The Incremental Rigidity Scheme and Long-Range Motion Correspondence

  • Shimon Ullman
Part of the The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 44)


The human visual system is capable of extracting three-dimensional shape information from two-dimensional transformations in the image. Experiments employing shadow projections of moving objects and computer generated displays have established that the three-dimensional shape of objects in motion can be perceived when their changing projection is observed, even when each static view is completely devoid of three-dimensional information.


Internal Model Human Visual System Rigid Transformation Perspective Projection Rigid Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adelson, E.H., and Movshon, J.A., (1982) ‘Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns,’ Nature, vol. 300, pp. 523–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobick, A., (1983) ‘A hybrid approach to structure-from-motion,’ ACM Interdisciplinary Workshop on Motion: Representation and Perception, Toronto, Canada, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
  3. Braddick, O.J., (1974) ‘A short-range process in apparent motion,’ Vision Research, vol. 14, pp. 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braunstein, M.L., (1962) ‘Depth perception in rotation dot patterns: Effects of numerosity and perspective,’ J. of Experimental Psychology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braunstein, M.L., (1976) Depth Perception Through Motion, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Clocksin, W.F., (1980) ‘Perception of surface slant and edge labels from optical flow: A computational approach,’ Perception, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidon, W.C., (1968) ‘Variance algorithm for minimization,’ The Computer J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 406–413.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eden, M., (1962) ‘A three-dimensional optical illusion,’ Quarterly Progress Rep., no. 64, MIT RLE, pp. 267–274.Google Scholar
  9. Fennema, C.L., and Thompson, W.B., (1979) ‘Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects,’ Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 9, pp. 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson,J.J.,and Gibson,E.J.,(1957) ‘Continuous perspective transformations and the perception of rigid motion,’ J. of Experimental Psychology,vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 129–138.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, B.F., (1961) ‘Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect,’ J. of Experimental Psychology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hay, C. J., (1966) ‘Optical motions and space perception–An extension of Gibson’s analysis,’ Psychological Review, vol. 73, pp. 550–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffman, D.D., and Flinchbaugh, B.E., (1982) ‘The interpretation of biological motion,’ Biological Cybernnetics, vol. 42, pp. 195–204.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn, B.K.P., and Schunck, B.G., (1981) ‘Determining optical flow,’ Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansson, G., and Johansson, G., (1973) ‘Visual perception of bending motion,’ Perception, vol. 2, pp. 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson, G., (1964) ‘Perception of motion and changing form,’ Scandinavian J. of Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johansson, G., (1974) ‘Visual perception of rotary motion as transformation of conic sections–A contribution to the theory of visual space perception,’ Psychologia, vol. 17, pp. 226–237.Google Scholar
  18. Johansson, G., (1975) ‘Visual motion perception,’ Scientific American, vol. 232, no. 6, pp. 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, G., (1978) ‘Visual event perception,’ in R. Held, H.W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber (eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  20. Johansson, G., and Jansson, G., (1968) ‘Perceived rotary motion from changes in a straight line,’ Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 4, no.3, pp. 165–170.Google Scholar
  21. Julesz, B., (1971)Foundation of Cyclopean Perception , University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Koenderink, J.J., and van Doom, A.J., (1975) ‘Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the motion of rigid bodies relative to the observer,’ Optica Acta, vol. 22, no. 9, pp.773–79Google Scholar
  23. Lappin, J.S., Doner, J.F., and Kottas, B.L., (1980) ‘Minimal conditions for the visual detection of structure and motion in three dimensions,’ Science, vol. 209, pp. 717–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lappin, J.S., and Fuqua, M.A., (1983) ‘Accurate visual measurement of three-dimensional moving patterns,’ Science, vol. 221, pp. 480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, D.N., (1976) ‘A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time to collision,’ Perception, vol. 5, pp. 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, D.N., (1980) ‘The optic flow field: The foundation of vision,’ Proc. Royal Society London, vol. B 290, pp. 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindsay, P.H., and Norman, D.A., (1972) Human Information Processing, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Longuet-Higgins, H.C., (1982) ‘The role of the vertical dimension in stereoscopic vision,’ Perception, vol. 11, pp. 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Longuet-Higgins, H.C., and Prazdny, K., (1980) ‘The interpretation of a moving retinal image,’ Proc. Royal Society London, vol. B 208, pp. 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marr, D., (1982) Vision, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  31. Miles W.R.,(1931) ‘Movement interpretations of the silhouette of a revolving fan,’ American J. of Psychology,vol. 43, pp. 392–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuhaus, W., (1930) ‘Experimentelle Untersuchung der Scheinbewegung,’ Arch. Ges. Psychology, vol. 75, pp. 315–452.Google Scholar
  33. Petersik, J.T., (1979) ‘Three-dimensional object constancy: Coherence of a simulated rotating sphere in noise,’ Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petersik, J.T., (1980) ‘The effect of spatial and temporal factors on the perception of stroboscopic rotation simulations,’ Perception, vol. 9, pp. 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shepard, R.N., and Metzler, J., (1971) ‘Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects,’ Science, vol. 171, pp. 701–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shepard, R.N., and Cooper, L.A., (1982) Mental Images and Their Transformations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Sperling, G., Pavel, M., Cohen, Y., Landy. M.S., and Schwartz, B.J., (1983) ‘Image processing in perception and cognition,’ in O.J. Brad-dick and A.C. Sleigh (eds.), Physical and Biological Processing of Images, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 359–378.Google Scholar
  38. Tsai, R.Y., and Huang, T.S., (1982) ‘Uniqueness and estimation of three-dimensional motion parameters of rigid objects with curved surfaces,’ Rep. R-921, Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  39. Ullman, S., (1979) The Interpretation of Visual Motion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Ullman, S., (1979a) ‘The interpretation of structure from motion,’ Proc. Royal Society London, vol. B 203, pp. 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ullman, S., (1979b) ‘Relaxation and constrained optimization by local processes,’ Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ullman, S., (1983) ‘Recent computational results in the interpretation of structure from motion,’ in Human and Machine Vision, J. Beck, B. Hope and A. Rosenfeld (eds.), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Ullman, S., and Hildreth, E.C., (1983) ‘The measurement of visual motion,’ in O.J. Braddick and A.C. Sleigh (eds.), Physical and Biological Processing of Images, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  44. Wallach, H., and O’Connell, D.N., (1953) ‘The kinetic depth effect,’ J. of Experimental Psychology, vol. 45, pp. 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallach, H., O’Connell, D.N., and Neisser, U., (1953) ‘The memory effect of visual perception of three-dimensional form,’ J. of Experimental Psychology, vol 45, pp. 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallach, H., Weisz, A., and Adams, P. A., (1956) ‘Circles and derived figures in rotation,’ American J. of Psychology, vol. 69, pp. 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Webb, J.A., and Aggarwal, J.K., (1981) ‘Visually interpreting the motions of objects in space,’ Computer, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, B.W., and Mueser, G.E., (1960) ‘Accuracy in reconstructing the arrangement of elements generating kinetic depth displays,’ J. Experimental Psychology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shimon Ullman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations