Abstract
In international comparisons of levels of industrial conflict and “strike- proneness,” Britain usually appears towards the middle, displaying neither the high propensity for strikes of the Italians nor the very low levels of the Swedes. However, during problem periods in British industrial relations, it is not surprising that British management have often looked at other nations with envy and attempted to discern a key ingredient in their industrial relations systems that could be adapted to the British context and contribute to a more harmonious relationship between managers and employees.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
. P. Blumberg, Industrial Democracy: The sociology of participation, Constable, London (1968).
. E. Brumlop & U. Juergens, Rationalisation and industrial relations—A case study of Volkswagen, in: O. Jacobi, B. Jessop, H. Kastendieck and M. Regini (eds.) Technical change, rationalisation, and industrial relations, Croom Helm, London (1986).
. I.G. Metall, Der erste Schritt unserer Gegenwehr [extracts translated as The first step in our fight back: First interim report of IGM covenors committee on the rationalization of Opel in Bochum], Author, Bochum (1984).
. A. Hingel, A promethean change of industrial relations—A comparative study of Western European unions and technological developments, in: M. Warner (ed.), Microprocessors, manpower and society, Gower, Aldershot (1984).
. G. Bamber & R. Lansbury, Codetermination and technical change in the German automobile industry, New Technology, Work and Employment, 1 (ii), 1986, pp. 160- 171.
. G. Bamber & R. Lansbury, Codetermination and technical change in the German automobile industry, New Technology, Work, and Employment, 1 (ii), 1986, pp. 160- 171.
. European Trade Union Institute, Negotiating technological change, Author, Brussels (1982), p. 40.
. S. Lash, The end of neo-corporatism?: The breakdown of centralized bargaining in Sweden", British Journal of Industrial Relations, 23 (2), 1985, pp. 215 - 239.
. B. Gustavsen, Technology and collective agreements: Some recent Scandinavian developments, Industrial Relations Journal, 16 (3), 1985, pp. 34 - 42.
. European Trade Union Institute, Negotiating technological change, Author, Brussels (1982), p. 70.
. Ruskin College Trade Union Research Unit, Seminar report: Trade unions, new technology, and the disclosure of company information, Ruskin College, Oxford (1982), p. 4.
. J. Ahlin & L. Svensson, New technology in mechanical engineering industry: How can workers gain control?, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 7(4), 1980, pp. 487- 521.
. B. Gustavsen, Technology and collective agreements: Some recent Scandinavian developments, Industrial Relations Journal, 16 (3), 1985, pp. 34 - 42.
. European Trade Union Institute, Negotiating technological change, Author, Brussels (1982), p. 72.
. B. Gustavsen, Technology and collective agreements: Some recent Scandinavian developments, Industrial Relations Journal, 16 (3), 1985, pp. 34 - 42.
. C. Gill, Work, Unemployment and the New Technology, Polity Press, Cambridge (1985), p. 141.
. S. Lash, The end of neo-corporatism?: The breakdown of centralized bargaining in Sweden, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 23 (2), 1985, pp. 215 - 239.
. C. Gill, Work, Unemployment, and the New Technology, Polity Press, Cambridge (1985), pp. 159 - 160.
. R. Whymant, The cradle to the grave system is taking a battering in Japan, Guardian, August 17, 1983.
. Japan External Trade Organization, Industrial robots, Now in Japan (No. 32), Author, Tokyo (1981), p. 15.
. A. Ishikawa, Microelectronics and Japanese industrial relations, in: M. Warner (ed.), Microprocessors, manpower, and society, Gower, Aldershot (1984), pp. 349 - 360.
. T. Nuki, The effect of microelectronics on the Japanese style of management, Labour & Society; Vol. 8 (4), 1983, pp. 393 - 400.
Australian Trade Union Handbook, Technology and union response, Trade Union Information and Research Centre, Sydney (1984).
. Association of Professional, Executive, Clerical and Computer Staff, Job design and new technology, Author, London (1985), p. 3.
. H. Ramsay, What is participation for? in: D. Knight, H. Willmott, & D. Collinson (eds.), Job redesign,Critical perspectives on the labor process, Gower, Aldershot
. H. Ramsay & M. Beirne, Computer redesign and "labor process" theory: Towards a critical appraisal, Department of Industrial Relations, University of Strathclyde
. E. Mumford & D. Henshaw, Participative approach to computer systems design, Associated Business Press, London (1979).
. H. Ramsay & M. Beirne, Computer redesign and "labor process" theory: Towards a critical reappraisal, Department of Industrial Relations, University of Strathclyde (1986).
. H. Rosenbrock, Social and engineering design of an FMS, paper to CAPE 83, Amsterdam (1983).
. M. Cooley, The new technology—Social impacts and human centered alternatives, Technology Policy Group Occasional Paper 4, Open University, Milton Keynes (1983).
. Utopia Project, Report No. 2, Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm (1981).
. Utopia Project, Report No. 2, Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldry, C. (1988). Alternative Approaches to Change. In: Computers, Jobs, and Skills. Approaches to Information Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1039-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1039-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-42963-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1039-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive