Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Meat Research ((ADMERE,volume 11))

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

The nutritional quality of the food supply has emerged as a major concern of consumers. Dietary fat and calories from fat are among the most important of these consumer concerns. The meat industry and the allied food service and retail industries are addressing these consumer concerns. Food consumption patterns have changed dramatically in the last two decades. Trends show a shift in the consumption of fats, with a decrease in visible, separable fat consumption and an increase in the intake of low fat animal products, such as low fat milk and fish (NRC, 1988). The popular press and consumer studies continue to support the findings of a 1985 consumer study by Yankelovich (1985). In that study, over two-thirds of the consumers surveyed had some concerns about health, with one of their major concerns being the amount of fat in their diets. Media reports also reinforce the 1987 survey by Burke Marketing Research (1987), where most consumers said that they were limiting the amount of fat, calories and cholesterol in their diets. This survey also found that consumers were responding positively to leaner beef cuts with the perception that these cuts were more healthy. Similar findings were reported from a National Consumer Retail Beef Study by Cross, Berry and Wells (1980). In that study, consumers perceived that closely trimmed (0.76cm external fat) or completely trimmed beef cuts were lower in fat and cholesterol than cuts with 1.27cm external fat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACS (1984) Nutrition and cancer, cause and prevention. An American Cancer Society special report. Ca-A Cancer J. Clinicians, 34(2), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AHA (1986) Dietary guidelines for healthy adult Americans. Am. Heart Assoc. Circ., 74, 1465A.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMI (1990) Meat Facts ‘90. American Meat Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. (1991a) Report to AMS, USDA on Evaluations of Lean Beef Patties (10% Fat) for Future Procurement and Use in the National School Lunch Program, Meat Science Research Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. (1991b) Report to AMS, USDA on Evaluations of a Second Production of Four Formulations of Lean Beef Patties (10% fat) Selected for Testing in the National School Lunch Program, Meat Science Research Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. (1992) Low fat level effects on sensory, shear, cooking and chemical properties of ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 57, 537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. (1993) Fat level and freezing temperature affect sensory, shear, cooking and compositional properties of ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 58, 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. (1994) Fat level, high temperature cooking and degree of doneness affect sensory, chemical and physical properties of beef patties. J. Food Sci., 59, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. and Leddy, K.F. (1984) Effects of fat level and cooking method on sensory and textural properties of ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 49, 870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W. and Wergin, W.P. (1993) Modified pregelatinized potato starch in low-fat ground beef patties. J. Muscle Foods, 4, 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.W., Joseph, R.L. and Stanfield, M.S. (1996) Use of electrical stimulation, hot processing and carrageenan for processing of low-fat ground beef patties. Meat Sci., 42, 111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, K.B., Huffman, D.L., Egbert, W.R. et al. (1994) Storage stability of low-fat ground beef made with lower value cuts of beef. J. Food Sci., 59, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, K.B., Huffman, D.L., Egbert, W.R. et al. (1995) Nonmeat ingredients for low-fat ground beef patties. J. Muscle Foods, 6, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke Marketing Research (1987) The Consumer Climate for Meat Study, Prepared for the National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL, and the American Meat Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H.R., Berry, B.W. and Wells, L.H. (1980) Effects of fat level and source on the chemical, sensory and cooking properties of ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 45, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H.R., Stansfield, M.S., Green, E.C. et al. (1975) Effect of fat and textured soy protein content on consumer acceptance of ground beef. J. Food Sci., 40, 1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, E.M., Troy, D.J. and Buckley, D.J. (1995) Eating quality of low fat beefburgers containing fat replacing functional blends. Proc. Int. Congr. Meat Sci. Technol., 41, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, R.L., Pearson, A.M., Anglemeir, A.F. and Holmes, Z. (1995) Konjac flour carrageenan gel as a suitable fat replacer in a ground meat system. Proc. Int. Congr. Meat Sci. Technol., 41, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S.R., Hinnergardt, L.C., Kluter, R.A. and Prell, P.A. (1975) Beef patties: the effect of soy protein and fat levels on quality and acceptability. J. Food Sci., 40, 1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkelberger, J.E., Summerford, D.H., Adrian, J.L. et al. (1991a) Consumer home-use evaluation of a developed lean ground beef product. J. Food Distrib. Res., 22, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkelberger, J.E., Summerford, D.H., Huffman, D.L. and Egbert, W.R. (1991b) Consumer response to a new lean ground beef product: results from a home-use, comparative test of AU lean. Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, W.R., Huffman, D.L., Chen, C.M. and Dylewski, D.P. (1991) Development of low fat ground beef. Food Technol., 45(6), 64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, W.R., Huffman, D.L., Chen, C.M. and Jones, W.R. (1992a) Microbial and oxidative changes in low-fat ground beef during simulated retail distribution J. Food Sci., 57, 1269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, W.R., Huffman, D.L., Bradford, D.D. and Jones, W.R. (1992b) Properties of low-fat ground beef containing potassium lactate during aerobic refrigerated storage. J. Food Sci., 57, 1033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Magoli, S.B., Laroia, S. and Hansen, P.M.T. (1995) Quality characteristics of low-fat ground beef patties formulated with whey protein concentrate. Proc. Int. Congr. Meat Sci. Technol., 41, 449.

    Google Scholar 

  • FMI (1990) Food Marketing Institute Survey-1990, Food Marketing Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, R.S. (1968) Consumer acceptance of ground beef. Proc. Recip. Meat Conf., 21, 353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D.L. and Egbert, W.R. (1990) Advances in lean ground beef production. Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D.L. and Powell, W.E. (1970) Fat content and soya level effect on tenderness of ground beef patties. Food Technol., 24, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasaback, C.M. (1991) Developments in lean ground beef technology. MS Thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P.A., Harrison, D.L. and Dayton, A.D. (1974) Quality attributes of ground beef on the retail market. J. Food Sci., 39, 610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kregal, K.K., Prusa, K.J. and Hughes, K.V. (1986) Cholesterol content and sensory analysis of ground beef as influenced by fat level, heating and storage. J. Food Sci., 51, 1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, C.L., Hunt, M.C. and Kropf, D.H. (1995) Display life and internal cooked color of ground beef from vitamin E supplemented steers. J. Food Sci., 60, 1175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law, H.M., Beeson, M.S., Clark, A.B. et al. (1965) Consumer acceptance studies. II. Ground beef of varying composition. La. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M.N., Huffman, D.L. and Egbert, W.R. (1991) A research note: replacement of beef fat with hydrogenated plant oil in lean ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 56, 861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M.N., Huffman, D.L., Egbert, W.R., McCaskey, T.A. and Liu, C.W. (1991) Soy protein and oil effects on chemical, physical and microbial stability of lean ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 56, 906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.F., Booren, A.M. and Gray, J.I. (1995) Quality attributes of low-fat cherry ground beef patties. Proc. Int. Congr. Meat Sci. Technol., 41, 427.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall, V.T. (1989) Effect of pH and total pigment concentration on the internal color of cooked ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 54, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mize, J.J. (1972) Factors affecting meat purchases and consumer acceptance of ground beef at three levels with and without soyabits. Southern Coop. Ser. Bull., 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCBA (1996) The Beef Brief, National Cattleman’s Beef Association, Englewood, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA (1987) National Restaurant Association Food Service Industry Forecast, National Restaurant Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1988) Current trends in the consumption of animal products, in Designing Foods: Animal Product Options in the Marketplace, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 18–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, K., Berry, B.W. and Paroczay, E. (1985) Contents and retention of nutrients in extra lean, lean and regular ground beef. J. Food Sci., 50, 701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D.M., McKeith, F.K., McLaren, D.G. et al. (1990) Effect of temperature, pressure, particle size, mixing time and fat content on the textural properties of ground beef. Proc. Recip. Meat Conf., 43, 171 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troutt, E.S., Hunt, M.C., Johnson, D.E. et al. (1992a) Chemical, physical and sensory characterization of ground beef containing 5 to 30 percent fat. J. Food Sci., 57, 25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troutt, E.S., Hunt, M.C., Johnson, D.E. et al. (1992b) Characteristics of low-fat ground beef containing texture modifying ingredients. J. Food Sci., 57, 19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K.E., Hunt, M.C. and Kropf, D.H. (1996) Myoglobin oxidative state affects internal color development in ground beef patties. J. Food Sci., 61, 513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S.E., Johnson, S.P. and Reagan, J.O. (1994) Hot processed raw materials and fat level affect physical and sensory properties of ground beef. J. Food Sci., 59, 707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, (1985) The Consumer Climate for Meat Products, Yankelovich, Skelly and White, Inc., prepared for the American Meat Institute, Washington, DC and the National Live Stock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huffman, D.L., Huffman, R.D. (1997). Production of low fat and reduced fat ground beef. In: Pearson, A.M., Dutson, T.R. (eds) Production and Processing of Healthy Meat, Poultry and Fish Products. Advances in Meat Research, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1125-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1125-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8429-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1125-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics