Multiphoton Atomic and Molecular Coherent Excitations with Ultrashort Pulse Sequences

  • J.-C. Diels


With the recent progress in short pulse generation, an increasing number of experiments involving energy exchange between light and matter occur in conditions of coherent interactions. The time scale of the experiment becomes shorter than any collision time between particles of the ensemble. The radiation is thus interacting directly with isolated atoms. The condition of coherent interactions can be defined easily in the Bohr atom picture. Let us consider a rotating frame of reference in which the ground state electron appears at rest. A periodic electric field at ω = ω1/n (n integer) can induce transitions (transition rate proportional to En) to a higher orbit (of energy hω1 above the ground state). In this rotating frame of reference, the periodic motion of the electron is an atomic clock that will remember the phase of the excitation. The electron returns to the original position where it was created at every cycle. Hence, if the atom is truly isolated, it can be returned to the ground state by applying the opposite excitation after an integer number of periods. In conditions of coherent resonant interaction, the transfer of energy between radiation and matter is reversible, but also pulse shape dependent.


Pulse Sequence Harmonic Generation Stark Shift Rotational Quantum Number Dipole Matrix Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. S. Warren, NATO advanced research workshop on Molecular Processes with short intense laser pulses, Lennoxville, Quebec, July 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. P. Heritage, NATO advanced research workshop on Molecular Processes with short intense laser pulses, Lennoxville, Quebec, July 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.-C. Diels and A. T. Georges, Phys. Rev. A19, 1589 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.-C. Diels, J. J. Fontaine, I. C. McMichael, and F. Simoni, Appl. Optics 24, 1270 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Vanhergeele, H. J. Mackey, and J.-C. Diels, Appl. Optics 23, 2056–2061 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.-C. Diels and J. Stone, Phys. Rev. A31, 2397 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7a.
    N. Mukherjee, A. Mukherjee, and J.-C. Diels, to be publsihed (1987);Google Scholar
  8. 7b.
    N. Mukherjee, Ph.D. dissertation, North Texas State University (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    L. Lapidus and J. Seinfeld, “Numberical Solutions of Ordinary Differential Equations,” Academic Press, NY (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    A. V. Smith, Optics Lett. 10, 341 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    D. Normand, J. Morellec, and J. Reif, J. Phys. B16, L227–L232 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    J.-C. Diels and S. Besnainou, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6347 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-C. Diels
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomy and The Center for High Technology MaterialsThe University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations