Andreev Scattering at Rough Surfaces

  • Weiyi Zhang
  • J. Kurkijärvi
  • D. Rainer
  • E. V. Thuneberg
Part of the Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories book series (RPMT, volume 1)


In an Andreev reflection, a quasiparticle excitation turns from a particle into a hole or the other way around, reverses its direction of propagation and, to a good approximation, conserves its momentum. Such a process is peculiar to superconductors and superfluids where a quasiparticle can combine into a Cooper pair with another quasiparticle of nearly opposite momentum and substitute in its own place the hole or the particle left behind by the creation of the newly acquired partner. Andreev scattering is usually brought about by spatial changes in the order parameter of a superfluid. The prototype case is a quasiparticle meeting an increasing and eventually overwhelmingly large gap. Any rapid change of the order parameter, however, can call forth Andreev scattering. There is an enormous wealth of circumstances in which Andreev scattering may take place. The present article is about almost pure so called quantum Andreev scattering, i.e. Andreev scattering by a rapid change into a smaller gap than the energy of the quasiparticle as seen at surfaces or walls of p-wave superfluids. Some quasiparticles impinging on a wall of a superfluid container simply never reach the wall but turn back without exchanging momentum with the wall no matter how rough the wall may be. Not only the fate of the manifestly Andreev scattered particle will be at the focus of our interest here.


Effective Viscosity Rough Wall Andreev Reflection Specular Surface Background Scattering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Juhani Kujkijärvi and Dierk Rainer, “Andreev Scattering in Superfluid 3He,” in Anomalous Phases of 3 He, ed. W. P. Halperin, North Holland, 1987. to appear in Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences SeriesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. N. Ovchinnikov, “Critical Current of Thin Films for Diffuse Reflection from the Walls,” ZhETF, vol. 56, p. 1580, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. J. Culetto, G. Kieselmann and D. Rainer, “Influence of Interface Roughness on the Proximity Effect,” in 17 th Intern. Conf. on Low Temp. Physics, LT- 17, ed. U. Eckern, A. Schmid, W. Weber, H. Wühl, p. 1027, North-Holland, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. J. Buchholtz, “Fermi superfluids at a rough surface,” Phys. Rev., vol. B33, p. 1579, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Kieselmann and D. Rainer, “Branch Conversion at Surfaces of Superfluid 3He,” Z. Phys. B, vol. 52, p. 267, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Einzel and J. M. Parpia, “Finite Size Effects and Shear Viscosity in Superfluid 3He-B,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 58, p. 1937, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. W. Serine and D. Rainer, “The Quasiclassical Approach to Superfluid 3He,” Physics Reports, vol. 101, p. 221, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weiyi Zhang, J. Kurkijägvi and E. V. Thuneberg, “Variation of the Order Parameter of 3He-B Near a Diffusely Scattering Boundary,” Phys. Lett., vol. 109A, p. 238, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. J. Pethick, H. Smith, and P. Bhattacharyya, “Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of Superfluid 3He: Low-Temperature Limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 34, p. 643, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. N. Archie, T. A. Alvesalo, J. D. Reppy, and R. C. Richardson, “Viscosity Measurements in Superfluid 3He-B from 2 to 29 Bar,” J LTP, vol. 42, p. 295, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Einzel, P. Wölfle, H. Hojgaard Jensen and H. Smith, “Quantum-Slip Effect on the Viscosity of Superfluid 3He-B at Very Low Temperatures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 52, p. 1705, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weiyi Zhang
    • 1
  • J. Kurkijärvi
    • 1
  • D. Rainer
    • 2
  • E. V. Thuneberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Technical PhysicsHelsinki University of TechnologyEspooFinland
  2. 2.Physikalisches Institut der Universität BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  3. 3.LASSP, Clark HallCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations