Skip to main content

Incorporating “Fuzzy” Data and Logical Relations in the Design of Expert Systems for Nuclear Reactors

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence and Other Innovative Computer Applications in the Nuclear Industry
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

This paper applies the method of assigning probability in Dempster Shafer Theory (DST) to the components of rule-based expert systems used in the control of nuclear reactors. Probabilities are assigned to premises, consequences, and rules themselves. This paper considers how uncertainty can propagate through a system of Boolean equations, such as fault trees or expert systems. The probability masses assigned to primary initiating events in the expert system can be derived from observing a nuclear reactor in operation or based on engineering knowledge of the reactor parts. Use of DST mass assignments offers greater flexibility to the construction of expert systems in two important respects.

Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., under contract DE-AC05-840R2l400 with the U.S. Department of Energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chatalic, Philippe, Didier Dubois, Henri Prade, (1986), “An Approach to Approximate Reasoning Based on Dempster’s Rule of Combination,” paper presented at RAI/IPAR ’86 Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, June 18–20, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, Arthur P., (1967), “Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multi-Valued Mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics. Vol. 38, pp. 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Didier, and Henri Prade, (1987), “On the Combination of Uncertain or Imprecise Information,” L.S.I. Report #263, Universite Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France, submitted to Inter. Journal of Approximate Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernet, J., S. Ayme, and E. Sanchez, (1982), “Approximate Reasoning in Medical Genetics,” in Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory: Recent Developments. R. R. Yager (Ed.), (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, Michael A. S., (1987), “Uncertainty Analysis of Rule-Based Expert Systems Using Dempster-Shafer Mass Assignments,” Inter. Journal of Intelligent Systems, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishizuka, M., K. S. Fu, and J. T. P. Yao, (1981), “SPERIL-1: Computer-based Structural Damage Assessment Systems,” CE-STR-81–36, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayetta, IN, November 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Newton S., Yves L. Grize, and Khosrow Dehnad, (1987), “Quantitative Models for Reasoning under Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Expert Systems,” Inter. Journal of Intelligent Systems. Vol. II, pp. 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuschaefer, Carl H., Peter W. Rzasa, Eugene Filshtein, Richard L. Burrington, and Robert Donais, “Application of C-E’s Generic Diagnostic System to Power Plant Diagnostics,” paper presented at EPRI conference on Expert Systems Applications in Power Plants, Boston, MA, May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prade, H., (1985), “A Computational Approach to Approximate and Plausible Reasoning with Applications to Expert Systems,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel.. Vol. PAMI-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Glenn, (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).(1982), “Bayes’s Two Arguments for the Rule of Conditioning,” Ann. Statistics. Vol. 10, pp. 1075–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Conditional Probability,” International Statistical Review, Vol. 53, #3, pp. 261–277. “The Combination of Evidence,” Internat. J. Intelligent Systems. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 155–179. (1986) with P. P. Shenoy, and K. Mellouli, “Propagating Belief Functions in Qualitative Markhov Trees,” Working Paper No. 186, School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy, P. P. and G. Shafer, “Propagating Belief Functions Using Local Computations,” IEEE Expert. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skatteboe, Rolf, and Grethe Tangen, and Kaj Berge, (1987), “Models Applied in Knowledge Based Diagnosis,” paper presented at EPRI conference on Expert Systems Applications in Power Plants, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, H.-J., (1985), Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications. (Boston: Kluwer-Nihoff Publishing Co. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guth, A.S.M. (1988). Incorporating “Fuzzy” Data and Logical Relations in the Design of Expert Systems for Nuclear Reactors. In: Majumdar, M.C., Majumdar, D., Sackett, J.I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Other Innovative Computer Applications in the Nuclear Industry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1009-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1009-9_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8290-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1009-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics