Advertisement

Floral Biology pp 112-139 | Cite as

Floral Longevity: Fitness Consequences and Resource Costs

  • Tia-Lynn Ashman
  • Daniel J. Schoen

Abstract

Floral longevity (the period of time from anthesis to floral senescence) plays an important role in the reproductive ecology of plants. As noted by Primack (1985), the length of time a flower is open can influence its total number of pollinator visits, which, in turn, can affect the amount and diversity of pollen a flower receives, and the amount of pollen it disseminates. Additionally, floral longevity contributes to determining the number of flowers open at any given time (floral display size), the duration of floral display, and the total number of flowers per plant. Ultimately, floral longevity influences many factors that determine the quantity and quality of progeny a plant produces. Over the period of time that a flower functions and contributes to plant fitness, it receives resources to remain alive and attractive to pollinators. Such floral maintenance expenditures may compete with future flower production or other plant functions if plant resources are limited. From an adaptive perspective, therefore, the plant’s floral longevity should reflect the balance between fitness consequences and maintenance costs.

Keywords

Maintenance Cost Construction Cost Fitness Consequence Resource Cost Nectar Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, W.G. and H. Caswell. 1982. On the comparative allocation of biomass, energy, and nutrients in plants. Ecology, 63: 982–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.C. and M.H. Beare. 1983. Breeding system and pollination ecology of Trientialis borealis (Primulaceae). Am. J. Bot., 70: 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antono vies, J. 1980. Concepts of Resource Allocation and Partitioning in Plants. In Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behaviour (J.E.R. Staddon, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  4. Armbruster, W.S. and K.E. Steiner. 1992. Pollination ecology of four Dalechampia species (Euphorbiaceae) in Northern Natal, South Africa. Am. J. Bot., 79: 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashman, T.-L. 1992. Indirect costs of seed production within and between seasons in a gynodioecious species. Oecologia, 92: 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashman, T.-L. 1994. Reproductive allocation in hermaphrodite and female plants of Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae) using four currencies. Am. J. Bot., 81: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashman, T.-L. and I. Baker. 1992. Variation in floral sex allocation with time of season and currency. Ecology, 73: 1237–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashman, T.-L., L.F. Galloway, and M.L. Stanton. 1993. Apparent versus effective mating in an experimental population of Raphanus sativus. Oecologia, 96: 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashman, T.-L. and M.L. Stanton. 1991. Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae). Ecology, 72: 993–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker, G.A. and R.M. Brooks. 1947. Effects of fruit thinning on almond fruits and seeds. Botanical Gazette 108: 550–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bazzaz, F.A. and R.W. Carlson. 1979. Photosynthetic contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort of an annual colonizer. New Phytol., 82: 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beattie, A.J., D.E. Breedlove, and P.R. Ehrlich. 1973. The ecology of the pollinators and predators of Frasera speciosa. Ecology, 54: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 224: 223–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bertin, R.I. 1982. Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). Am. J. Bot., 69: 122–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bertin, R.I. 1993. Incidence of monecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot., 80: 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bertin, R.I. and CM. Newman. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev., 59: 112–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bloom, A.J., F.S. Chapin III, and H.A. Mooney. 1985. Resource limitation in plants— an economic analogy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16: 363–392.Google Scholar
  18. Broyles, S.B. and R. Wyatt. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: Multiple paternity, functional gender and the “pollen-donation hypothesis.” Evolution, 44: 1454–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bullock, S.H., C. Martinez del Rio, and R. Ayala. 1989. Bee visitation rates to trees of Prockia crucis differing in flower number. Oecologia, 78: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Campbell, D.R. 1992. Variation in sex allocation and floral morphology in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot., 79: 516–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campbell, D.R. and A.F. Motten. 1985. The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology, 66: 554–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Campbell, D.R., N.M. Waser, M.V. Price, E.A. Lynch, and R.J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: Pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 45: 1458—1467.Google Scholar
  23. Casper, B.B. and T.R. La Pine. 1984. Changes in corolla color and other floral characteristics in Cryptantha humilis (Boraginaceae): Cues to discourage pollinators. Evolution, 38: 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chapin, F.S., III. 1989. The cost of tundra plant structures: Evaluation of concepts and currencies. Am. Nat., 133: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  26. Colosi, J.C. and P.B. Cavers. 1984. Pollination affects percent biomass allocated to reproduction in Silene vulgaris (bladder campion). Am. Nat., 124: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cruden, R.W. and D.L. Lyon. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems. Oecologia, 66: 299–306.Google Scholar
  28. Cruzan, M.B., P.R. Neal, and M.F. Willson. 1988. Floral display in Phyla incisa: Consequences for male and female reproductive success. Evolution, 42: 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Darwin, C. 1876. The Effect of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom. Murray, London.Google Scholar
  30. de Jong, T.J. and P.G.L. Klinkhamer. 1989. Limiting factors for seed production in Cynoglossum officinale. Oecologia, 80: 167–172.Google Scholar
  31. de Jong, T.J. and P.G.L. Klinkhamer. 1991. Early flowering in Cynoglossum officinale L.: Constraint or adaptation? Func. Ecol., 5: 750–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delph, L. and CM. Lively. 1989. The evolution of floral color change: Pollinator attraction versus physiological constraints in Fuchsia excorticata. Evolution, 43: 1252–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Devlin, B., J. Clegg, and N.C. Ellstrand. 1992. The effect of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution, 46: 1030–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Devlin, B. and N.C. Ellstrand. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am. Nat., 136: 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dieringer, G. 1991. Variation in individual flowering time and reproductive success of Agalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot., 78: 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edwards, J. and J.R. Jordan. 1992. Reversible anther opening in Lilium philadelphicum (Liliaceae): A possible means of enhancing male fitness. Am. J. Bot., 79: 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Evans, A.S. 1991. Whole-plant responses of Brassica campestris (Cruciferae) to altered sink-source relations. Am. J. Bot., 78: 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Farris, M.A. and M.J. Lechowicz. 1990. Functional interactions among traits that determine reproductive success in a native annual plant. Ecology, 71: 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Feinsinger, P., W.H. Busby, and H.M. Tiebout, III. 1988. Effects of indiscriminate foraging by tropical hummingbirds on pollination and plant reproductive success: Experiments with two tropical treelets (Rubiaceae). Oecologia, 76: 471–474.Google Scholar
  40. Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: Bumble bees and alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution, 43: 882–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Galen, C. 1992. Pollen dispersal dynamics in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution, 46: 1043–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Galen, C., T.E. Dawson and M.L. Stanton. 1993. Carpels as leaves: Meeting the carbon cost of reproduction in an alpine buttercup. Oecologia, 95: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Galen, C, J.A. Shykoff and R.C. Plowright. 1986. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. Am. Nat., 127: 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ganeshaiah, K.N. and R. Uma Shaanker. 1988. Regulation of seed number and female incitation of mate competition by a pH-dependent proteinaceous inhibitor of pollen germination in Leucaena leucocephala. Oecologia, 75: 110—113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gori, D.F. 1983. Post-pollination phenomena and adaptive floral changes. In Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
  46. Gregg, K.B. 1991. Reproductive strategy of Cleistes divaricata (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot., 78: 350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harder, L.D. and S.C.H. Barrett. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Func. Ecol., 6: 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harder, L.D. and J.D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal pollinated plants. Am. Nat., 133: 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harper, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Heithaus, E.R., P.A. Opler and H.G. Baker. 1974. Bat activity and pollination of Bauhinia pauletia: Plant-pollinator coevolution. Ecology, 55: 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Herrera, J. 1991. Allocation of reproductive resources within and among inflorescences of Lavandula stoechas (Lamiaceae). Am. J. Bot., 78: 789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hickman, J.C. and L.F. Pitelka. 1975. Dry weight indicates energy allocation in ecological strategy analysis in plants. Oecologia, 21: 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jansky, S.H. and D.M. Thompson. 1990. The effect of flower removal on potato tuber yield. Can. J. Plant Sci., 70: 1223–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jennersten, O. and M.M. Kwak. 1991. Competition for bumble bee visitation between Melampyrumpratense and Viscaria vulgaris with healthy and Ustilago-infected flowers. Oecologia, 86: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jennersten, O. and D.H. Morse. 1991. The quality of pollination by diurnal and nocturnal insects visiting common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Am. Midi. Nat., 125: 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kerner von Marilaun, A. 1895. The Natural History of Plants, Their Forms, Growth, Reproduction, and Distribution. Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Klinkhamer, P.G.L. and T.J. de Jong. 1987. Plant size and seed production in the monocarpic perennial Cynoglossum officinale L. New Phytol., 106: 773–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Knudsen, J.T. and J.M. Olesen. 1993. Buzz-pollination and patterns in sexual traits in North European Pyrolaceae. Am. J. Bot., 80: 900–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Laverty, T.M. 1992. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: A test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia, 89: 502–508.Google Scholar
  60. Lloyd, D.G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing sexual plants. In Perspectives on Plant Population Biology (R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan, eds.), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
  61. Lloyd, D.G. and C.J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zeal. J. Bot., 24: 135–162.Google Scholar
  62. Lloyd, D.G. and J.M. A. Yates. 1982. Intersexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphroditic plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution, 36: 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lovett Doust, J. and J.L. Harper. 1980. The resource cost of gender and maternal support in an andromonoecious umbellifer Smyrnium olusatrum. New Phytol., 85: 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Macnair, M.R. and Q.J. Cumbes. 1990. The pattern of sexual resource allocation in the yellow monkey flower, Mimulus guttatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 242: 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McDade, L. A. 1986. Protandry, synchronized flowering and sequential phenotypic unisex-uality in neotropical Pentagonia macrophylla (Rubiaceae). Oecologia (Berlin), 68: 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Melampy, M.N. 1987. Flowering phenology, pollen flow and fruit production in the Andean shrub Befaria resinosa. Oecologia, 73: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Merhroff, L.A., III. 1983. Pollination in the genus Isotria (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot., 70: 1444–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mitchell, R.J. and N.M. Waser. 1992. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: Pollination success of single flowers. Ecology, 73: 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Motten, A.F. 1982. Autogamy and competition for pollinators in Hepatica americana (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot., 69: 1296–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Motten, A.F. 1986. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr., 56: 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Motten, A.F., D.R. Campbell, D.E. Alexander and H.L. Miller. 1981. Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology, 62: 1278–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mulcahy, D.L., P.S. Curtis and A.A. Snow. 1983. Pollen competition in a natural population. In Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (L.E. Jones and RJ. Little, eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 330–337.Google Scholar
  73. Nilsson, L.A. 1992. Long pollinia on eyes: Hawk-moth pollination of Cynorkis uniflora Lindley (Orchidaceae) in Madagascar. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 109: 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nobel, P.S. 1977. Water relations of flowering in Agave deserti. Bot. Gaz., 138: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Petanidou, T. and D. Vokou. 1993. Pollination ecology of Labiatae in a Phryganic (East Mediterranean) ecosystem. Am. J. Bot., 80: 892–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pleasants, J.M. 1983. Nectar production patterns in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoni-aeceae). Am. J. Bot., 70: 1469–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Plowright, R.C. 1981. Nectar production in the boreal forest lilly, Clintonia borealis. Can. J. Bot., 59: 156–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Primack, R.B. 1985. Longevity of individual flowers. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16: 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Primack, R.B. and J.A. Silander. 1975. Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. Nature, 255: 143–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pyke, G.H. 1991. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature, 350: 58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rathcke, B. 1988a. Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology, 69: 446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rathcke, B. 1988b. Flowering phenologies in a shrub community: Competition and constraints. J. Ecol., 76: 975–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Real, L.A. and B.J. Rathcke. 1991. Individual variation in nectar production and its effect on fitness in Kalmia latifolia. Ecology, 71: 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rodriguez-Robles, J.A., E.J. Melendez, and J.D. Ackerman. 1992. Effects of display size, flowering phenology, and nectar availability on effective visitation frequency in Comparettia falcata (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot., 79: 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schemske, D.W. 1978. Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsamina-ceae): The significance of cliestogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology, 59: 596–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schemske, D.W. 1981. Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology, 62: 946–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schemske, D.W. and C.C. Horvitz. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: A precondition for mutualism specialization. Science, 225: 519–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schoen, D.J. and T.-L. Ashman. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: A resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated structures in modular organisms. Evolution 49: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schoen, D.J. and S.C. Stewart. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution, 40: 1109–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shaw, R.F. and J.D. Mohler. 1953. The selective advantage of the sex ratio. Am. Nat., 87: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Silander, J.A. and R.B. Primack. 1978. Pollination intensity and seed set in the evening primrose (Oenothera fruiticosa). Am. Midi. Nat., 100: 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Silvertown, J. 1987. The evolution of hermaphroditism: An experimental test of the resource model. Oecologia, 72: 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, C.A. and W.E. Evenson. 1978. Energy distribution in reproductive structures of Amaryllis. Am. J. Bot., 65: 714–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Snow, A.A. 1982. Pollination intensity and potential seed set in Passiflora vitifolia. Oecologia, 55: 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Snow, A.A. 1986. Pollination dynamics in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): Consequences for gametophytic selection. Am. J. Bot., 73: 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Snow, A.A. and P.O. Lewis. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: Empirical approaches. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 24: 331–351.Google Scholar
  97. Solomon, B.P. 1988. Patterns of pre- and postfertilization resource allocation within an inflorescence: Evidence for interovary competition. Am. J. Bot., 75: 1074–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Southwick, E.E. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: A neglected energy investment. Ecology, 65: 1775–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Southwick, E.E., G.M. Loper, and S.E. Sadwick. 1981. Nectar production, composition, energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of western New York. Am. J. Bot., 68: 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Spira, T.P., A.A. Snow, D.F. Whigham, and J. Leak. 1992. Flower visitation, pollen deposition and pollen-tube competition in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot., 79: 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stanton, M.L., T.-L. Ashman, L.F. Galloway, and H.J. Young. 1992. Estimating male fitness in natural populations. In Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction: New Approaches (R. Wyatt, ed.), Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 62–90.Google Scholar
  102. Stanton, M.L., J.K. Bereczky, and H.D. Hasbrouck. 1987. Pollination thoroughness and maternal yield regulation in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 14: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stanton, M.L. and R.E. Preston. 1988. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot., 75: 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stucky, J.M. and R.L. Beckmann. 1982. Pollination biology, self-incompatibility, and sterility in Ipomoea pandurata (L.) G.F.W. Meyer (Convoivulaceae). Am. J. Bot., 69: 1022–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sugden, E.A. 1986. Anthecology and pollinator efficacy of Styrax officinale subsp. redivivum (Styracaceae). Am. J. Bot., 73: 919–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thompson, K. and A. J. A. Stewart. 1981. The measurement and meaning of reproductive effort in plants. Am. Nat., 117: 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Thomson, J.D. and B.A. Thomson. 1989. Dispersal of Erythronium grandiflorum pollen by Bumble bees: Implications for gene flow and reproductive success. Evolution, 43: 657–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thomson, J.D. and B.A. Thomson. 1992. Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animal-pollinated plants: Consequences for reproductive success. In Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction: New Approaches (R. Wyatt, ed.), Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  109. van Steveninck, R.F.M. 1957. Factors affecting the abscission of reproductive organs in yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.) J. Exp. Bot., 8: 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Waser, N.M. and M.L. Fugate. 1986. Pollen precedence and stigma closure, a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia, 70: 573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Weiss, M.R. 1991. Floral colour changes as cues for pollinators. Nature, 354: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Werk, K.S. and J.R. Ehleringer. 1983. Photosynthesis by flowers of Encelia farinosa and Encelia californica (Asteraceae). Oecologia, 57: 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Whiley, A.W., K.R. Chapman, and J.B. Saranah. 1988. Water loss by floral structures of avocado (Persea americana cv. fuerte) during flowering. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 39: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Whitten, W.M. 1981. Pollination ecology of Monardadidyma, M. clinopodia, and hybrids (Lamiaceae) in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Am. J. Bot., 68: 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wilson, P. and J.D. Thomson. 1991. Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology, 72: 1503–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wolfe, L.M. and S.C.H. Barrett. 1989. Patterns of pollen removal and deposition in tristylous Pontederia cordata L. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 36: 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Young, H.J. and M.L. Stanton. 1990. Influence of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology, 71: 536–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zimmerman, M. 1983. Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: Experimental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos, 41: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Zimmerman, M. and G.H. Pyke. 1988. Pollination ecology of Christmas bells (Blandfordia nobilis): Patterns of standing crop of nectar. Aust. J. Ecol., 13: 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tia-Lynn Ashman
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Schoen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations