Skip to main content

Equipment Selection and Techniques of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Chapter
Atlas of Interventional Cardiology

Abstract

When Gruentzig first developed balloon angioplasty in the late 1970s, generally only patients with proximal discrete single-vessel lesions could be approached [1]. As angioplasty techniques, equipment, operator experience, and adjunctive therapies improved over the years, the scope of angioplasty extended to acute coronary syndromes, multivessel disease, and higher risk categories of patients. For each patient, the question posed must be whether relief of a single stenosis or multiple stenoses is possible and desirable, and whether complete revascularization is achievable. New technology has evolved, and many new devices have been used to treat specific types of lesions. Current devices used in catheterization laboratories include directional, extraction, and rotational atherectomy, stenting (now the most predominant treatment), lasers, and filters. Use of guide catheters, wires, and balloons is necessary, and common to most devices reviewed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gruentzig AR: Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis [letter]. Lancet 1978, II:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arani DT: A new catheter for angioplasty of the right coronary artery and aorto-coronary bypass graft. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1985, 11:647–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Metz D, Meyer P, Elaerts J: Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicen-ter, randomized trial. Am Heart J 1997, 134:131–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson JB, Bairn DS, Robert EW, et al.: A new catheter system for angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1982, 49:1216–1222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Talley JD, Hurst JW, King SB, et al.: Clinical outcome five years after attempted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 427 patients. Circulation 1988, 77:820–829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. King SB III: Angioplasty from bench to bedside. Circulation 1996, 93:1621–1629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonzel T, Wollschlager H, Meinertz T, et al.: The steerable monorail catheter system: a new device for PTCA [abstract]. Circulation 1986, 74(suppl):II-459.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonzel T, Wollschlager H, Kasper W, et al.: The sliding rail system (monorail): description of a new technique for intravascular instrumentation and its application to coronary angioplasty. Z Kardiol 1987, 76(suppl 6):119–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stack RS, Quigley PJ, Collins G, et al.: Perfusion balloon catheter. Am J Cardiol 1988, 61:776–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Zikek W: Prevention of radiographic contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000,343(3):180–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seldinger SI: Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiol Scand 1953, 39:368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ: Defining the optimal activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention: aggregate results from six randomized, controlled trials. Circulation 2001, 103:961–966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaluski E, Krakover R, Vered Z: Minimal heparinization in coronary angioplasty—how much heparin is really warranted? Am J Cardiol 2000, 85:953–956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch KT, Piek JJ, Lie KI: Safety of low-dose heparin in elective coronary angioplasty Heart 1997, 778:517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Shea JC, Hafley GE, Tcheng JE: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention: the ESPRIT trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 285:2468–2473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The EPIC Investigators: Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994, 330:956–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Altman, J.D., Rihal, C.S. (2003). Equipment Selection and Techniques of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. In: Holmes, D.R., Mathew, V. (eds) Atlas of Interventional Cardiology. Current Medicine Group, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1091-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1091-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Current Medicine Group, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0808-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1091-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics