, U. and Hyer, N.L. (1986) Procedures for the part family/machine group identification problem in cellular manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 6(2), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heragu, S.S., Kakuturi, S.R. (1997). An interactive program for machine grouping and layout. In: Parsaei, H.R., Kolli, S., Hanley, T.R. (eds) Manufacturing Decision Support Systems. Manufacturing Systems Engineering Series, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1189-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1189-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8505-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1189-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics