Amplitude and Correlational Mapping of EEG — A Software System

  • J. Wackermann
  • J. Hönig
  • L. Hrudová
  • C. Dostálek
Conference paper

Abstract

Since the times of Berger’s discovery (Berger, 1969), electroencephalography has undergone three major changes. There was a transition from single-channel to multi-channel recording; from analog to digital acquisition, storage and data-processing techniques; and from studies of punctually-derived potential differences to those of global potential field distributions, that is, from classical electroencephalography to topoelectroencephalography (see Petsche, 1976, for a historical review). Nowadays, topo-electroencephalography (TEEG) is becoming important, both in clinical practice as well as in the field of research. As a result, professional systems providing TEEG or, more popularly, “Brain Mapping” facilities have become commercially available, such as Brain Atlas (Biologic Systems), Pathfinder (Nicolet), or Brain Imager (Neuroscience). It would be precocious, however, to consider “home-made” systems obsolete; on the contrary, there is still an urgent need for methodical innovations, especially in experimental research work.

Keywords

Migration Coherence Neurol Topo Corti 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, H., 1969, On the electroencephalogram of man (P. Gloor, transl. and ed.), EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. (suppl. 28).Google Scholar
  2. Buchsbaum, M. S., Rigal, F., Coppola, R., Cappelleti, J., King, C., and Johnson, J., 1982, A new system for gray-level surface distribution maps of electrical activity, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 53: 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lehmann, D., 1977, The EEG as scalp field distribution, in: A. Remond, ed., “EEG Informatics”, Elsevier, Amsterdam: 365.Google Scholar
  4. Lehmann, D., 1984, EEG assessment of brain activity: spatial aspects, segmentation and imaging, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1: 267.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Livanov, M. N., and Ananiev, V. M., 1960, “Electroencefaloskopiya”, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M. H., and Echallier, J. F., 1987, Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 66: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Petsche, H., 1976, Topography of the EEG: survey and prospects, Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 79: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Walter, D. O., Etevenon, P., Pidoux, B., Tortrat, D., and Guillou, S., 1984, Computerized topo-EEG maps: difficulties and perspectives, Neuropsychobiology, 11: 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Wackermann
    • 1
  • J. Hönig
    • 1
  • L. Hrudová
    • 1
  • C. Dostálek
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physiological RegulationsCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations